Stay-In Contract
Drawing up employment contracts can help retain key employees and protect your trade secrets—but beware of the drawbacks.
URL:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/2001/august/42374.html
Should you enter into employment contracts with your employees?
Not if you don't want to alter the "at will"
relationship assumed in most states, under which you can terminate
an employee at any time for any reason or no reason. Still, there
are circumstances when employment contracts make sense.
First, the advantages. An employment contract can help you
attract and retain key employees. While you can't force
employees to stay, a contract can ensure that they'll provide
reasonable notice prior to departure-typically 60 to 90 days.
Especially in high-tech companies, employment contracts help
protect critical trade secrets. "Suppose you have people doing
research and development, and you're worried about an employee
leaving and disclosing what you're working on to the
competition," says Pat Lowry, an employment attorney with law
firm Steel Hector & Davis in West Palm Beach, Florida. An
employment contract can prohibit employees from revealing company
secrets, working for the competition or soliciting customers.
"You have to be very careful in drafting these, because
courts hate them," cautions Glenn Dowd, an employment attorney
with law firm Day, Berry & Howard in Hartford, Connecticut.
Because it's anticompetitive to prohibit people from earning a
livelihood in their field, he says, courts generally will enforce
noncompete agreements only if they're reasonable. You can't
prohibit employees from ever working for a competing business
anywhere in the country, but you might be able to enforce an
agreement that they not work for a competing business within a
30-mile radius of your company for two years, or that they not
solicit your company's customers for a year.
Employment contracts are also useful when you're buying or
selling a business to make sure key people don't leave.
"An employment agreement assures the new owners that the key
players are committed for a given period," Lowry says. You can
offer employees a retention bonus for staying or let them know
they'll be forfeiting a valuable severance package if they
leave.
Contracts also clarify individual jobs by spelling out
employees' responsibilities, compensation, bonuses, stock
options, rights to any inventions and patents, expense accounts and
more. You can include an "evergreen" clause stating that
the contract automatically renews on a given day each year if
neither side provides notice of termination. (Put the dates on your
calendar.) And an arbitration clause can ensure that any
employment-related dispute will be subject to binding arbitration
rather than played out in court, which can be expensive and
time-consuming. (See "Arbitration
Update")
Now the downside. Employment contracts change the "at
will" relationship, restricting your ability to terminate
employees who aren't working out. Typically you agree only to
terminate "for cause" unless you're at the end of the
contract term, which opens your decision to second-guessing by the
courts as to whether your cause was adequate.
If you draft an employment contract, pay special attention to
the termination section. You might want a clause denying certain
benefits if you terminate for cause-such as committing a felony or
acting in a way that's clearly harmful. "This gets the
employer out of having to pay severance packages after
misbehavior," Dowd says. Some employees might negotiate
"double trigger" clauses, in which they can resign
"for good reason" (such as being reassigned to another
department) and still be entitled to a severance package.
"I would not make a practice of making employment
agreements except for key employees," Dowd says. "It
introduces a level of complexity and legality to the relationship
that you don't need." Certainly, consult your attorney
about clauses to include and avoid.
| Arbitration Update:
Many employers require employees to sign documents stating that any
dispute with the company will be resolved through arbitration. On
April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that such agreements are
legally binding. The decision affirms the legal right of employers
to avoid expensive litigation by submitting discrimination claims
and other employment matters to arbitration.The case in question concerned a Circuit
City employee who filed a discrimination claim against the company.
The company argued that the dispute must be resolved through
arbitration because the employee's signed job application
included a provision agreeing to submit any and all claims to
binding arbitration. A federal judge sided with the company. But
the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that ruling, pointing
to the wording of the Federal Arbitration Act, which excludes
employment contracts of seamen, railroad employees and other
workers engaged in interstate commerce. That means all employees,
the 9th Circuit irrationally ruled. Obviously not so, said the U.S.
Supreme Court. Except for transportation workers, all employees who
sign an arbitration clause must submit disputes to
arbitration. |
| |
Steven C. Bahls, dean of Capitol University Law School in
Columbus, Ohio, teaches entrepreneurship law. Freelance writer Jane
Easter Bahls specializes in business and legal topics.
Copyright ©
2009 Entrepreneur Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy