Caps Off to You!
More small-business opportunities can flow freely now that the SBA has finally removed its 7(a) loan cap.
URL:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/2003/june/61908.html
To talk to insiders who labored to lift the $500,000 cap from
the SBA's 7(a) loan program, the process held enough drama to
last its players a good long while. The SBA imposed the limit in
October after President Bush's proposed fiscal 2003 budget cut
in half the amount of loans the agency would be able to guarantee
for the year.
But after five months of vigorous lobbying by the U.S. Chamber
of Commerce as well as a coalition of small-business
organizations--and thanks to the introduction of a new econometric
model that will forecast the costs of the 7(a) loan program much
more accurately--the SBA finally restored the maximum loan amount
to $2 million earlier this year.
Giovanni Coratolo, director of small-business policy at the
Chamber of Commerce and the originator of the fight to remove the
7(a) loan cap, was surprised it happened so quickly. "It's
amazing because generally legislative efforts take 10 years,"
says Coratolo, who, back in January, said the cap had only a
fifty-fifty chance of being removed.
Although the relatively swift resolution came as a great relief
to many, some business owners had to postpone or cancel their plans
to expand their companies because the SBA could not back their
loans during the $500,000 cap period.
Hitesh Bhakta, chairman of the Asian American Hotel Owners
Association (AAHOA), says the $500,000 loan cap made it essentially
impossible for some of the AAHOA's members to get bank
financing for their projects. "Most local lenders would say,
at minimum, you need a million and a half [to build a new
hotel]," Bhakta says. "They say 'I have to risk a
million? Forget it.'"
In fact, one of the AAHOA's members was preparing to start
construction on a new hotel in Southern California, when he learned
that his bank wouldn't make the loan because of the SBA cap.
"He seriously considered giving up 50 percent of the project
to a joint venture partner or a VC," explains Bhakta. "He
didn't, and because of the cap reversal, he's in the
driver's seat again." But many other entrepreneurs were
probably less fortunate.
Still, others wonder whether another 7(a) loan cap could
possibly appear in the future. The SBA's Mike Stamler says no.
"This is not something we do willy-nilly," he asserts,
adding that the organization is as committed as ever to helping
small businesses start and grow.
However, the amount of money that has been apportioned to the
7(a) program in President Bush's fiscal 2004 budget is still
raising some eyebrows; at $9.4 billion, it's nearly $3 billion
less than the fiscal 2002 demand. James Ballentine, director of
community development for the American Bankers Association, fought
to remove the cap and says the problem lies in the administration
because it's pushing for smaller loans.
"The average loan size in 7(a) is $230,000 now. They'd
like to get it down to around $175,000," says Ballentine. That
amount might be sufficient for some start-ups, he adds, but it
won't be as helpful for established businesses seeking to
expand. He quips, "I think they're trying to turn this
into the 'Very Small Business Administration.'"
Coratolo agrees that focusing on one group or type of small
businesses to the exclusion of others is a mistake. "You
can't buy a restaurant or hotel for $100,000. It just
doesn't exist," he explains. "So you have to be
sensitive to the fact that there's a different maturity level
within all businesses and that capital, in some cases, is the
barrier in going from one level of maturity to the next, whether
it's start-up or growth."
Still, Coratolo says the lifting of the cap is a positive step
in the right direction, and while the amount budgeted for 2004
seems a bit low, he says demand tends to ebb during periods of
economic uncertainty. "In many cases, [businesses] don't
want to go too far into debt," he acknowledges. That said, the
Chamber of Commerce hopes to add funds to the program by lobbying
Congress. The $9.4 billion, Coratolo says, "may be a little on
the low side."
C.J. Prince is the executive editor of CEO Magazine.
She can be reached at cjprince@chiefexecutive.net.
Copyright ©
2009 Entrepreneur Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy