Ask Entrepreneur

We are in the business of flipping homes. We recently hired a painter to paint the interior and exterior of one of our properties. We signed a contract at commencement of the project and paid 50 percent upfront, with the balance due at completion. The painter demanded several payments throughout the project--not adhering to the contracted payment schedule. Needless to say, we made those payments and by completion of the project the painter had already been paid the contracted amount in full, though he never provided receipts. Two days after completion we were served notice that he was suing us for an additional amount. He filed suit on Nov. 12. Then on Nov. 24, we received an invoice in the mail for charges for what he called extra services. Regardless of the fact that we refute these so-called extra services--as it was our understanding that these services were part of the original scope of work--my question is: Does he have the legal right to sue us on Nov. 12 for what he cited?