In The Clear?
A bill to ease National Labor Relations Board action against small business is up for a fourth time. Will it pass?
The effort by Republicans to remove a large swath of small
businesses from the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB) has picked up unspoken support. H.R. 1620 would modify
the gross receipts thresholds, established in 1959, which determine
whether unionized employees in a small business can bring unfair
labor practice complaints to the NLRB. By bumping up the numbers
for inflation, fewer small businesses would have to worry about
action from the NLRB.
H.R. 1620 would increase the thresholds significantly. The
threshold for retail businesses would increase from $500,000 to
$2.7 million. For nonretail businesses, it would rise from $50,000
to $275,773. Unionized employees at companies with gross receipts
below those thresholds could still file complaints in state
courts.
James Truesdale, chair of the NLRB, is taking a neutral position
on the bill--a significant change from the view of his predecessor,
William Gould IV, who left the NLRB last August. Although he never
publicly opposed increasing the thresholds, Gould was thought to be
avidly against the threshold-adjustment bill introduced in previous
Congresses by Rep. Ernest Istook (R-OK).
Content Continues Below
The Istook bill passed the House three times in previous
sessions as a rider but was either shot down by President Bill
Clinton or the Senate Appropriations Committee, which has
jurisdiction over the NLRB budget. Although it's a rider again,
Truesdale's neutrality may make a difference this year.
The bill's premise is that it's too easy to file
harassing and empty charges that cause small businesses to either
spend huge sums contesting the charges or settle in an effort to
avoid legal bills. In fiscal 1997 (the latest year for which
statistics are available), business firms and labor unions filed
33,439 charges of unfair labor practices with the NLRB. More than
three-quarters of the charges were filed by employees, and 10
percent of those involved companies that employed fewer than 10
workers. Only 2 percent of the 33,439 cases went to the Board for a
decision.
In a letter to House members, Istook provides examples of two
companies with eight and four employees, respectively, whose owners
spent $11,000 and $7,500 fighting NLRB charges that were eventually
dismissed. Had those cases been forced into state court because
they were too small to be considered by NLRB, as would be the case
under the Istook bill, the entrepreneurs could have collected some
court costs.
Stephen Barlas is a business reporter who covers the
Washington beat for 15 magazines.