Handle With Care
Office temps--what you need to know about the legal rights of these fleeting employees.
When crunch time comes and your business is short-handed, a
quick call to a temporary employment agency puts willing workers at
your doorstep. So far, so good--but what if one of these temp
workers turns out to be a poor match? Simply asking the agency to
send a replacement might solve the problem. Then again, it might
subject your business to liability for unlawful termination. Temporary employees have the same rights as any other employee
to sue over illegal discrimination, sexual harassment, ADA
violations or labor disputes. "Employers mistakenly think
temporary employees have fewer legal rights," says Brent
Giddens, an employment attorney with the Los Angeles office of
Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal. Unfortunately, employers and
co-workers often give temporary employees little consideration or
respect, and supervisors often feel they can have these employees
removed without consequence. That attitude can lead to costly
lawsuits. This may come as a surprise, because the employment agency is
supposed to be the employer. After all, the agency handles the
recruiting, screening, hiring, placement, payroll and benefits. But
when a dispute at your workplace turns into a lawsuit, the worker
is likely to sue both the employment agency and your business--plus
individual supervisors at both companies. The question for the
courts is: Who was the employer? Even if the temporary agency
promises to take full responsibility, when both companies are named
in the lawsuit, it's up to the court to decide. Typically,
courts have determined that the companies are joint employers, with
joint liability. Content Continues Below
The longer the temporary employee works at your company and the
more supervisory control you exercise, the more likely a court will
find you to be a joint employer with the agency. In one New York
district court case, a temporary agency sent an African-American
woman to work as an administrative assistant for a financial
services firm. After two weeks, the firm discharged her, saying her
work was unsatisfactory. The woman sued the firm, claiming she was
dismissed because of her race, sex and national origin. Before
dealing with the merits of the case, however, the court had to rule
on whether the firm was a joint employer with the temporary
employment agency. Because the firm exercised complete control over
her work assignments, hours and means of performance, it was ruled
to be an employer, subject to the temp worker's Title VII
lawsuit. In another case, a temporary employee assigned to an auto
dealership in Virginia claimed she had been sexually harassed by
the general manager, then dismissed by the temporary employment
agency when she complained. She sued everyone involved: the
temporary employment agency, the dealership, the general manager
and the car company. All but the employment agency attempted to
remove themselves from the lawsuit, arguing that they were not her
employers. Both the district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit ruled that all defendants controlled some
aspect of her employment, so all were subject to her Title VII
claim. The general manager and the dealership later settled with
the employee, while the temporary agency and the car company were
held not liable because they knew nothing of the harassment.
Page 1 | 2
|
What makes a good client gift?
What guidelines do you follow when buying gifts for your clients? Have you ever received an unusual or inappropriate gift?
|