Raise Ration?
Nearly everyone is feeling a little poorer these days. And it's
more than a feeling: It's reality.
The IRS reports that in 2001, taxable income declined by 5.2
percent nationally. This pattern continued in 2002, with top
earners-those in the 90th percentile-earning 1.4 percent less than
the year before, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a
Washington, DC, think tank.
Employees may not feel richer for a while yet. Mercer Human
Resource Consulting LLC reports salaries won't increase much in
2004. The HR consulting firm predicts the average raise will be
about 3.6 percent-less than one percentage point above the
inflation rate.
Content Continues Below
"Companies are going to be extremely cautious about fixed
costs, and salary increases are an expensive fixed cost," says
Charles Peck, compensation specialist with The Conference Board
Inc., a New York City-based think tank.
Escalating health-care costs are one reason business owners
aren't likely to be generous with raises. "The money for
health-care benefits is coming from the same pot as
compensation," says Peck. Employees need to know this so they
can put thin raises in perspective. The good news for small
companies, he says, is they aren't as likely to be outspent for
talent since big firms may not be any more generous.
Candid
Cameras
Cell phones with built-in digital cameras pose the latest danger to
companies' trade secrets. In fact, camera-phones are so easily
used to snap photos of prototypes and other sensitive information,
at least one manufacturer, Samsung Electronics, reportedly banned
its own products from its offices and factories. Sneaky idea
thieves have long used hidden cameras to snap photos of sensitive
information. But camera-phones are insidious because they can be
used out in the open, says George L. Spinelli, a former FBI special
agent and chairman of Spinelli Corp., a Scottsdale, Arizona-based
firm that specializes in combating corporate espionage. Businesses
that operate in the public eye, such as retailers, can't
reasonably expect to keep anything private, he says. But those that
have security-protected areas where they develop and test new
products have every right to protect their ideas. Says Spinelli,
"If I were taking clients or journalists into an R&D area,
I would request that cell phones [be] checked at the
door."
Equal Time
Function, not form, is finally dictating who gets the corner
office. "The corner office went out with the three-piece
suit," declares Kimberly Marks, president of The Marks Design
Group Inc., a commercial design firm in San Antonio.
"It's the metaphor for the command-and-control
management style that has gone by the wayside." The image of
the corner office as the ultimate corporate destination still
dominates the popular imagination. But some companies are rejecting
the entire corner-office setup-literally-in favor of a more
democratic layout.
Nila Leiserowitz, vice president of architecture and design firm
Gensler in Los Angeles, which has studied the impact of office
design on employee performance, says the waning importance of
corner offices reflects flattened management structures and the
emerging significance of cooperation in the workplace.
"Executives are trying to provide a platform to employees that
says, 'I'm working with you, and you're not just
working for me.'" Cool bosses use that precious real
estate, still coveted for its sunlight and 180-degree views, for
the benefit of many, not just themselves. Common uses include
meeting spaces or space dedicated to teams whose projects require a
common space for the duration of the project. Marks often
recommends using it as a "war room," with the high-power
location connoting use for high-voltage brainstorming strategy
sessions.
But democratizing the corner office conflicts with some industry
cultures, warns Leiserowitz. So if clients tend to judge your power
to negotiate by the prestige of your office, make sure the top dog
in the company gets it.
65% of employees laid off from spring 2000 to
spring 2003 were given no severance or other compensation from
their employers. SOURCE: Work Trends
|
| 80% of executives say they would rather run a
private company than a public company. SOURCE: Statistic Source: Clark
Consulting
|
|
Joanne Cleaver has written for a variety of publications,
including the Chicago Tribune and Executive Female.