No doubt, those suggestions make working with researchers appear to
be a daunting endeavor, but it can also be exciting. The simple process
of articulating a problem or challenge to an outsider--who can listen
but does not need to respond--often leads to a more nuanced
understanding for the person facing the problem. By actually raking on
an active role-in which the researcher and manager weave together
different, but equally important inputs and jointly discover new
insights--the manager not only improves organizational performance, but,
on a personal level, often learns that the most powerful learning and
creative leaps occur in collaboration. Qualitative research has the
potential to provide managers with the richest return for the problem at
hand, but, more important, for enhancing their decision-making and
intuitive skills. Most of all, it represents one way for managers to
participate in creating something new that extends beyond the
organization and guides the industry to new levels of understanding an d
performance.
A Key Merger of Talents
In this article, I explored the process of qualitative research,
its role in creating new knowledge for the hospitality industry, and
ways that managers may wish to contribute to research projects to help
ensure its rigor and usefulness. Managers and researchers are encouraged
to contribute jointly to projects and, together, to interpret and apply
results. If conducted appropriately, qualitative research represents an
exciting venue for creating new, useful knowledge in a manner that
serves both researchers and practitioners' divergent needs. It
represents a key way for practitioners and academics to merge their
talents, expertise, and passion in support of advancing the science of
the hospitality industry.
EXHIBIT 1
Qualitative-data collection methods
Purpose of the Guiding research
study questions
Exploratory * What is happening?
* To investigate * What are the salient
little-understood themes and patterns
phenomena that emerge in
participants'
meaning structures?
* To identify * How are these
important constructs patterns linked?
Explanatory
* To explain the * What events, beliefs
relationships between and attitudes are
the phenomena in shaping this
question phenomenon?
* To identify a causal * How do these forces
or process model interact?
Purpose of the Research
study methodologies
Exploratory Grounded-theory
analysis
* To investigate Deconstruction
little-understood
phenomena Discourse analysis
Critical-theory
analysis
* To identify Case study
important constructs
Explanatory
* To explain the Dramatism
relationships between
the phenomena in
question
* To identify a causal Narrative analysis
or process model
Ethnography
Feminist-based approaches
Action research and
insider-outsider research
Purpose of the Data-collection
study method
Exploratory Participant observation,
field notes, filming
* To investigate Structured or
little-understood unstructured
phenomena interviews (group
or individual,
oral or written)
Written stories
of personal
* To identify experiences and
important constructs life histories
Explanatory
* To explain the Social-network
relationships between diagrams
the phenomena in
question
* To identify a causal Recording of kinesics
and proxemics
or process model
Historical analysis
Researcher accounts
of involvement
in a change initiative
Source: Adapted and modified from: C. Marshall and G.B. Rossman,
Designing Qualitative Research (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989).
(1.) For a detailed explanation of a qualitative-research
technique, see: Robert J. Kwortnik, Jr., "Clarifying
'Fuzzy' Hospitality-management Problems with Depth Interviews
and Qualitative Analysis, on pages 117-129 of this Cornell Quarterly.
(2.) M.S. Davis, "That's Interesting! Toward a
Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology,"
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 1 (1971), PP. 309-344.
(3.) S.R. Barley, G.W. Meyer, and D.C. Gash, "Culture of
Cultures: Academics, Practitioners, and the Pragmatics of Normative
Control," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1 (1988),
pp. 24-60.
(4.) S.B. Bacharach, "Organizational Theories: Some Criteria
for Evaluation," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4
(1989), pp. 496-515.
(5.) D.A. Whetten, "What Constitutes a Theoretical
Contribution?," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4
(1989), pp. 490-495.
(6.) N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, "Entering the Field of
Qualitative Research," in Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed.
N.K. Denzin and YS. Lincoln (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,
1994), p. 2.
(7.) J.M. Bartunek and M. Seo, "Qualitative Research Can Add
New Meanings to Quantitative Research," Journal of Organizational
Behavior, Vol. 23 (2002), pp. 237-242.
(8.) M.B. Miles and A.M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An
Expanded Sourcebook (London: Sage, 1994), p. 7.
(9.) E.G. Guba and Y.S. Lincoln, "Competing Paradigms in
Qualitative Research," in Denzin and Lincoln, pp. 105-117.
(10.) Denzin and Lincoln, p. 6.
(11.) R.I. Sutton and A. Rafseli, "Untangling the Relationship
between Displayed Emotions and Organizational Sales: The Case of
Convenience Stores," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3
(1989), pp. 461-487.
(12) Ibid, p. 472.
(13.) See, for example: C.J.G. Gersick, J.M. Bartunek, and J.E.
Dutton, "Learning from Academia: The Importance of Relationships in
Professional Life," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 6
(2000), pp. 1026-1044; and RJ. Boland, Jr., J. Singh, P. Salipante, J.D.
Aram, S.Y. Fay, and P. Kanawattanachai, "Knowledge Representations
and Knowledge Transfer," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44,
No. 2 (2001), PP. 393-417.
(14.) For a dense but useful explanation of qualitative-research
traditions, see: Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition, ed.
N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000).
(15.) A. Prasad and P. Prasad, "The coming of Age of
Interpretive Organizational Research," Organizational Research
Methods, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2002), Pp. 4-11.
(16.) V.J. Janesick, "The Dance of Qualitative Research
Design," in Denzin and Lincoln (1994), p. 209.
(17.) C. Marshall and G.B. Rossman, Designing Qualitative Research
(Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989).
(18.) A.M. Huberman and M.B. Miles, "Data Management and
Analytic Methods," in Denzin and Lincoln (1994), pp. 428-444.
(19.) Guba and Lincoln, p. 114.
(20.) D.L. Altheide and J.M. Johnson, "Criteria for Assessing
Interpretative Validity in Qualitative Research," in Denzin and
Lincoln (1994), pp. 485-499.
(21.) Y. Lincoln and E. Guba. Naturalistic Inquiry (Beverly Hills,
GA: Sage, 1985).
(22.) Guba and Lincoln, op. Cit.
(23.) Bartunek and Seo, op. cit.
(24.) S.L. Rynes, J.M. Bartunek, and R.L. Daft, "Across the
Great Divide: Knowledge creation and Transfer between Practitioners and
Academies," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2001),
PP. 340-355.
(25.) P. Shrivastava and I.I. Mitroff, "Enhancing
Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers'
Assumptions," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 1 (1984),
pp. 18-26.
(26.) G. Johns, "constraints on the Adoption of
Psychology-based Personnel Practices: Lessons from Organizational
Innovation," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 3 (1993), pp.
569-592.
(27.) S.A. Mohrman, C.B. Gibson, and A.M. Mohrman, Jr., "Doing
Research that Is Useful to Practice: A Model and Empirical
Exploration," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2001),
P. 357.
(28.) Rynes et. al, op. cit.
(29.) Ibid.
(30.) C. Arygris and D. Schon, Organizational Learning: A
Theory-of-action Perspective (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978).
(31.) T.M. Amabile, C. Patterson, J. Mueller, T. Wojcik, P.W
Odomirok, M. Marsh, and S.J. Kramer, "Academic-practitioner
Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-profession
Collaborarion," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2
(2001), pp. 418-431.
Kate Walsh, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of organizational
management at the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
(kmw33@cornell.edu).
COPYRIGHT 2003 Cornell
University Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.