Making globalization globally
advantageous.
by Nagendra Bharadwaj, Prashanth
One of the most polarizing debates in the world today concerns the
effects of globalization. Some of the principle reasons for this is
that: a) most people are locked into preconceived notions (Barnevik,
2001), b) the inability to keep a long-term perspective on the effects
of globalization, and c) the inability of people on both sides of the
debate to see the gray aspects between what they perceive as being
"black and white."
Most scholars agree that the phenomenon of globalization is an
irreversible one. Globalization has been occurring not only in the field
of economics, but also in political and socio-cultural arenas. The ills
of globalization have been widely publicized by the vociferous opponents
of globalization. However, while many of their arguments are well
founded, it is more prudent to understand the reasons for some of the
problems of globalization and tackle those issues to minimize their
negative impact. In addition, it is important to build on the advantages
of globalization and ascertain that a much larger population of the
world benefits from the economic, political and social process of
globalization.
To fully realize the potential benefits of globalization, certain
steps need to be taken at three levels: local (country-level), regional
and international levels. The economic disparity between similar
neighboring countries such as North & South Korea, Thailand &
Myanmar, and Chile & Peru will be minimized only by ardent efforts
on all these levels. The information technology (IT) revolution and the
"second industrial revolution" that are taking place today are
restricted to only a small part of the developing world and, in many
cases, to certain small sections of the populations in the developing
countries. Until the positive effects of globalization becomes more
widespread, the debate on globalization will be understandably won over
by its detractors despite the overall long-term advantages of
globalization--minimizing poverty and increasing the possibilities of
democratization.
At the country level, the first thing many countries need to do is
to create a true market economy where open competition and independent
government are the norm. All countries in the developing world, and many
countries even in the developed world, need to work hard in establishing
a true market economy. Across most nations, the governments need to
demonstrate strong and responsible fiscal policies that will instill
confidence among investors. There is also a need for the governments in
developing countries to eliminate corruption and bureaucracy, while
providing a fertile ground for foreign investment in their countries. In
developed countries, the political leaders need to have the fortitude to
convince their populace of the advantages of minimizing/eliminating
subsidies in certain domestic sectors of their economy. Tariff and
non-tariff barriers (e.g. the CE Mark in Europe) by the developed world
have prevented many developing countries from fully participating in the
global economy. These barriers have also negatively affected the people
in the developed world, since they prevent them from buying commodities
at the cheapest price in the global economy.
The demographics in developed countries are often used to defend
the tariff and non-tariff barriers. Instead of considering the
phenomenon of low birth rates and consequent rapidly aging populations
as a disadvantage, developed countries need to view this as an
advantage. These countries need to pioneer products and services for
this typically affluent section of the population and tap into the
global market among the elderly. Also, many developed countries need to
focus on improving the productivity in their service industries which
will automatically move more of the industrial sectors to the developing
countries. Thus, improving service productivity will help both developed
and developing countries.
Apart from the possible exceptions of countries such as the U.S.,
most countries (including the developed ones) need to better nurture the
entrepreneurial spirit among small and medium businesses and encourage
them to become more actively involved in the global economy. Current
international trade is largely dominated by mega-corporations and their
subsidies.
Another concern in many developed countries is effective corporate
governance. Lack of enforcement of stringent auditing regulations
combined with poor ethical standards among some business leaders have
lent support to arguments made by the critics of big business and,
hence, globalization. Many of the recent corporate scandals in the U.S.
and the banking system problems in Japan are hardly the lessons that the
developing countries need to emulate in their pursuit of creating a
global enterprise.
It is also important for developed countries to realize that the
advantages of developing countries go beyond cheap labor. If cheap labor
is the only motivation for investors from developed countries, the
wealth in the developing countries will be concentrated among the few
who can "exploit" the cheap labor. Poverty will decline but
the disparity between the poor and the rich will widen. However, some of
the R&D and manufacturing investments by MNCs in countries such as
India and Brazil have resulted in not only reducing poverty but also in
strengthening the middle class in those countries, which in turn has
brought about additional indirect advantages.
Strong markets at the regional level can help many developing
countries learn "the tricks of the trade." There are scores of
developing countries in Asia, Latin America and particularly Sub-Saharan
Africa that are yet to realize any benefits whatsoever from
globalization. The people in these countries do not see the difference
between colonization and globalization, both of which stand for
exploitation to them. Some of the successful regional markets such as
NAFTA, the European Union and ASEAN have been amongst generally
developed countries that put the developing countries at a further
disadvantage. Since the developing countries are outside of these
regional markets, their exports face tough competition from that of the
developed countries in the region. There is a need for developed
countries to expand the successful regional markets to include some of
the less developed countries and help them export their products more
freely to the developed countries.
Strong or stronger regional economic cooperation and FTAs in
regions such as Middle East, South Asia and Africa will not only help
the developing countries in creating a better investment climate and
providing economic clou, but also help in alleviating the political
problems that include cross-border hostilities in some regions.
At the global level, it is important for developed countries to
show leadership in areas such as caring for the environment, corporate
social responsibility, human resource development, etc. At the same
time, developing countries need to be given an opportunity to catch up
with the social conditions in the developed world and it is unreasonable
for developing countries to be put under pressure to elevate social
welfare conditions to the levels similar to that of developed countries.
Some of the multinational companies have taken the lead in corporate
social responsibility in the last few years across all countries that
they operate in and they need to continue to demonstrate leadership in
this area. This will not only help the proponents of globalization in
their debate, but will truly alleviate the situation in the developing
countries.
The World Trade Organization is assuming a more important role and
greater influence than the U.N. in the world today. Consequently, it
warrants certain responsibilities. The WTO and its member countries must
be dedicated to finding ways to meet its stated objectives of
"conducting trade and economic endeavor with a view to raising the
standards of living of the populations of member nations, to ensure full
employment of their economies, to promote the steady growth of real
incomes and effective demand in their markets, to expand the production
of and trade in goods and services, while allowing for the optimal use
of the world's reserves in accordance with the objective of
sustainable development, and protecting and preserving the environment,
and in a manner consistent with the respective needs and concerns of
Members at different levels of development."
Mexican intellectual and politician, Castillo Peraza distinguishes
between globalization and "worldization"--aliteral translation
from Latin (Enrique Iglesias, 1999). He says--"Why do the Latin
languages make this distinction? Because for us, the globe is something
physical, whereas the worm is a human thing, with people, families,
nations in it. Therefore, what we need to try is to humanize
globalization, and, in this context, speak a little more about the
world." That spirit of pursuing globalization to the advantage of
the majority of the people living in the developing world is imperative.
Neglecting the majority may prove to be futile, if not disastrous.
REFERENCES
Barnevik, P. (2001) "Growth Spur," Worldlink-The magazine
of the World Economic Forum, September/October.
Iglesias, E. (1999) "Advantages and risks of Globalization:
the ease of Latin America," The Global Press Meeting, Washington,
June.
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Society for
Competitiveness Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.