Mississippi school districts and counties have lost a round in
their legal effort to recover damages from companies that formerly made
lead-based paint, with the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling a
federal judge was wrong to reject a manufacturer's attempt to win a
single declaratory judgment.
"Federalism and comity concerns weigh in favor of the federal
court exercising its discretion to decide this case," U.S. District
Judge Lee Rosenthal wrote for the three-judge panel in Sherwin-Williams
Co. v. Holmes County et al. (02-60578).
"Sherwin-Williams properly invoked diversity jurisdiction to
litigate in a single forum issues that would arise in a number of suits
it anticipated facing in different state courts, a reason consistent
with the Declaratory Judgment Act," he said.
The company sought the declaratory judgment after media reports
that the school districts and counties, and their lawyers, intended to
file a number of lead-paint abatement suits in different counties in
Mississippi.
It asked a federal judge to declare that:
* The First Amendment prevents imposing liability on
Sherwin-Williams based on its membership in the Lead Industries
Association or any other trade association, its petitioning government
agencies or its public expressions of opinion.
* The Federal Hazardous Substances Act, with which Sherwin-Williams
complied, preempts any claims the company subsequently failed to warn
about the dangers of its products.
* Sherwin-Williams is not the proximate cause of injuries unless
one of its products is identified as creating a lead-paint hazard in a
particular school.
* The company has no duty to reimburse the counties and school
districts for costs of maintenance, operations, renovations, repair,
testing, inspection or abatement associated with lead paint.
Sherwin-Williams also sought an injunction prohibiting the school
districts and counties from filing any suit violating the declaration.
The federal judge decided against issuing the declaratory judgment
after considering seven factors set forth by the Fifth Circuit in St.
Paul Insurance Co. v. Trejo. Among other things, the judge said handling
all the cases in a single federal court would inconvenience some of the
plaintiffs, and Sherwin-Williams was forum shopping, .
Sherwin-Williams appealed, and the Fifth Circuit rejected the
reasoning. "Any marginal inconvenience is outweighed by the other
factors that weigh with proceeding with the federal declaratory
judgment," it said, and the company wasn't forum shopping.
COPYRIGHT 2003 JR Publishing,
Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.