Budgets are getting squeezed--time to invest in
learning?
by Bordonaro, Frank P.
If you believe a tough economy can spur creativity, this is the
best time in the past 10 years to rethink, refresh, and revitalize your
learning strategy. Place your company on a faster track toward the
future while dealing with financial constraint.
For many organizations, no area will be hit harder during budget
time than learning, and many of you may have already entered a period of
tight or declining budgets. CEOs began tightening up on expenses
somewhere between early 2001 and early 2002. Regardless of where you may
mark the beginning of your own funding squeeze, you will probably agree
it has arrived, and will continue at least into 2004.
Training magazine, in its last annual issue coveting training
investments, reported that the rosy spending plans collected in spring
were followed by cancellations and retrenchments throughout the
industry. Training estimated, for example, that a third of the
leadership sessions planned were "simply not held." In its
October 2003 survey, the magazine reports employers' expenditures
were down again, marking the first two-year consecutive decline since
1982. Given the tendency of our function to trail broad investment
indicators like capital spending and the stock market, we can expect to
be wearing fight belts for some time.
Thinner "actuals" in the current year will signal to
budget reviewers that next year's plan should be even leaner.
Ponying up a fair share of expense reductions is only fight, but do not
assume a defensive posture while doing so. Without new thinking, one is
backed awkwardly into a lame position: "Well, the company survived
just fine without doing the things we proposed a year ago, so this year
we are re-proposing last year's stuff, scaled down."
Is There A Better Approach?
We can gain confidence from recognizing that learning has matured
from a discretionary curiosity into a viable function of business. Lean
budgets have slowed its breadth of application, but not its innovative
edge. Tough times have forced a new sense of discipline, moved the
action closer to the customer, improved the measurement of return on
learning, intercepted and incorporated recent advances in technology,
sharpened the quality of choices in the outsourced world, and infused
the field with a keener sense of accountability for the success of the
business. By tapping into this tougher, new learning, our plans can be a
breath of fresh air, rather than a pale, downsized version of the recent
past.
Here are four suggestions for staging a lean-but-exciting new year,
one your clients and top management can look forward to: 1. Link
learning to the company's future. Declare immediately that your new
learning plan will not be the faded edge of a difficult downturn, but
"Year One" of a new three-year cycle of increased innovation
and positive impact on the company.
Set aside the debates among economists, pollsters, and investors,
over the timing, strength, and speed of the recovery. These are details.
Assume the recovery is not only happening now, but is beginning to
impact your business. Ask: "How will our company be different in
the improved economy? What investments will we have made in the business
to make us stronger against competition? What new abilities as a total
organization will we have demonstrated three years from now?"
Make it a top priority to become literate on the best
senior-management thinking on these questions, and tell everyone your
strategy is to make management's job easier in getting where they
want to go. If, after trying hard, you can't get these answers from
management, say so, and make getting them to the answers your priority.
Write the opening slide of your plan today, declaring it the first of
three annual installments in service to those three questions.
2. Take the offensive: Throw out some "comfortable habit"
investments and figure up the savings. This step requires a mindset
adjustment. It is not necessarily wise to lead with your strength if
"strength" is defined as the initiatives that are the least
controversial-or most acceptable--to the organization, your staff, or
yourself.
* That middle management course on leadership skills the company
started seven years ago and the COO loves? Cancel it for two years and
see if there is any measurable impact on the business.
* Finally succeeded in getting half your training offerings on
line? Cheap but bad is no value. Take a close look at those e-courses
and be prepared for a possible quality letdown. Pare back bad courses,
renegotiate and find new sources if necessary. Postpone online offerings
that don't meet standards. Begin a three-year ramp-up of newer,
better courses.
* That open enrollment course on "finance for non-financial
managers" still getting glowing ratings from all attendees? Scrap
it. Accounting literacy is not business literacy, and measurement means
little if your people don't know their place in the recovery.
* Your learning back office received a customer service award this
year? Consider outsourcing the operation to a Learning Management System
shop.
Make your own list of opportunities. Identify your top four or five
comfortable habits and run scenarios in which you no longer perform
them.
3. Reallocate your spending. Fund your own new ventures, committing
to some things you have never tried. My recent tour of some learning
hotspots reminded me how poorly innovation conforms to economic
expansions and contractions in the economy. The recent slump has turned
the lights out on some promising projects, but has also spurred new
thinking and, with it, tests of new tools and methods. Besides, the
adaptation process is rapid in a recovery; anticipate that today's
wild new experiment will quickly become tomorrow's competitive
standard.
A Nimble Giant. Residential real estate giant Century 21, with
88,000 brokers, knows all about the challenges of running a complex
learning support system. Before they reinvented their field training, a
staff of 4,500 trainers swarmed the 6,600 office operation, running
classrooms of franchisees through manuals produced by a large central
staff. Today the same massive task is handled by just 150 "roving
master" trainers who collaborate with local manager-coaches and a
handful of central-office designers. The learning load grows daily. To
compete, brokers need skills in Power Point, digital photography,
web-based advertising, and wireless office management, to name a few.
Century 21's svelte system handles it all.
How do they do it? First, the company figured out which content was
absolutely crucial in order for brokers to produce income. All learning
content and objectives were then geared to that simple goal. Media
selections were made with an eye to optimum value and ease of
distribution, rather than maximum use of the latest, leading-edge
technology (no streaming video where tapes will do). The learning group
made access easy, offering 120 hours of free online learning, holding
online, live classes and making virtual classroom learning at home an
attractive option for many.
Century 21's financial results are bard to fault. Attrition,
the cost monster of all storefront-based businesses, was cut in half in
the first two years of the new operation, while agent income grew by 16
percent. All of this saw the firm through a 145-percent expansion of the
agent population, a growth hard to contemplate under the older,
higher-turnover conditions. Cost of training? This ran above prior years
in the inaugural cycle, then dipped below historic levels and has stayed
there. Doing more with less? I'd say so.
Action Learning in Defiance of Distance. Xerox, determined to hang
onto its next-generation executive talent and laced with tightening
budgets, challenged the Center for Creative Leadership (CCL) to help it
revise its development of emerging leaders. A couple of years ago CCL,
which has built its reputation in the face-to-face world, joined Xerox
to take a firm step into cyberspace. CCL recast the classic "action
learning" model into a blend of learning modalities. In-person
interactions were reserved for problem selection, team building, online
workspace practice, and presentations to management. Online work was
sandwiched between the face-to-face sessions. Self- assessment tools
were repurposed for desktop use, and most of the project work was
performed online by the geographically dispersed teams.
By orchestrating the modules for mutual support and providing
coaches and tutorial help, the new model achieved efficiencies. The
six-month elapsed program time replaced an earlier two-year version,
while delivery and tuition costs were reduced by 60 percent. Encouraged,
Xerox expanded the effort to Europe, where the second iteration in that
region, involving 14 countries, is underway. The company is refining
such features as problem selection and sponsorship, while conforming
closely to the original design. Meanwhile, CCL continues to strengthen
its foothold in blended learning.
Taking Aim at Productivity. Pepsi, First Data, J.P. Morgan Chase,
and Midwest utility Ameren are among a few pioneering companies that
have used learning to help their people improve performance at the
immediate point of action. All are clients of Root Learning, Inc., the
innovator in visual-based business literacy.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Human Resource Planning
Society Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.