legislated review mechanism
Administrative Rules Prescribed code of conduct designed to
(Regulations & Permits) control, or govern, behavior
Enforcement Penalties Empowering statute contains a framework
for enforcement of compliance and
penalties for noncompliance
Prescribed Legal Support Mechanism fixed in statute giving the
program access to legal support
Development of Guidelines Written material that leads stakeholders
through a desired or required process;
following the guidelines should result in
substantive adherence to applicable
statutes and regulations
Adequate Funding Enough monies allocated to fulfill either
a formal or informal mandate
Providing Project Financing Program allocation of monies specifically
for supporting external projects that
further the agency's goals
Cooperative/ Collaborative Active engagement of all interested and
Planning Process affected stakeholders providing them with
open and meaningful input into the
planning process and outcome
Alternative Dispute A process for resolving conflicts that
Resolution involves some form of negotiation aimed
towards consensus and does not use
traditional court proceedings
Public Educational & A specific, structured program aimed at
Informational Programs disseminating information to increase
stakeholders' knowledge and understanding
Public/Peer Review A conscious decision by the agency to
pursue public accountability by
incorporating public and scientific
scrutiny of planning and implementation
Public Advisory Bodies Agencies offering nonbinding directions
and recommendations staffed by public
representatives
Technical Advisory Bodies Agencies offering nonbinding directions
and recommendations staffed by scientific
or technical professionals
representatives
Providing Technical A structured program for disseminating
Assistance technical information through contact
with agency staff, including process
design
Multijurisdictional Processes that involve more than one
Cooperation jurisdiction and that transgress
political boundaries such as county,
regional district, state, province, or
country borders
Ecosystem-Based Management Considers ecological, economic and social
factors in determining how to best
maintain and enhance environmental
quality
Adaptive Management Monitoring and research conducted to
Techniques adjust future implementation as more is
learned about the systems and how they
respond to management efforts
Indicators/Performance A quantitative value that attempts to
Measures gauge the degree of attainment of an
objective or target
Cumulative Effects Management Changes to the environment caused by the
interaction of natural ecosystem
processes with the effects of two or more
management practices
Conduct Management Activities Applying a watershed-scale perspective to
at Watershed Level planning implementation of program
elements
Special Defined-Management Demarcated areas and zones where
Zones or Areas development and management activities are
either prescribed or prohibited
GIS for Management/Planning Utilizing the information contained in a
system to better understand the spatial
aspects of an area
Resource Inventories A detailed list of the supply of
resources in an area; resources can
include intangibles aesthetic values
State of the Periodic documentation of the state of
Environment/Sustainability nature within a program's jurisdiction
Reporting
Source: Calbick 2003: 194-195
References Cited
Brouha, Paul. 2003. Personal communication with director of
Strategic Planning and Resource Assessment, United States Department of
Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
Burby, Raymond. 2003. Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement
and Government Action. Journal of the American Planning Association
69(3): 33-49.
Calbick, K.S. 2003. The Use of Program Theory for Identifying and
Evaluating 'Best Practices' for Implementing Land-Use
Policies. Master's of Resource Management, School of Resource and
Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.
California. 1999. McAteer-Petris Act. California Government Code
66600-66682 as amended through the 1999 legislative session.
Dohrmann, John. 2002. Personal communication with policy director,
Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team, Olympia, Wash.
Fraser Basin Council (FBC). 1997. Charter for Sustainability.
Vancouver, B.C.
Gunton, T.I., and Catherine Ponsford. 2000. Environmental Research
Priorities in British Columbia. Report prepared for the B.C. Ministry of
Environment, Lands and Parks. Victoria, B.C.
Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 1999. Consensus Building and
Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative
Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 412-422.
Litke, Steve. 2002. Personal communication with project
coordinator, Fraser Basin Council, Vancouver, B.C.
Margerum, Richard D.. 1999. Getting Past Yes: From Capital Creation
to Action. Journal of the American Planning Association 56(2): 81-191.
Marshall, David. 2002. Personal communication with executive
director, Fraser Basin Council, Vancouver, B.C.
Oregon. Department of Land Conservation and Development. 2000.
1999-2001 Biennial Report to the Seventy-First Legislative Assembly.
Salem, Ore.
--. 1973. Senate Bill 100. Oregon Legislative Assembly, 1973
regular Session.
Rossi, Peter H., Howard E. Freeman, and Mark W. Lipsey. 1999.
Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage
Publications.
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC).
2001. San Francisco Bay Plan. San Francisco.
--. 2000. Draft Long-Term Management Strategy Management Plan. San
Francisco: San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
Smith, Elaine. 2002. Personal communication with Department of Land
Conservation and Development liaison, Community Solutions Office, Salem,
Ore.
Travis, Will. 2002. Personal communication with executive director,
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, San
Francisco, Calif.
United States. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 2000.
Strategic Plan (2000 Revision)--Integrity and Accountability: A
Framework for Natural Resource Management. Washington, D.C.
Washington. 2000. Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team (PSWQAT).
Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. Olympia, Wash.
--. 1999. Puget Sound Water Quality Protection Act. Chapter 90.71
RCW as amended to 1999.
Weiss, Carol H. 1998. Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and
Policies. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Author Biographies
Educated in environmental engineering at the British Columbia
Institute of Technology, Ken Calbick received his Masters of Resource
Management at Simon Fraser University. For his graduate work, Ken
studied the best practices used by several North American planning
agencies for implementing land use policies designed to alleviate
conflicts. He can be reached through Simon Fraser University's
School of Resource and Environmental Management or by email at
kcalbick@shaw.ca.
Chad Day is the founding director and adjunct professor of the
School of Resource and Environmental Management (REM) at Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, BC. His research focuses on institutions for
integrated land and water management and environmental planning. He can
be reached through the School or by email at jday@sfu.ca.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Wilfrid Laurier
University Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.