"FOR YEARS ASSOCIATIONS HAVE BANKED ON AFFINITY programs and
recycled ideas to provide value for dues," says Dawn Moliterno,
president and CEO of Introspect Associates, Ltd., Canfield, Ohio.
"Offering members a one-size-fits-all benefits package can and will
always be a challenge. So associations are left with this quandary: How
can you realistically raise dues without adding value and not watch your
retention numbers dwindle?"
Faced with this question, many associations are rethinking their
membership structures. One of the most common structures used by both
trade and professional associations is the fair-share structure where
membership categories, benefits, and dues are determined by a specific
characteristic of the individual or company. For example, a trade
association might determine its company member dues based on annual
revenue, and an individual membership organization might set dues based
on professional specialty categories.
This model has proven problematic for some associations, however,
because while all members receive the same benefits, some pay higher
dues based on the established criteria.
As a result of member discontent with the aforementioned model,
more organizations are exploring a tiered membership structure in which
membership and subsequently dues are based on membership levels or
benefits packages rather than on categories determined by specific
demographic criteria. "Embracing one of the fastest growing trends
nationwide, more associations are turning to a tiered membership
structure to replace outdated dues structures that do not communicate
value to members," says Moliterno, who has worked with several
organizations in their transition from a fair-share model to a tiered
membership structure. She outlines these primary reasons for the switch:
To give members control and choices. A tiered structure
accommodates companies regardless of size (or individuals regardless of
professional specialty) and ensures appropriate investment for the
resulting delivery of services and products. Participants customize
their memberships by selecting their levels of involvement and
investment.
To realign business purposes to match customer needs. A tiered
membership structure allows associations to easily adapt to rapid change
and significant competitive challenges because they can adjust their
benefits to address new trends while adding value to their memberships
at specific levels. They can also demonstrate a return on investment for
members, since the tiers are segmented to match specific products and
services to member needs and desires.
To create one clear and concise message. Often, members say that
they don't know what they receive for their dues. When shown the
tiered concept, however, members appreciate the compartmentalized areas
of information that they can easily digest.
HDI--an association based in Colorado Springs, Colorado, that
provides professional development for technical support staff--offers
five levels of membership, ranging from bronze to platinum-plus and
priced from $75 to $1,295 per year. The Detroit Regional Chamber has a
similar model. It offers four primary tiers, ranging from business
builder to gold and priced from $495 to $5,700 per year. Both
organizations established their levels with the goal of generating more
revenue and increasing retention. In the articles that follow,
you'll learn how each organization implemented its tiered
structure.
Going for the Platinum
HDI HAS ALWAYS HAD a membership structure based on tiers or
different levels of membership. During the past 15 years, we've
expanded from two to five levels--bronze, silver, gold, platinum, and
platinum-plus, ranging in price from $75 to $1,295. In 1989, we started
with two basic levels of membership, and then we built up and down from
there to address the different needs of the organization. We have always
felt that the tiered membership structure enabled us to achieve the
highest revenue per member as well as higher retention rates. Our
approach is to focus on upgrading members to higher levels of membership
at renewal time rather than simply renewing them at the same level every
year.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Currently, HDI has 6,000 individual members in the United
States--7,500 members worldwide. Our members are customer service and
technical support professionals who work in help desk and support center
operations. They value our certification programs, online training, and
annual meetings.
HDI's membership is divided 50-50 between those who have
memberships at the gold or lower levels and those who have memberships
at the platinum and platinum-plus levels. Our goal is to upgrade people
to the next level during the term of their memberships. We have an
online calculator for that purpose so that members are readily aware
that not only can they renew electronically, but also they can upgrade
their memberships and receive additional benefits and services, such as
more copies of industry publications, access to online training, and
self-evaluation tools.
Overall, the tiered dues membership structure has been successful
for us, and we've learned some important lessons as we've
worked to reinforce the value of membership.
Member input. We believe in asking our members what they want and
then giving it to them. We have a member advisory board, and we value
its guidance. Before making any changes to programs or membership
levels, we present our plans to this board. In addition, we have an
annual summit with our local chapter leaders every summer to solicit
their input.
When we first considered introducing the platinum-plus membership,
we actually polled our members to find out what additional deliverables
they wanted to receive. For example, we asked them how many additional
staff people they wanted to receive benefits from the membership along
with the primary member. They told us five or six people, primarily
middle managers, so we built the membership that way. In the first year
that platinum-plus was available, we recruited 1,000 members at this
level. Today, 30 percent of our members are platinum-plus.
Retention. Our retention rate is better at the higher levels of
membership because our members see the value in all the deliverables
that they receive. Members were pleased when we introduced the
platinum-plus membership because they wanted our highest level of
service, and they were willing to pay for it.
Our overall retention rate is 60 percent, and we are working toward
our goal of achieving a 65 percent retention rate. The retention rate
for our platinum and platinum-plus members is more than 70 percent. We
believe this is the case because these memberships are tied to an
organization. While there is one member of record, multiple staff
members at the organization's site are taking advantage of HDI
membership benefits. Renewing silver and gold memberships is more
difficult because people change jobs, and it's hard to maintain
contact with them. We truly believe that this is the reason we lose
members. It's not because members don't value our
deliverables.
Administration. The tiered dues membership structure has helped us
resolve specific administrative challenges, while creating others as our
benefit offerings become more complex. For example, the bronze
membership was introduced to help us manage our relationship with local
chapters more effectively and it has improved that administrative
problem. Basically, we collect the dues for HDI's nearly 60 local
chapters in the United States and Canada and send them the money to fund
their operations. Prior to introducing the bronze membership, we
didn't have any records for our local chapters. Local chapter
members would call the national headquarters requesting their discounts
on meeting registration and other products, and we had no information
about them. Having the bronze membership solved this problem.
On the other hand, we have experienced some administrative
challenges with our higher-end memberships. Pulling data to ensure that
members receive the benefits to which they're entitled still
involves some manual work. Further, our biggest challenge with the
platinum and platinum-plus memberships has been devising a way to attach
or connect people to companies. For example, if the member record is not
updated properly, people may continue receiving discounts after their
organizations' membership has expired.
For the most part, we've achieved our goals using the tiered
structure, and we do not anticipate modifying our current membership
levels a great deal. Of course, any additional services and benefits
will be added at the higher membership levels. Our continuing challenge
will be to reinforce value to our members.
HDI's Membership Tiers Comparison
BRONZE SILVER GOLD PLATINUM PLATINUM-
COPYRIGHT 2005 American Society of Association
Executives Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.