Abstracts of second- and third-place undergraduate
papers.
"An Analysis of the Decline in Hunting Participation in
Alberta." Harper, Dana, University of Alberta, second-place winner.
This paper presents an analysis of the demand for hunting licenses
in Alberta from 1968 to 2004. Regression analysis was used to estimate
the effects of some of the commonly thought reasons for the decline in
hunting participation in Alberta; specifically, the effects of changes
in wildlife certificate prices, species license prices, income levels,
and the proportion of the population living in urban areas. I found that
hunting appears to be an inferior good since the income elasticity of
demand was elastic--as provincial income levels increase, it is expected
that less people will participate in hunting. In addition, the price
elasticity of demand was inelastic indicating that raising license
prices could theoretically generate increased revenues for wildlife
management. I further hypothesize that if hunting participation needs to
be increased for wildlife management purposes, it can be accomplished by
decreasing the prices of licenses without directly affecting the revenue
generated. Ultimately, we must realize that many of the hypothesized
reasons for the decline in hunting participation in Alberta are
qualitative and non-economic in nature and are thus difficult to include
in most analyses. Whereas price and income are important determinants of
hunting demand, they are only part of the story.
"Eggsactly What Attitudes Drive Consumer Egg Purchases?"
Boyd, Curtis D., University of Alberta, third-place winner.
In an attempt to increase household expenditure on shell eggs,
producers have differentiated production to offer consumers a multitude
of specialty egg varieties. These varieties lie in one of two general
classifications; eggs which are nutritionally enhanced, and those which
are produced under alternate production techniques yet are otherwise
nutritionally equivalent to their generic counterparts. This study uses
two surveys developed in 2005 and 2006 focusing on consumer attitudes,
potentially impacting egg preferences. The data were then analyzed with
a multinomial logit regression utilizes attitude factor scores and
demographic characteristics. This study reveals what consumer attitudes
and demographic traits are associated with preferences for vegetarian,
free-run, organic, vitamin-enhanced and omega-3-enhanced egg types with
two significant conclusions.
It is first shown that consumers have a strong preference for
free-run eggs and second that there appears to be confusion surrounding
egg attributes. This is revealed by the result that health conscious
consumers show a greater willingness to pay (WTP) for free-run,
vegetarian or organic eggs, while revealing a negative WTP for
nutritionally enhanced varieties (omega-3 and vitamin-enhanced).
Deciphering consumer attitudes towards egg varieties is an
important aspect of developing marketing strategies, predicting policy
change implications and in understanding consumer views towards industry
directions. Proliferation of differentiated products may not increase
demand in the targeted segments, it may confuse consumers.
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Agricultural Economics
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.