(12.) See INT'L OLYMPIC COMM., OLYMPIC CHARTER, at 9 (2004)
[hereinafter OLYMPIC CHARTER], available at
http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/missions/charter_uk.asp
(identifying the six Fundamental Principles of Olympism). The Olympic
Committee's goal is to "bull[d] a peaceful and better world by
educating youth through sport practised in accordance with Olympism and
its values." Id. at 10.
(13.) See id. at 8 (reflecting on the history of the modern Olympic
Games that were first celebrated in Athens, Greece, in 1896).
(14.) Official Website of the Olympic Movement, supra note 11.
(15.) Official Website of the Olympic Movement, Beijing 2008:
Election, http://www.olympic.org/uk/games/beijing/election_uk.asp (last
visited Oct. 14, 2006). For a detailed description of the voting
process, a list of member countries, and how they voted see id.
(16.) Id.
(17.) See INT'L OLYMPIC COMM., REPORT OF THE IOC EVALUATION
COMMISSION FOR THE GAMES OF THE XXIX OLYMPIAD IN 2008, at 5 (2001),
available at http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_299.pdf. The
Commission considers technical factors such as legal issues, customs and
immigration formalities, environmental protection and meteorology,
finance, marketing, medical/health, security, accommodation, transport,
technology, and communications and media services. Id. at 58-73.
(18.) Id. at 5.
(19.) Id.
(20.) OLYMPIC CHARTER, supra note 12, at 9.
(21.) Id.
(22.) See Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A
(III), at 74, art. 17, U.N. GAOR, 3d Sess., 1st plen. mtg., U.N. Doc.
A/810 (Dec. 12, 1948) [hereinafter UDHR]; International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), art. 1, 21
U.N. GAOR Sup. (No. 16), U.N. Doc. A/6316 (Dec. 16, 1966) [hereinafter
ICESCR]; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art. 12,
G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16), U.N. Doc. A/6316
(Dec. 16, 1966) [hereinafter ICCPR].
(23.) OLYMPIC CHARTER, supra note 12, at 9. The Olympic Charter
does not define "universal fundamental ethical principles."
This Comment assumes "universal fundamental ethical
principles" are equivalent to universal human rights found in
international agreements.
(24.) One example of a fundamental element of Western property law
is the "right to exclude," which includes exclusion of the
government. See Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164, 179-80
(1979) C[T]he 'right to exclude,' so universally held to be a
fundamental element of the property right, falls within th[e] category
of interests that the Government cannot take without compensation."
(footnote omitted)).
(25.) Jonas Alsen, An Introduction to Chinese Property Law, 20 MD.
J. INT'L L. & TRADE 1, 5 (1996). The first Western property law
ideology introduced in China was an adaptation of the German Civil Code,
Das Burgerliches Gersetzbuch, or "BGB." Id.
(26.) Id.; see Karl Madrene Larson, Comment, A Lesson in Ingenuity:
Chinese Farmers, The State, and The Reclamation of Farmland for Most Any
Use, 7 PAC. RIM L. & POL'Y J. 831, 834 (1998) (explaining the
Chinese government confiscated land from landlords and wealthy farmers
through means of "persuasion, intimidation, and confiscation"
so they could divide it among all farmers equally).
(27.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 43.
(28.) Collectivization is "a politico-economic system
characterized by collective control [especially] over production and
distribution of goods and services...." WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW
INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 445 (Philip Babcock Gove ed., 1986).
(29.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 4344.
(30.) The Great Leap Forward was an economic program launched in
1958 that was "designed to expand the flow of food and raw
materials from China's traditional, labor
intensive sector of the economy to fuel the growth of the
capital-intensive industrial sector." David Ben Kay, Comment, The
Patent Law of the People's Republic of China in Perspective, 33
UCLA L. REV. 331, 347 (1985).
(31.) A commune is a "community of people who share property
and responsibility." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 295 (Bryan Garner
ed., 8th ed. 2004).
(32.) Larson, supra note 26, at 834.
(33.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 44.
(34.) Id. at 5.
(35.) China introduced an economic reform strategy in December of
1978, beginning with agricultural reform in the rural sector. Michele A.
Wong, Comment, China's Direct Marketing Ban: A Case Study of
China's Response to Capital-Based Social Networks, 11 PAC. RIM L.
& POL'Y J 257, 260 (2002); see also Communique of the Third
Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party
of China, 21 PEKING REV. 11 (Dec. 29, 1978) [hereinafter Communique] (on
file with author).
(36.) See Communique, supra note 35, at 12-13.
(37.) Id. at 12.
(38.) "The PRC has had five constitutions;" the current
constitution is the 1982 version. Alsen, supra note 25, at 7.
(39.) XIAN FA [Constitution] art. 10 (1982) (P.R.C.) (promulgated
Dec. 4, 1982 by the Fifth National People's Congress of the P.R.C.
at its Fifth Session); see also Elaine Sit, Comment, Broken Promises:
The Status of Expropriated Property in the People's Republic of
China, 3 ASIAN L.J. 111, 140 (1996) ("Not unexpectedly, [the 1982
constitution] explicitly set forth the principle that land in the cities
was owned by the sate and land in rural and suburban areas was owned by
collectives.").
(40.) XIAN FA art. 13 (1982) (P.R.C.); Sit, supra note 39, at
140-41.
(41.) Sit, supra note 39, at 141.
(42.) General Principles of Civil Law of the People's Republic
of China (adopted by the Fourth Session of the Sixth Nat'l
People's Cong., Apr. 12, 1986, effective Jan. 1, 1987) translated
in, 52 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 27-87 (Whitmore Gray & Harry
Ruiheng Zheng trans.) (1989).
(43.) Id. art. 75; see also Sit, supra note 39, at 141.
(44.) Sit, supra note 39, at 141.
(45.) Land Administration Law of the People's Republic of
China (promulgated by the Standing Comm. Nat'l People's Cong.,
Aug. 28, 1998, effective Jan. 1, 1999), ch. II, art. 13, translated at
http://www.lawinfochina.com/dispecontent.asp?db=1&id=3673 (last
visited Oct. 14, 2006).
(46.) Id. art. 16; see also Sit, supra note 39, at 141 (reviewing
the provisions of the Land Administration Law of China).
(47.) Sit, supra, note 39, at 142; XIAN FA art. 10 (P.R.C) (amended
1988).
(48.) XIAN FA art. 10 (1982) (P.R.C.).
(49.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 12 n.45. Article 11 of the
constitution, located between Article 10's ownership rights and
Article 13's private property rights, protects the lawful rights
and interests of the private sector of the economy. See XIAN FA arts.
10, 11 & 13 (1982) (P.R.C.).
(50.) XIAN FA art. 13 (1982) (P.R.C.).
(51.) Compare XIAN FA art. 10 (1982) (P.R.C.) with XIAN FA art. 13
(1982) (P.R.C.) (specifically noting that Article 10 declares the State
and collectives own the land in China, whereas Article 13 only protects
the citizen's right to "income, savings, houses, and other
lawful property").
(52.) XIAN FA arts. 10, 11 & 13 (P.R.C.) (amended 2004); see
also Frank Xianfeng Huang, The Path to Clarity: Development of Property
Rights in China, 17 COLUM. J. ASIAN L. 191, 193 n.6 (2003-2004)
(explaining the three amendments pertain to: sanctification of
individual property rights, elevating the status of the nonpublic
sector, and providing closer control over government expropriation of
private property).
(53.) XIAN FA art. 13 (P.R.C.) (amended 2004); see also Frank
Xianfeng Huang, supra note 52, at 193 ("All legal private
properties of citizens, regardless of forms, are explicitly made
inviolable.").
(54.) XIAN FA art. 11 (P.R.C.) (amended 2004); see also Frank
Xianfeng Huang, supra note 52, at 193 (explaining, under the new
constitutional amendments, nonpublic sectors of the economy are
protected as well as "specifically encouraged and supported").
(55.) XIAN FA art. 10 (P.R.C.) (amended 2004) ("The State may,
in the public interest and in accordance with the provisions of law,
expropriate or requisition land for its use and shall make compensation
for the land expropriated or requisitioned."); XIAN FA art. 13
(P.R.C.) (amended 2004) ("The State may, in the public interest and
in accordance with law, expropriate or requisition private property for
its use and shall make compensation for the private property
expropriated or requisitioned."); see also Frank Xianfeng Huang,
supra note 52, at 193 nn.9-10 (noting compensation must be made if the
government either expropriates property with an ownership change or
property use without ownership change).
(56.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 46.
(57.) See id (commenting on the vast amounts of land taken for
housing construction as Chinese cities grew after new land regulations
gave land value).
(58.) Technically, the government is not "taking" its
citizens' land in the traditional Western sense of expropriating
land owned by private individuals. In China, the State already
"owns" the land in question. XIAN FA art. 10 (1982) (P.R.C.).
Regardless of this pedagogically technical distinction, the Chinese
government is essentially taking its citizens' right to use the
land. This Comment does not suggest China adopt a private property
system. See discussion of property rights in socialist societies infra
Part IV. For ease of readability, when the Author refers to
"takings" in China, she implies the broader understanding of
property rights, including the right to use land.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Houston Journal of International
Law Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.