(157.) Arambulo, supra note 148, at 114. The International Bill of
Human Rights also technically includes the Optional Protocol of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Jiangyu Wang,
supra note 7, at 138. The Optional Protocol can be found at Second
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights: Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty, G.A. Res. 44/128,
at 207, U.N. GAOR, 44th Sess., Supp. No. 49, U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (Dec.
1989).
(158.) Jiangyu Wang, supra note 7, at 138.
(159.) Id. at 143.
(160.) INFO. OFFICE OF THE STATE COUNCIL 2000, supra note 153, pt.
VII, para. 2; Davis, supra note 8, at 18.
(161.) ICESCR, supra note 22, art. 11.
(162.) Jiangyu Wang, supra note 7, at 143.
(163.) INFO. OFFICE OF THE STATE COUNCIL 2004, supra note 153, pt.
VII, para. 2 (internal quotations omitted).
(164.) Jiangyu Wang, supra note 7, at 143.
(165.) ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 1, para. 2.
(166.) Id. art. 12, para. 1.
(167.) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not include
the word "unlawful." UDHR, supra note 22.
(168.) ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 17, para. 1.
(169.) UDHR, supra note 22, art. 17.
(170.) Alsen, supra note 25, at 44.
(171.) A freehold is "[a]n estate in land held in fee simple,
in fee tail, or for term of life." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 690
(Bryan Garner ed., 8th ed. 2004). A fee simple, for example, is
"[a]n interest in land that, being the broadest property interest
allowed by law, endures until the current holder dies without
heirs." Id. at 648. A title, in turn, is defined as the
"[l]egal evidence of a person's ownership rights in
property." Id. at 1522.
(172.) See UDHR, supra note 22, art. 17 (not requiring a particular
property regime). Other scholars argue not only that a State without a
private property system will fail to comply with internationally
accepted human rights, but moreover will ensure their own collapse. See,
e.g., Richard Pipes, Human Nature and the Fall of Communism, AM. ACAD.
ARTS & SCI. BULL. 38, 39 (Jan. 1996) CA government that monopolizes
a nation's wealth and prohibits its citizens from accumulating any
property beyond mere personal effects ensures its own
destruction.").
(173.) See supra notes 120-26 and accompanying text.
(174.) For a detailed discussion of the various problems in China
that render the 2004 amendments and other formal rules unenforceable see
Chenglin Liu, supra note 72, at 6-15. "The deep-rooted bias against
private ownership, a weak judiciary, the unrestricted power of the
government and widespread corruption problems are among" the
problems. Id. at 6.
(175.) U.N. Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC], Comm. on Econ., Soc.
and Cultural Rights [CESCR], Implementation of the Int'l Covenant
on Econ., Soc. and Cultural Rights, General Comment 7: The right to
adequate housing (Art. 11 (1) of the Covenant), para. 4, U.N. Doc.
E/C.12/1997/4 (May 20, 1997) [hereinafter CESCR, General Comment 7].
(176.) The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is
entrusted with authoritatively interpreting the ICESCR. Davis, supra
note 8, at 18.
(177.) Id. (quoting CESCR, General Comment 4: The right to adequate
housing (Art. 11 (1) of the Covenant), U.N. Doc. E/1992/23 (Dec. 13,
1991)).
(178.) Id. at 18 (quoting CESCR, General Comment 7, supra note
175).
(179.) U.N. Comm. on Human Rights, Res. 1993/77, para. 1, U.N. Doc.
E/1993/23 (Mar. 10, 1993); see also Office of the High Comm'r for
Human Rights, Res. 1998/9, U.N. Doc. E/CNA/SUB.2/1998/L.11 (Aug. 20,
1998) (declaring "the practice of forced eviction constitutes a
gross violation of a broad range of human rights").
(180.) ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 12, para. 1.
(181.) See Spencer Anderson, Olympic construction in Beijing leaves
thousands homeless: Advance notice and compensation invisible,
METROVOX.CO.UK, Mar. 10, 2005, available at
http://cgmg.jour.city.ac.uk/news.php?story=129 ("The demolition and
relocation of homes to make way for the city's Olympic village has
been occurring at a staggering rate, leaving hundreds of thousands of
Chinese people homeless and frequently without sufficient
compensation.").
(182.) Id. at 13-15.
(183.) Id. at 14 (brackets in original).
(184.) Id. at 15.
(185.) Id. at 15 n.36.
(186.) ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 1, para. 2.
(187.) See, e.g., Will China's Government Uphold the Olympic
Ideal?, supra note 63 (recounting a Beijing resident's imprisonment
after protesting the razing of his two restaurants).
(188.) Feng Changle, Forced Demolition: The Story of Young Chang
Liang's Life, THE EPOCH TIMES, Sep. 1, 2004, available at
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/4-9-1/23080.html (detailing the
numerous tragedies befalling a young Chinese citizen).
(189.) Id.
(190.) Davis, supra note 8, at 14.
(191.) Black's defines arbitrary as "[d]epending on
individual discretion" or "founded on prejudice or preference
rather than on reason or fact." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 112
(Bryan Garner ed., 8th ed. 2004).
(192.) UDHR, supra note 22, art. 12; ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 17,
para. 1.
(193.) See Davis, supra note 8, at 12.
(194.) Collecting the amount of land necessary to construct sports
venues displaces scores of people. See Cynthia Carr, Life in the
Footprint: Voices of the Fading Community in the Shadow of the Atlantic
Yards, VILLAGE VOICE, Aug. 1, 2006, available at
http://www.villagevoice.com/nyclife/0631,carr,74022,15.html (revealing
the proposed 22-acre Atlantic Yards project for the NBA Nets affected
463 residents (renters and owners), 400 people in a homeless shelter,
and many small businesses with a total of 225 employees).
(195.) See Davis, supra note 8, at 14.
(196.) Id. at 12.
(197.) Id. at 15.
(198.) Id.
(199.) Id. at 15-16.
(200.) Id. at 16.
(201.) ICCPR, supra note 22, art. 17, para. 1.
(202.) Davis, supra note 8, at 21.
(203.) Id. at 18.
(204.) Id. at 20-21; CESCR, General Comment 7, supra note 175,
para. 16.
(205.) Davis, supra note 8, at 21.
(206.) Id.
(207.) For the proposition that "fundamental institutional
changes are needed in order to establish a functional body of property
laws in China" and a detailed recommendation see Chenglin Liu,
supra note 72, at 3.
(208.) Cf. Leigh Hornbeck, Tree-cutting Developer Faces $100,000
Fine; Under Stop-work Order Owner Can't Sell 1,400-acre Lake George
Tract, THE TIMES UNION, Feb. 23, 2006, at B1 (reporting a developer was
fined $100,000 for environmental violations).
(209.) Davis, supra note 8, at 12. Human Rights Watch reports
extreme cases where residents return home from work to find
"demolish" written on the walls of their houses, or worse,
their homes have already been destroyed. Id.
(210.) Bede Sheppard, Condemned Communities: Forced Eviction in
Jakarta, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 18, NO. 10(C), Sept. 2006, at 102,
available at http://hrw.org/reports/2006/indonesia0906/indonesia0906web.pdf (suggesting if local authorities assess the impact of eviction they
may "determine whether there is an alternative means of achieving
the public order goal which would cause less harm to the ... evicted
individuals").
(211.) Requiring specific description of individual lots or areas
would decrease the likelihood of developers making "mistakes"
and razing more property than is actually approved or necessary.
(212.) Davis, supra note 8, at 12-13.
(213.) The existence of a system to contest the validity of
governmental taking does not preclude forced evictions. See, e.g., Kelo
v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) (holding governmental taking
to promote economic development may be justified as "public
use").
(214.) Much room exists for arbitrary decisions in determining what
a legitimate "public use" is; however, that debate is outside
the scope of this Comment. Chenglin Liu argues despite the 2004
constitutional amendments requiring a "public purpose" to
seize private property, local Chinese governments over-stretch the scope
of the doctrine approving every conceivable project. Chenglin Liu, supra
note 72, at 7.
(215.) Chenglin Liu, supra note 72, at 16. "Fair market value
should be 'the amount of money which a purchaser willing, but not
obliged, to buy the property would pay to an owner willing, but not
obliged, to sell it.' taking into consideration the other."
Id.
(216.) Yardley, supra note 62, at A8.
(217.) Id.
Martha M. Hopkins, J.D., University of Houston Law Center, expected
2007; B.S. in Political Science, Texas A&M University, 2003. The
Author would like to thank Professor Chenglin Liu for his research
assistance, the Houston Journal of International Law members for their
excellent work, her family for their endless faith and encouragement,
and those particular individuals who passed up much more exciting plans
to give her desired feedback one last time. This Comment received the
2006 Baker Botts, L.L.P. Writing Award for an Outstanding Comment on a
Topic in International Law.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Houston Journal of International
Law Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.