After months of tense bargaining, a cabinet-level committee has
produced a draft law governing Iraq's vast oilfields which would
distribute all revenues through the federal government and grant Baghdad
wide powers in exploration, development and awarding of major
international contracts. The draft, described by several members of the
committee, could still change and must be approved by the Iraqi cabinet
and parliament before it becomes law.
Negotiations have veered off track unexpectedly in the past, and
members of the political and sectarian groups with interest in the law
could still object as they read it more closely. But if approved in
anything close to its present form, the law would appear to settle a
longstanding debate over whether the oil industry and its revenues
should be overseen by the central government or the regions dominated by
Kurds in the north and Shi'ite Arabs in the south, where the
richest oilfields are located.
The draft comes down firmly on the side of central oversight, a
decision which advocates for Iraq's unity are likely to trumpet as
a triumph. Because control of the oil industry touches so directly on
the interests of all Iraq's warring sectarian groups, and therefore
the future of the country, the proposed law has been described as the
most critical piece of pending legislation.
The New York Times on Jan. 19 quoted Iraqi Planning Minister Ali
Baban, a member of the Sunni-dominated Iraqi Islamic Party (IIP) and who
serves on the negotiating committee, as saying: "This [draft) will
give us the basis of the unity of this country. We pushed for the center
in Baghdad, but we didn't neglect the Kurds and other
regions".
Negotiators said the final weeks of wrangling on the draft focused
on a federal committee that will be set up to review the oil contracts.
Kurdish, and to some extent Shi'ite, parties wanted to maintain
regional control over the contracts, while Sunni Arabs, with less oil
resources in territories they dominate, insisted that the federal
committee have the power to approve contracts, rather than just
reviewing them and offering advice.
The negotiators appear to have finessed that issue by allowing the
regions to initiate the process of tendering contracts and by drawing up
an exacting set of criteria to govern the deliberations of the committee
rather than simply relying on its independent discretion. And in a bow
to the Kurds, who objected to the use of the word "approve" in
describing the committee's duties, the draft law says instead that
the committee may review and reject contracts which do not meet the
criteria.
The draft law would radically restructure parts of Iraq's
state-controlled and often lethargic oil industry by giving wide
independence - possibly leading to eventual privatisation - to the
government companies which control things like oil exports, the
maintenance of pipelines and the operation of the oil platforms in the
Persian Gulf. The law would revive the Iraqi National Oil Co. (INOC), a
country-wide umbrella organisation which was essentially shut down by
Saddam Hussein's Ba'thist dictatorship.
At the same time, the law would place substantial administrative
authority outside Baghdad by allowing any region that produces at least
150,000 b/d of oil to create its own operating company, according to Oil
Minister Hussein al-Shahristani, who is a member of a powerful coalition
of Shi'ite political parties and who also serves on the negotiating
committee.
Deputy Prime Minister Barham Saleh, a prominent Kurd from
Suleymaniya who chairs the negotiating committee, said the precise
wording of clauses could still change. Saleh was on Jan. 19 quoted as
saying he was still working to cement support for some provisions in the
draft law, adding: "This is the most important piece of legislation
that Iraq will adopt, and it is not a surprise that it is taking long,
tedious rounds of negotiations. We are close, but we have not yet closed
the deal. We are making progress and need to continue".
The developments come with several additional cautions, not the
least of which is that in Iraq's chaotic wartime environment, even
laws which do get passed can have little impact on the street. In one
example of a document arrived at through similar negotiations,
Iraq's constitution, it remains unclear what effect, if any, many
of the fastidiously negotiated clauses are having in the governance of
Iraq.
While the main political and sectarian groups have been represented
in the negotiations over the oil law, it is still possible that members
of those groups could object as the draft is scrutinised more widely. As
a case in point, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) issued an angry
statement on Jan. 19 criticising an oil ministry spokesman for saying
the oil law had been agreed upon unanimously and put in final form. The
statement said: "Although the process of drafting the oil law is
nearing completion, the important annexes to the law are still
pending".
Some of those annexes will cover things like how to deal with
fields which are already producing crude oil under existing contracts,
how to begin taking bids for drilling new wells in known fields and
exploring areas where currently unknown oilfields could be located.
The committee achieved a breakthrough of sorts in December, when
negotiators took a step towards central control by agreeing that all oil
revenues should first go to the central government before being sent
back to the regions in amounts proportional to population. But the talks
bogged down on the question of whether the committee, to be called the
Federal Oil and Gas Council (FOGC), would be called upon to approve
contracts proposed by the regions or just review those contracts and
offer advice. In its current form, the draft law avoids the word
"approve" and in effect gives the committee veto power.
Whatever the language, Minister Shahristani said the committee will
in fact pass judgment on each contract, even when it originates in a
proposed deal between a company and one of the oil-producing regions.
Shahristani, a prominent Shi'ite scientist, said: "If the
committee decides it does not meet all the conditions, it will reject
it". But he said the committee must make its decision based on
specific guidelines, like a directive to maximise profits for Iraq and
to keep the contracting process transparent.
There are other checks and balances written into the law. For
example, while the regions can propose their own deals, they will have
to work with companies which have been "pre-qualified" in
Baghdad. Directives like that could still generate objections in
Kurdistan, which wants as much freedom as possible to write its own
contracts.
The draft law specifies that technical experts in the Oil Ministry
are to be included in the process at all levels. It is the ministry, for
instance, which will be called upon to write a plan for which oilfields
will be developed and drilled first, and which ones will follow.
The FOAC would simply be called upon to endorse that plan or send
it back for revisions. The Oil Ministry would be closely involved in
developing "model contracts" to be used as templates at all
levels of Iraq's oil industry.
Having an oil law will lay out the rules of the game in Iraq and in
principle make it easier to attract international oil companies (IOCs)
with the resources and expertise which the country so desperately needs.
Still, hovering over all the negotiations is the question of
whether companies will want to come to this country with Iraq in its
current state. Dr Shahristani, for one, says that because of the
financial stakes, companies are already reaching out. He said: "The
international companies keep contacting me, every week, without
exception. They are all very, very keen".
Addressing a news conference in Baghdad on Jan. 21, Minister
Shahristani said the law will pave the way for "transparent and
fair" competition in bids to develop Iraq's oil wealth. The
new law, if approved, is to encourage IOCs with their investment clout
and technology to modernise Iraq's oil sector and meet the
country's goal of doubling the current crude oil production of 2.5
million b/d by 2010. Iraq's proven oil reserves stand at about 115
bn barrels, the world's third largest after Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Dr Shahristani said new oilfields will be added as bids are
submitted by IOCs, adding: "The competition will be transparent and
fair and companies will be chosen according to their modern
technological capabilities to guarantee the highest benefits for Iraqis.
We will not consider their nationalities and we will ignore any contract
that does not achieve the highest benefits".
Shahristani refused to give a timeline for parliamentary action and
did not say how the ministry would negotiate with foreign companies. He
cautioned that attacks against oil installations and employees were
increasing, with 289 people killed over the past year and 179 wounded.
He said: "The ministry is always suffering from these terrorist
attacks. I call on all honest people to co-operate with the Oil Ministry
in order to find those who are attacking the employees of this sector
and provide us with any related information".
Insurgents have frequently targeted oil facilities, pipelines and
employees, disrupting exports and efforts to modernise the industry. The
oil minister again stressed that all Iraqis will share in the profits
amid continuing concern by the Sunni Arabs that they will lose out to
the Shi'ites and Kurds who dominate the country's two chief
oil regions in southern and northern Iraq.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Input Solutions Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.