Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family
perspective.
by Kellermanns, Franz W.^Eddleston, Kimberly A.
Entrepreneurship has been recognized as an important factor
contributing to firm success. Despite the potential benefit of corporate
entrepreneurship to sustain the family firm across generations,
corporate entrepreneurship has been underresearched in the family firm
literature. We investigate how generational involvement, willingness to
change, and the ability to recognize technological opportunities impact
corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. We also examine strategic
planning in family firms as a facilitating process. Our findings suggest
that willingness to change and technological opportunity recognition are
positively related to corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. We
further found strategic planning to significantly moderate the
relationships between (1) generational involvement and (2) technological
opportunity recognition and corporate entrepreneurship. These findings
and implications for management and research are discussed.
Introduction
Corporate entrepreneurship is critical to family firm survival,
profitability, and growth (Rogoff & Heck, 2003; Salvato, 2004).
Corporate entrepreneurship refers to the entrepreneurial activities
within organizations that are designed to revitalize the company's
business by changing its competitive profile or by emphasizing
innovation (Zahra, 1995, 1996). Examples of corporate entrepreneurship
include product innovation, process innovation through research and
development, and the pursuit of new markets (Covin & Selvin, 1991;
Miller, 1983; Zahra, Neubaum, & Huse, 2000). These entrepreneurial
activities promote the continuity and success of the family firm by
contributing to growth in employment and wealth (Upton, Teal, &
Felan, 2001). Indeed, research has shown that corporate entrepreneurship
increases revenue streams, empowers employees, and improves
profitability (Barrett & Weinstein, 1998; Lumpkin & Dess, 1996;
Zahra, 1996). With the competitive landscape of the twenty-first century
becoming increasingly dynamic and uncertain (Hamel, 2000), it is of the
utmost importance that family firms develop an entrepreneurial mindset
that allows them to identify and exploit opportunities in their
environments (Sirmon & Hitt, 2003).
Despite the importance of corporate entrepreneurship to the success
and survival of family firms across generations, few studies have
examined how families influence their firms' entrepreneurial
activities (e.g., Nordqvist, 2005; Rogoff & Heck, 2003; Salvato,
2004). Furthermore, little is known regarding why some family firms are
more successful at corporate entrepreneurship than others (Nordqvist,
2005). While some research portrays family firms as reluctant to invest
in new ventures (Cabrera-Suarez, Saa-Perez, & Almeida, 2001), assume
risk (Morris, 1998), or induce change (Levinson, 1987), other research
suggests that family firms that invest in entrepreneurship have greater
potential for high performance (McCann, Leon-Guerrero, & Haley,
2001). Therefore, in response to a call for research that studies the
influence of the family on corporate entrepreneurship (Aldrich &
Cliff, 2003; Chrisman, Chua, & Steier, 2003; Nordqvist, 2005), this
study examines why some families are better at fostering corporate
entrepreneurship in their firms than others.
In line with Salvato's (2004) research on entrepreneurship in
family firms, Miller's (1983) view of entrepreneurship was used to
frame our study. Miller defines entrepreneurship as "a
multidimensional concept encompassing the firm's actions relating
to product-market and technological innovation, risk taking and
proactiveness" (p. 771). This view of entrepreneurship is widely
accepted in the field (Salvato, 2004; Zahra, 1996), and therefore was
considered in developing our research model.
More specifically, because technological innovation drives
entrepreneurship (Shane, 1993), we examined how the technological
opportunities perceived to be present in a family firm's
environment influence corporate entrepreneurship. The importance of
anticipating, embracing, and inducing change to entrepreneurial thinking
(Miller, 1983) is reflected in our consideration of family members'
willingness to change. In addition, because Miller argues that
researchers need to distinguish different types of firms when examining
entrepreneurial activities, the generational involvement of the family
firm was included. Indeed, Salvato's (2004) research suggests that
the generational involvement of the family firm influences
entrepreneurial activities. Lastly, because strategic planning is
expected to play an important role in a family firm's endeavors
(Salvato, 2004), we investigate strategic planning as a facilitating
process in family firms, i.e., a moderator. We conceptualize strategic
planning as an integrative effort (Ketokivi & Castaner, 2004) that
may help to align family members with organizational priorities, thus
enhancing the effects of technological opportunities, willingness to
change, and generational involvement on corporate entrepreneurship.
Our article contributes to the literature in at least three ways.
First, we add to the corporate entrepreneurship literature by
investigating how variables associated with innovation as well as
variables common to the family firm realm affect corporate
entrepreneurship in family firms. While studies investigating the
antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in nonfamily firms are common
(e.g., Covin & Selvin, 1991; Lumpkin & Dess, 1996; Zahra et al.,
2000) and some initial research has been conducted in midsize
organizations (e.g., Wiklund & Shepherd, 2003b; Zahra et al., 2000),
to our knowledge, this is one of the first empirical studies to examine
corporate entrepreneurship in family firms (for another exploratory
study see Salvato, 2004). Second, we show the culture of the family firm
in regard to perceiving technological opportunities and willingness to
change matters to corporate entrepreneurship. This underscores the
importance of the family in understanding family firm entrepreneurship
and success. Third, we add to the literature on strategic planning by
considering strategic planning as a moderator that helps encourage
corporate entrepreneurship. While strategic planning has not always been
directly linked to organizational performance (for a review see Miller
& Cardinal, 1994), we clearly show that strategic planning can
indirectly enhance corporate entrepreneurship in family firms.
Our article will be structured as follows: After a brief literature
review on corporate entrepreneurship, we will develop our hypotheses and
outline the methods employed in this study. Then, we will report and
discuss our results, outline the implications of our study and conclude
with limitations and avenues for future research.
Literature Review and Theoretical Development
Corporate entrepreneurship has been recognized as an important
factor that contributes to firm success (Zahra, 1996; Zahra, Hayton,
& Salvato, 2004). Corporate entrepreneurship involves a variety of
potential tasks including product innovation, risk taking, and
proactiveness that are aimed to facilitate organizational renewal and
sustainability (Covin & Selvin, 1991; Miller, 1983). As such,
corporate entrepreneurship is seen as an important element in the
survival of family firms because it helps create jobs and wealth for
family members.
However, the decision to invest in corporate entrepreneurship is
not always simple for family firms. Family control imposes capital
constraints that can inhibit family firms from funding entrepreneurial
activities (Carney, 2005). For example, the risks and changes involved
in pursuing entrepreneurial activities may limit a family firm's
investment in corporate entrepreneurship due to their concern for wealth
preservation (Carney, 2005; Chrisman, Chua, & Steier, 2005). In
addition, the decision to invest in corporate entrepreneurship is unique
in family firms because family interests and values are an integral part
of the goals and strategies of a family business (Sharma, Chrisman,
& Chua, 1997). While some family firms appear to have a culture that
supports innovation (Upton et al., 2001) and change (Vago, 2004; Zahra
et al., 2004), other family firms may have little corporate
entrepreneurship because the family may have a desire to maintain the
status quo (Gersick, Davis, Hampton, & Lansberg, 1997; Kepner, 1991)
or they may not perceive opportunities in their environments (Salvato,
2004). As such, in examining corporate entrepreneurship in family firms,
a family perspective that considers family members' attitudes and
values is necessary.
Accordingly, our model, presented in Figure 1, reflects the
attitudes and values that are expected to contribute to corporate
entrepreneurship as suggested by Miller's (1983) work on
entrepreneurship that stresses the importance of technological
innovation and change as well as the need to consider firm types.
Specifically, we propose that perceived technological opportunities,
willingness to change, and generational involvement influence family
firm corporate entrepreneurship. We also investigate strategic planning
as an integrative effort (Ketokivi & Castaner, 2004) that
facilitates corporate entrepreneurship in family firms by aiding in the
sense making of the families' priorities (Weick, 1995) and the
exploitation of strategic initiatives. As such, our model is in line
with research that portrays the ability to recognize opportunities, the
willingness to pursue opportunities, and the strategic planning to
exploit opportunities as key factors that support corporate
entrepreneurship (e.g., Covin & Miles, 1999; Venkataraman, 1997;
West & Farr, 1989). Each of our hypotheses is further developed
later.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Baylor
University Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.