Changing the culture of research administrators at a
public university.
by Sivrais, Sally E.^Disney, Carrie
The Toolkit has proven to be a success and is updated on a regular
basis. RAN Online has not proved to be as useful. However, succeed or
fail, the response of development and implementation provided
empowerment. Sharing information and problem solving online is not yet
comfortable for many research administrators.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The Toolkit synthesizes information from the University's main
Research website (see Table 3 below) with useful links and information
relevant to research administrator's day-to-day work.
3) Cross Departmental Collaboration and Problem Solving
In October 2001, a Sponsored Programs Implementation Team (SPIT)
was commissioned for two years to improve the administration of
sponsored projects at the University. Specifically, SPIT was charged to
validate a list of issues and priorities, to complete a situation
analysis, and to deliver solutions. Many of these issues related to
making central administration more responsive to the needs of
departmental administrators. Others focused on maximizing the value of
the new financial system (PeopleSoft). SPIT was a cross-functional
representation of research administrators from the University of
Michigan's central and departmental level administration.
The SPIT model has created new leadership opportunities for
departmental research administrators. After SPIT's commission
ended, a "Sponsored Projects Advisory Team" (SPA Team) was
formed (http://www. spateam.umich.edu). The SPA Team's basic
purpose is to: discuss new issues and facilitate solutions, address
specific problems as they arise, continue to clarify the roles and
responsibilities of central and academic units, manage communications
about research administration, and evaluate solutions and subsequent
policy and procedure changes.
These types of team efforts have set the standard for collaboration
between departmental research administrators and staff in central
offices. The communication and, in some instances, cultural clashes
which once hindered problem solving are being overcome with the use of
the SPIT model. The existence of this committee has given staff in all
departments across campus the sense of collective support and
responsibility.
4) Recognition Programs
As part of the cultural change, the Office of the Vice President
for Research (OVPR) established the annual Distinguished Research
Administrator and OVPR Exceptional Service Awards. Nominations are
requested campus-wide. The Distinguished Research Administrator Award
honors individual staff members from any department at the University
who have demonstrated distinguished service exemplifying the goals of
professional research administration over a number of years. The OVPR
Exceptional Service Award honors individuals from OVPR or the many units
which report to OVPR, who have made outstanding contributions going
beyond the ordinary fulfillment of the position's job expectations.
In addition to receiving an honorarium and an award plaque, these
research administrators are recognized in front of their peers in an
awards ceremony a RAN meeting.
Results
The success of the changing culture of research administrators has
also impacted other units on the University of Michigan campus. The
following are a few examples.
In June 2005, the University of Michigan's Human Resources and
Affirmative Action department changed the University-wide career family
classification system to assist and enable departments to attract and
retain competent and committed staff. 'Research' was added as
an independent career family, which can be defined as a meaningful
grouping of jobs commonly clustered within a career emphasis
(http://careernavigator. umjobs.org).
A second effort was Financial Operations Sponsored Programs
Office's reorganization from a production line approach to a team
approach, aligning with the departments. In part, this reorganization
was in response to issues identified by the SPIT / SPA teams. The
reorganization effort provided a service-oriented responsiveness to the
operation, as well as bringing significant financial benefits to the
institution, through improved tracking, invoicing, collection,
reconciliation, and reporting. New staff initiatives included building
teams aligned with institutional units, identifying training needs and
how to deliver them, encouraging staff to get involved in professional
organizations and in institutional activities, and job rotations.
A third example is the impact of the research administration
culture on another newly forming campus-wide effort called Business
Intelligence (BI) at the University of Michigan. The BI group is
concerned with transforming enterprise data into information, and
information into knowledge to enhance decision-making and to create
actionable plans that drive effective business activity. Similar to the
research administrators, Business Intelligence (BI) consists of a
multidisciplinary group of individuals from numerous departments across
campus. (http://www.businessintelligence.umich.edu). The BI culture
model is based on the successful sustainable research administration
model.
Conclusions
The University of Michigan has created a recognizable research
administration culture, which is being used as a model for other
internal functional groups. Research Administrators Instructional
Network (RAIN) education is effective in building skills and knowledge.
Research Administrative Network (RAN) meetings have provided a gathering
place and training for the research community. The emphasis on
networking has created an environment where research administrators,
holding many different job titles, are comfortable communicating with
their peers to share information and to problem solve. The
cross-functional problem solving teams (SPIT & SPA) have had a
dramatic impact, not only by creating and implementing solutions to
issues affecting administrators, but also by serving as a model for the
process of crossing boundaries to solve problems. The Office of the Vice
President for Research (OVPR) awards have brought University-wide
recognition to the many contributions of research administrators.
The University of Michigan continues to refine its vision thus
enhancing the culture of professional research administrators. New
approaches are being developed for future success. Educational programs
are created on an on-going basis. A new leadership development program
is being designed collaboratively to prepare the next generation of
research administration leaders. The Sponsored Programs Advisory Team
has transitioned to new leadership and membership. New sub-teams are
being formed to address specific complex issues. There is positive
energy in the research community, making collaborative progress
sustainable.
The strategy for building a research culture has transformed
research administration. It is a model which could bring success to
other colleges and universities that are responding to similar internal
and external changes.
Authors Note
The impetus for this article was a January 12, 2004 Center for
Positive Organizational Scholarship, Positive Link Session presented by
Marvin Parnes, Associate Vice President for Research and Executive
Director, Division of Research Development and Administration, Office of
the Vice President for Research at the University of Michigan. This can
be viewed at http://www.bus.umich.edu/Positive/POS-Research/pastpositivesessions.htm.
References
Beckhard, R., & Pritchard, W. (1992). Changing the Essence: The
Art of Creating and Leading Fundamental Change in Organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and Changing
Organizational Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Lessons in Leadership: It's all about the culture in
Leadership Strategies, 9(6), 2006, p 6, Retrieved 8/15/2006 from
http://www.briefings.com/leadership
Sally E. Sivrais
University of Michigan
Stephen M. Ross School of Business
701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, USA
(734) 763-9266
(734) 615-8999 fax
sivrais@umich.edu
Carrie Disney
University of Michigan
Geriatrics Center/Institute of Gerontology
Table 1. Sample RAIN Training Program Agenda
DAY ONE
Introduction
The Research Administration Environment
Ethics and Compliance
Openness in research; conflict of interest; human subject
protection; laboratory animal care; occupational safety and
health; non compliance and misconduct
Lunch with Presenters
Electronic Research Information Resources
Electronic RA; Central (DRDA) assistance; UM Research
Information Website
Role of the RA
Clarifying your responsibility; Funding
DAY TWO
Proposals for Sponsored Activities
Intro to proposal development; proposal writing; pre-proposals;
starting the proposal; subcontracts, purchase orders,
consultants; costs; cost sharing
Lunch with Project Representatives
Proposals for Sponsored Activities (continued)
Internal proposal processing; Central (DRDA) responsibilities;
budgets and justifications; pulling it all together
DAY THREE
Initiation and Administration of Projects Award processing
File organization and department databases; hardship accounts;
award types; subprojects; cost-sharing
Lunch with Account Representatives
Initiation and Administration of Projects Award processing
(continued)
COPYRIGHT 2006 Society of Research Administrators,
Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.