ABSTRACT. The housing problem in Nigeria is both quantitative and
qualitative. The qualitative aspect, which has to do with the
maintenance of the existing stock, has assumed greater significance
because of the need to preserve the existing stock and bring it to
acceptable standards of living. Tenants in institutional housing are
major stakeholders who directly bear the brunt of the disrepair of the
houses. Hence they have a role to play to optimise the maintenance of
their houses within the very limited resources available to the
maintenance departments. The study was carried out to evaluate the
maintenance awareness and responsibilities of tenants and quantitatively
analyse their satisfaction with the state of maintenance of their
houses. The results showed that the tenants had a high level of
maintenance awareness and responsibility but their satisfaction with the
maintenance of their houses was just average.
KEYWORDS: Maintenance; Institutional housing; Tenant issues;
Nigeria
SANTRAUKA
KA NIGERIJOS GYVENTOJAI ZINO APIE INSTITUCIJU BUSTU PRIEZIURA, KOKS
JU ATSAKOMYBES LYGIS IR KAIP JUOS TENKINA SIE BUSTAI
Adebayo A. OLADAPO
Nigerijoje busto problema yra ir kiekybine, ir kokybine. Kokybinis
aspektas, susijes su turimu istekliu prieziura, tapo svarbesnis kilus
poreikiui issaugoti ir sutvarkyti turimus isteklius, kad jie atitiktu
priimtinus gyvenimo standartus. Instituciju bustu gyventoju yra gana
daug, jie tiesiogiai patiria nesuremontuotu bustu nepatogumu. Taigi jie
suinteresuoti prisideti prie namu prieziuros optimizavimo, nors tam
naudojami labai riboti prieziuros departamentu istekliai. Siekiant
ivertinti, ka is tiesu gyventojai zino apie prieziura ir koks ju
atsakomybes lygis, bei kiekybiskai isanalizuoti ju pasitenkinima namu
prieziuros bukle, buvo atliktas tyrimas. Rezultatai parode, kad
gyventojai yra labai atsakingi ir daug zino apie busto prieziura, bet ju
pasitenkinimas namu prieziura tera vidutinis.
1. INTRODUCTION
Housing is universally acknowledged as the second most essential
human need after food and is a major economic asset in every nation.
This fact is underscored by a statement in the foreword to Foster's
(2000) report that "Good quality housing provides the foundations
for stable communities and social inclusion". So and Leung (2004)
have also established a positive correlation between the quality of life
and the comfort, convenience and visual appeal of houses.
A United Nations report in 1976 described the problem of housing in
Africa as far from being only technical and economic, but also a problem
of social development in its widest sense, encompassing legal,
educational and community-building aspects and directed at real human
and social improvement (van Wyk and van Wyk, 2001). Indeed, van Wyk and
van Wyk (2001) made the important point that "it is apparent that
the problems of housing, urban development and economic development are
closely interrelated". They added that housing certainly has a
large potential to contribute towards providing people with 'the
opportunity to live full human lives', and hence contributes
positively towards all aspects of development--psychological, social,
economic, cultural and institutional, in the individual, community and
societal contexts.
Against this background, it is not surprising that since the
colonial era (before independence in 1960) successive governments in
Nigeria have embarked on programmes to provide housing for public
servants. These programmes recorded very little success, with some
achieving as little as 15% of their set targets. Nigeria therefore
accumulated a housing deficit estimated at five million new units by the
year 2000, the target year of the UN's "Shelter for All"
agenda. In addition, there was a backlog of maintenance required to
bring existing units to acceptable standards of living, equivalent to
the cost of three million new units (Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1991).
It is clear from the foregoing that the housing problem in Nigeria
is both quantitative and qualitative. In fact, Ozdemir (2002) regards
the quality problem as the main problem in housing and advocates that
housing policies should focus not only on the production of new housing
units but also on improving the standards of the existing stock to meet
current and changing standards. The qualitative aspect of the housing
problem is the problem of maintenance. The problem of maintenance arises
because buildings inevitably deteriorate with time due to effect of
various causes.
As stated earlier, research has established a positive correlation
between the quality of life of tenants and the comfort, convenience and
visual appeal of houses. These attributes of a house, no doubt, are a
function of its state of maintenance. This is because the essence of
maintenance, by definition, is to keep a building in a condition
appropriate to its use (El-Haram and Horner, 2002). The implication of
this reality is that tenants have a very high stake in the maintenance
of their houses, whether they are responsible for the maintenance or
not. In fact, Bitner et al. (1997) believe that in the provision of
services (like housing maintenance and repairs), the customers
(including tenants) have vital roles to play in creating service
outcomes to ultimately determine the value and level of satisfaction
they receive. It is for this reason that this study aimed at assessing
tenants' maintenance awareness and responsibility as well as their
level of satisfaction with the maintenance of their houses.
To achieve the stated aim of this study, the following research
questions were raised:
* What is tenants' level of understanding of the concept of
maintenance?
* In what ways do tenants contribute to the state of maintenance of
their houses?
* How do tenants prioritise competing maintenance demands?
* What is the tenants' level of satisfaction with the state of
maintenance of their houses?
The following hypotheses were formulated and tested to seek answers
to some of the research questions:
1. Null hypothesis ([H.sub.0]): There is no agreement among tenants
in their maintenance priority preferences.
Alternative hypothesis ([H.sub.1]): There is agreement among
tenants in their maintenance priority preferences.
2. Null hypothesis ([H.sub.0]): There is no significant difference
between the maintenance priority preferences of tenants and the
maintenance departments.
Alternative hypothesis ([H.sub.1]): There is significant difference
in the maintenance priority preferences of tenants and the maintenance
departments.
3. Null hypothesis ([H.sub.1]): There is no agreement among tenants
in their satisfaction rating of the level of maintenance of their
houses.
Alternative hypothesis ([H.sub.1]): There is agreement among
tenants in their satisfaction rating of the level of maintenance of
their houses.
4. Null hypothesis ([H.sub.0]): There is no significant correlation
between users' perception of the level of maintenance of a
particular building and the prevalent level of user satisfaction.
Alternative hypothesis ([H.sub.1]): There is significant
correlation between users' perception of the level of maintenance
of a particular building and the prevalent level of user satisfaction.
2. INSTITUTIONAL HOUSING IN NIGERIA
As a deliberate strategy, Nigeria's housing policies have over
the years encouraged employers of labour in both the public and private
sectors to provide housing for their workers. Thus in addition to
barracks accommodation for the armed forces, the police and other
paramilitary organisations, institutions like the Nigerian Railways,
educational institutions (especially the universities) and even
multinational oil companies, etc. have developed large housing estates
for their employees.
Most of Nigeria's universities operate the residential system
by which housing accommodation is provided for both students and staff
on campus. Over the years these institutions have developed large
housing estates, which are among the largest estates in the country in
terms of land areas and number of units. Unlike most others (in both the
public and private sectors), the university housing estates have
well-organised technical departments responsible for the maintenance of
the houses. For this reason and the fact that the university housing
maintenance organisations are more accessible to researchers than most
others, three large university housing estates having a total of 1357
units were selected for this study.
3. TENANTS' ROLES AND SATISFACTION IN HOUSING MAINTENANCE
Building users generate maintenance in two major ways. First, their
normal use of buildings results in natural wear and tear as envisaged in
the building design and specification. Second, their abuse of buildings,
especially through vandalism, results in wilful damage to a building.
Another way is perhaps what Olubodun (1996) called passive vandalism,
which is wilful neglect of affordable maintenance responsibility by a
user. This no doubt leads to further deterioration of the building
condition and generates more maintenance. In their study of local
authority housing in Scotland, El-Haram and Horner (2002) identified
tenant factors like high expectation of tenants, improper use of the
property and delay in reporting failures as very significant
contributors to housing maintenance costs.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.