(18.) News Release, Office of the United States Attorney, Southern
District of California, supra note 6.
(19.) Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. [section]
78c(a)(8) (2000) (defining issuer as "any person who issues or
proposes to issue any security ..."). (20.) 15 U.S.C. [section]
78m(b)(2)(a)-(b) (2000 & Supp. III 2003).
(21.) SEC v. Monsanto Co., Litigation Release No. 19,023,
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2159, 84 SEC Docket
2284, 2284-85 (Jan. 6, 2005).
(22.) See 15 U.S.C. [section] 78dd-1(b) (2000) (enumerating an
exception to the bribery prohibition, a facilitation payment, that is
not an exception to the accurate books and records requirement).
(23.) Id.
(24.) Complaint, supra note 3, at 1, 3, 21.
(25.) Giovanna M. Cinelli & Jeremy K. Huffman, Pay Me Now ...
Or Pay Me More Later: The High Price For Inadequate Export Control Due
Diligence During Mergers, Acquisitions or Divestitures, 1504 PRAC. L.
INST./CORP. 579, 606 (2005).
(26.) Christopher F. Corr, The Wall Still Stands/Complying with
Export Controls on Technology Transfers in the Post-Cold War, Post 9/11
Era, 25 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 441,460-62 (2003) (explaining the export
control law enforcement responsibilities of the BIS and OFAC).
(27.) Id. at 460-61.
(28.) See BUREAU OF INDUS. AND SEC., U.S. DEP'T OF COMMERCE,
ANNUAL REPORT, FISCAL YEAR 2005, at 10 (2005), available at
http://www.bis.doc.gov/News/2006/annual
Report/BIS_annualReportComplete05.pdf (totaling the criminal penalties
at $14.5 million and the administrative penalties at $6.8 million for
Fiscal Year 2005).
(29.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 730.3 (2006).
(30.) See 15 C.F.R. [section] 774.1 (2006).
(31.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 734.2(b)(1) (2006).
(32.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 734.3(a)(1)-(3) (2006).
(33.) See 15 C.F.R. [section] 734.2(b)(1); United States Department
of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Introduction to Commerce
Department Export Controls, What is an Export Control?,
http://www.bis.doc.gov/licensing/exportingbasics.htm (last visited Feb.
3, 2007).
(34.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 736.2(a)(1)-(5) (2006).
(35.) 15 C.F.R. [subsection] 772, 734.2(a)-(b), 734.3.
(36.) Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. [section] 2780(d) (2000
& Supp. III 2003).
(37.) Export Administration Act, 50 U.S.C.A. app. [section] 2401
(West 1991 & Supp. 2006).
(38.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 744.1(c) (2006).
(39.) See generally Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S.
Dep't of the Treasury, Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked
Persons (Jan. 26, 2007), http://www.ustreas.
gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/sdrdt11sdn.pdf.
(40.) See generally Bureau of Industry And Security, U.S.
Dep't of Commerce, The Denied Persons List (Jan. 31, 2007),
http://www.bis.doc.gov/dpl/thedeniallist.asp (reporting the unofficial
list). Official designations to the Denied Persons List are reported
periodically in the Federal Register. See, e.g., Action Affecting Export
Privileges, Mohammed Arastafar; Order Relating to Mohammed Arastafar, 70
Fed. Reg. 37,748 (June 30, 2005).
(41.) Donald Alford Weadon, Jr. & Carol A. Kalinoski, U.S.
Blunders on with China Military-Export Rule, ASIA TIMES ONLINE, Sept.
22, 2006, at http://www.atimes.com/ atimes/China_Business/HI22Cb01.html.
(42.) See generally Iranian Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R.
[section] 535.201-.222 (2006); Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31
C.F.R. [section]515.201-.208 (2006) (U.S. trade sanctions against Cuba
are broader in scope than most trade sanctions, and they also apply to
entities that are owned or controlled by U.S. persons, such as the
foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies).
(43.) 22 U.S.C. [section] 2780(b)(1) (2000).
(44.) 22 U.S.C. [section] 2780(k)(1)(3) (2000).
(45.) See International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C.
[subsection] 1701-1706 (2000 & Supp. III 2003).
(46.) Id. [section] 1702(a)-(b).
(47.) 22 U.S.C. [section] 1350 (2000).
(48.) See, e.g., Sanchez-Espinoza v. Reagan, 770 F.2d 202, 206-07
(D.C. Cir. 1985).
(49.) Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 393 F. Supp. 2d 20, 26 (D.D.C.
2005); see Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 27 (1980).
(50.) Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 1306 (C.D. Cal.
2000), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir.
2002) (citing Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert, 49 F.3d 1442,
1447 (10th Cir. 1995) and Collins v. Womancare, 878 F.2d 1145, 1154 (9th
Cir. 1989)).
(51.) Exxon Mobil Corp., 393 F. Supp. 2d at 27.
(52.) Unocal Corp., 110 F. Supp. 2d at 1307 (citing King v.
Massarweh, 782 F.2d 825, 829 (9th Cir. 1986) and Arnold v. IBM, 637 F.2d
1350, 1356 (9th Cir. 1981)).
(53.) Arnold, 637 F.2d at 1356.
(54.) King, 782 F.2d at 829.
(55.) Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 762 (2004) (Breyer,
J., concurring) (citing Restatement [section] 404 and cmt a; Int'l
Law Assoc., Final Report on the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction in
Respect of Gross Human Rights Offenses 2 (2000)).
(56.) Id. at 712-34.
(57.) Id. at 725.
(58.) Id.
(59.) Id. at 734-35.
(60.) Id. at 745.
(61.) Sosa, 542 U.S. at 762 (Breyer, J., concurring).
(62.) Id. at 725.
(63.) Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 393 F. Supp. 2d 20, 24 (D.D.C.
2005) (holding defendants cannot be liable on an aiding and abetting
theory where adjudicating plaintiffs' claims would impermissibly
interfere with Indonesia's sovereignty and U.S. foreign policy).
(64.) Transparency International, Transparency International
Corruption Perceptions Index 2006,
http://www.transparency.org/news_roond/in_focuslcpi_2006/ cpi_table.
(65.) Id.
(66.) U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security, Compliance and
Enforcement, Export Compliance and Enforcement, Export Management
Systems, http://www.bis.doc.gov/
ComplianceAndEnforcement/ExportManagementSystems.htm (last visited Feb.
3, 2007).
(67.) Commerce Control List Overview and the Country Chart, 15
C.F.R. [section] 738 (2006).
(68.) 15 C.F.R. [section] 738, Supp. 1 (2006).
(69.) Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, supra
note 39.
(70.) See, e.g., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2005 COUNTRY
REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES (Mar. 2006), available at
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/ rls/hrrpt/2005 (last visited Feb. 3, 2007).
(71.) See Transparency International, Annual Report 2005 (2005),
available at http://www.transparency.org/content/
download/8101/51449/ffle/TIAR2005.pdf(last visited Feb. 3, 2007).
(72.) 110 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 1299-1301 (C.D. Cal. 2000), aff'd
in part, rev'd in part, 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002).
Martin J. Weinstein is a partner in the Litigation Department of
Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and leads the Compliance Enforcement
Practice Group. Formerly an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Fraud Section
of the Northern District of Georgia, Mr. Weinstein received the John
Marshall Award for legal achievement in trial and litigation in 1995 in
connection with the prosecution of Lockheed under the FCPA. Mr.
Weinstein received a J.D. from the University of Virginia Law School in
1984 and a B.A. from Dartmouth in 1981.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Houston Journal of International
Law Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.