Writing the rules: the need for standardized
regulation of Islamic finance.
by Modi, Vikram
Islamic finance has been one of the fastest-growing areas of the
global financial services industry over the last decade. This growth,
estimated at 15 percent annually over the last three years, has been
primarily driven by vast inflows of petrodollars, the search by Western
banks for high-margin businesses, and widespread innovation in Islamic
financial engineering. However, Islamic financial institutions have not
achieved the same degree of success in creating regulatory environments
conducive to greater innovation and development of Islamic capital
markets. Standardized regulation is critical to the future growth of
Islamic finance.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The State of Islamic Finance
Interest is at the foundation of conventional financial systems.
Payments on interest compensate creditors for both the time value of
money and default risk. However, interest is prohibited under
Shari'ah, or Islamic law: the Qu'ran states, "And that
which you give in gift, in order that it may increase from other
people's property, has no increase with Allah." It also
declares, "We have prepared for those among men who reject faith a
grievous punishment."
For a devout Muslim, all fixed income instruments from mortgages to
interest rate swaps are clearly haram, or forbidden. Additionally,
Shari'ah bans excessive gharar, or risk. This condition is more
ambiguous than the prohibition of riba. For example, an exporter could
use currency options to hedge foreign exchange risk, while a speculator
could use the same options to make bets on exchange rates. In the former
situation, options are used to decrease risk, while in the latter,
options are used to increase risk. Even in this simple example,
Shari'ah scholars could (and do) have differing opinions. Clearly,
the absence of standardized regulation can lead to significant confusion
among investors.
Despite the bans on riba and gharar, Islamic banks have developed
Shari'ah-compliant financial products from loans and insurance to
equity funds and exotic derivatives. These financial products often take
the form of profit-sharing agreements between a "debtor" and a
"creditor." For example, in mudarabah, sometimes called
participation financing, an entrepreneur asks a bank to provide capital;
profits are shared between the entrepreneur and the bank according to an
agreed ratio. Profit sharing continues until the "loan" has
been repaid.
On the other hand, in murabahah, a bank can purchase a good for a
customer and sell that good to the customer at an above-market price
that is equivalent to the market price plus the amount the bank would
have earned from interest. The customer then pays the bank in
installments, just as if he or she had taken a conventional loan.
However, the bank cannot charge the customer extra money for late
payments, so instead the bank has custody of the good until full payment
has been received.
Each financial product must be approved by Shari'ah advisory
committees or consultants. Because it is nearly impossible for any
product to be approved by every Shari'ah scholar in Islamic
finance, banks traditionally focus on some target group or appeal to as
many people as possible. Some Islamic scholars have remained opposed to
Islamic finance, maintaining that the industry's techniques are
simply legal fudges. They draw comparisons to contractum trinius, a
method European bankers used during the Middle Ages to circumvent the
prohibition of usury. A banker would invest the amount of money required
by a borrower and then purchase insurance for the investment from the
borrower. Finally, the lender would sell the borrower the right to any
profit made on some percentage of the investment. The three contracts
used in contractum trinius, investment, insurance, and sale of profit,
were individually permitted; put together, they behaved like an
interest-bearing loan.
Growth
Islamic finance is one of the most rapidly growing areas of
international finance today. Islamic banks currently manage between
US$200 and $300 billion, an amount that has been increasing between 12
and 15 percent each year. With over a billion adherents worldwide, Islam
is the world's fastest growing major religion, potentially making
Islamic-finance an even more lucrative market. Mukesh P. Shah, CEO of
Cube Graphics LLC, notes two major reasons for the increasing popularity
of Islamic finance: "The growth of Islamic finance is linked to the
surge in petrodollars and the related opportunity for financial
institutions to create Islamic financial products."
Western banks have already taken notice. In the United Kingdom, for
example, both HSBC and Lloyds TSB began to offer Islamic mortgages in
2005. Muslims make up 3 percent of the British population, but in some
cities, such as Leicester, they make up as much as 20 percent. However,
according to Shah, Islamic finance still remains a niche market. Part of
the reason for this lies in the lack of standard regulation,
particularly across borders.
The Need for Regulation: Current Approaches
Despite the overall bright picture of Islamic finance today,
significant questions remain. The most pressing issue is the need for
standardized regulation and greater integration between the fragmented
areas of Islamic banking. One of the main concerns is that regulators
often know less than the Islamic banks do about the Islamic financial
products they are supposed to supervise, as the Chicago Federal Reserve
noted in a report in 2005. William Rutledge, executive vice president of
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, told the Arab Bankers Association
of North America that regulators were participating in more Islamic
finance seminars in order to learn about the risks associated with
Islamic financial products. There has indeed already been an explosion
in Islamic finance education. The Harvard Islamic Finance Information
Project (HIFIP), for example, hosted a seminar for the Treasury
Department in Washington, DC in April 2002.
The other issue is the lack of coordination between regulators.
While the creation of the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in
November 2002 is a step in the right direction, it is just one step.
Promisingly, the IFSB was underwritten by the Islamic Development Bank
and the International Monetary Fund. The participation of established
transnational financial institutions clearly demonstrates both
recognition of and support for the creation of regulatory bodies.
Recognizing Unique Concerns
The United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has
taken the lead in opening up dialogue with Islamic banks. Not only has
the FSA participated in several seminars on Islamic finance, but the
agency has also sought to integrate Islamic financial institutions into
its regulatory framework. Islamic banks are still held to the same
standards as conventional ones. However, recognizing the unique nature
of Islamic financial transactions, the FSA has tailored its regulations
to meet the new market. Specifically, the profit and risk-sharing nature
of financial transactions means that creditors often take on risks
traditionally associated with equity rather than debt. Similarly,
depositors' accounts take on some characteristics associated with
equity stakes. Indeed, this has led some to reconsider whether Islamic
banks are actually banks in the first place. Therefore, the FSA has said
that capital requirements for Islamic banks may be lower.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The FSA has already modified laws to accommodate Islamic financial
products. For example, murabahah mortgages used to be subject to double
taxation: the bank would pay a stamp duty when it bought the house, and
the borrower would pay a stamp duty when he or she bought the house from
the bank. The FSA eliminated this double taxation in 2003, leading to a
rise in the number of murabahah mortgages. The FSA's willingness to
learn more about Islamic financial products bodes well for the industry.
Additionally, the agency has adopted a flexible stance toward the
regulation of Islamic financial products, which is critical to
innovation and growth.
The FSA's approach highlights one major concern regulators
face in their consideration of Islamic financial products: should
regulators generally apply rules on conventional products to the
corresponding Islamic ones? As the FSA's example shows, regulators
have tended to keep a level playing field while being sympathetic to the
particular concerns of Islamic banks. Bahrain, for instance, has issued
guidelines for Issuing, Offering, and Listing of Debt Securities that
outline clear requirements for different classes of debt securities,
including Islamic bonds. Malaysia has added special requirements for
Islamic bonds in its Guidelines on the Offering of Private Debt
Securities. Requirements range from more detailed or more frequent
disclosures to requiring banking professionals to have adequate
knowledge of the Shari'ah. These requirements encourage more
transparency, which will lead to greater acceptance of Islamic financial
products by investors, particularly in the West.
More Transparency
Part of the development of a regulatory framework includes an
increase in information availability. For example, the FSA has noted
that depositors in Islamic banks must be aware that their capital is at
risk even if the bank does not fail because profit and risk-sharing
agreements can suffer losses. In any instance, full disclosure of the
risks associated with Islamic financial products is key, as is the case
with any other financial products.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Harvard International Relations
Council, Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.