Prior to its entry into the European Union in January 2007, Romania
selectively reformed its political and economic institutions and
policies in order to meet EU standards and regulations. While
agricultural and foreign policies were altered with much publicity,
substandard social conditions in need of change, including childcare,
human trafficking, prison overcrowding, and conditions in psychiatric
institutions, were merely discussed. In particular, Romania has taken
inadequate and inefficient steps to protect its orphaned and disabled
children. These less publicized social concerns, however, were not
considered sound grounds for postponing membership, and Romania was duly
welcomed into the European club. By doing so, great damage has been done
not only to the lives of Romania's children but also to the mission
of the European Union.
Articles 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union establish the inherent rights of the child and disabled
persons, respectively. Moreover, the European Union enthusiastically
adopted the new UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
deeming it a positive step in the establishment of human dignity. Hence,
orphaned and disabled children are protected on a transnational scale
under these two agreements. The reality, however, for these children is
dire.
While a growing number of orphaned children are protected by Law
272--written in conjunction with the European Union to correct the
government's poor treatment of orphaned children in government
institutions--orphaned and disabled children were excluded. To be
precise, the government ordered that children under the age of two could
not live in a government-run orphan institution, in the hope of building
relations between orphaned children and biological or foster relatives.
Nonetheless, Law 272 also includes a particular loophole that permits
all orphaned children under the age of two with "severe"
disabilities to be sent to these institutions. Though Romania also
concedes that around 700 infants have never left the maternity ward of
hospitals, it denies the existence of infants in Romanian institutions.
Such institutions, though newer, are not proper homes for children and
further the development of disabilities. UNICEF estimates that there are
about 200 of these smaller institutions in Romania; child protection
authorities admit that there are over 30,000 children, many disabled,
still living there.
It was only a matter of time before the appalling conditions of
these institutions were uncovered. Mental Disability Rights
International, an organization dedicated to the investigation and
documentation of human rights abuses, recently headed an 18-month fact
finding investigation into the situation in these remaining
institutions. They found that both healthy and disabled children were
housed in adult institutions and were subject to extreme hunger and
restraints. Teenagers were so emaciated and shrunken that they resembled
children of ages three and four. Due to the lack of staff, infants were
tied to their cribs, some never allowed to leave. Sanitation was also a
major problem; lice and contagious diseases were pervasive, serving to
only exacerbate the physical and mental disabilities of the children.
Their chances of leaving institutions are slim; nurses reported that
while children with mild disabilities could be adopted, they often lack
identification papers, live without a legal identity, and are thereby
confined to these institutions.
Even if children with disabilities are given permission to leave,
their future prospects are bleak. Only 28 percent of the 52,000 Romanian
children with disabilities obtain some education. Social stigma and
discrimination also prevent disabled workers from obtaining jobs even
though the Romanian legislature has implemented a quota to ensure that
large employers reserve four percent of their workforce for disabled
workers. Minimum wage and disability benefits are low, dissuading
disabled workers from seeking employment where they know they will be
subject to ridicule. Since the orphanages are the origins of this
negative phenomenon, Romania should place heavy emphasis on improving
the management and conditions of these institutions.
As a signer of the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with
Disabilities, the European Union should expect its members to adhere to
the tenets it establishes. The Romanian government, however, has yet to
improve the treatment of its children and ensure that infants are
registered, as required by Article 7 of the Convention on the Rights of
the Child. Having attained EU membership, Romania now has less incentive
to improve the conditions for these children, but has instead turned a
blind eye. By accepting Romania into the union without waiting for
visible and undeniable reform of such inhumane practices, the European
Union has weakened the authority of its Charter and undermined its
objective and credibility.
Should this set a precedent for future entrants into the European
Union, the strength of the values and basic human rights standards of a
common Europe will be severely weakened and discredited. The future of
children in Romania and in the rest of Europe must not be jeopardized by
inattention.
associate editor
JESSICA CAPLIN
COPYRIGHT 2007 Harvard International Relations
Council, Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.