David Swartz was more than a little concerned a few years ago when
he heard of the California Board of Accountancy's plans to apply
the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to private companies in
California. "It would have knocked the economic wind out of this
state. You can see what it's doing to public companies today;
imagine doing that to private companies. Many things they proposed would
have been very damaging and would have made it more difficult for
California companies to compete nationally."
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
So, as a concerned CPA, Swartz attended a CBA meeting to speak his
mind. He didn't expect that his decision to attend would put him on
the path to becoming the first licensed CPA to be president of the CBA
in almost four years--and put him in control of the state regulatory
body's agenda.
THE MAN
Swartz, managing partner of Good Swartz Brown & Berns LLP in
Los Angeles since 1993, speaks with confidence about the profession, and
is proud of the 30-year-old firm he joined in 1990 and has helped build
into one of the state's largest CPA firms.
Swartz attended Los Angeles public schools and went to college at
Cal State Northridge before starting his career at BDO Seidman. He
became a partner in 1976 and managing partner of the Southern California
region in 1978 when he was just 34.
"I was there for 20 years, served on their national board,
opened the Orange County office and then I left to go work for
Westfield, a major shopping center developer," he recalls.
He was Westfield's CFO for a year before deciding it
wasn't the right thing for him. "I started from scratch at my
current firm," he says. "I had no clients and a non-compete
with Seidman. That was in 1990. I built a practice and in 1993 took over
as managing partner--and the rest is history."
ENTER THE CBA
The CBA must have been taken with what Swartz had to say about the
cascading effect of SOX on private companies because it placed him on a
special task force to deal with the issue after his appearance at that
meeting. "Our task force agreed to recommend the board not apply
SOX to private companies, for a variety of reasons," he says.
The CBA approved the recommendation.
After that meeting, Swartz was encouraged by a colleague to serve
on the CBA. He was one of 150 applicants and was chosen for one of two
positions. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed him.
When Swartz first arrived on the board in November 2004, he
realized it hadn't had a CPA-licensed president for three years,
and there wasn't going to be one for a while because of the
sentiment at the time.
"I became the first licensee president in four years, and it
was something I really felt was important," he says.
"We're the only jurisdiction in 54 jurisdictions of state
boards that has more non-licensees than licensees on its board."
The CBA licenses all CPAs and firms, proposes legislation, makes
regulations, polices the profession, enforces rules and metes out
disciplinary action.
"We work closely with all of the other regulatory
bodies," says Swartz. "We're a member of NASBA (National
Association of State Boards of Accountancy) and attend their meetings.
People from our board are also regional representatives on NASBA's
board. We also interact with the AICPA and CalCPA on issues that are
facing the profession. Right now we are dealing very closely with them
on two issues which are a priority on our agenda: mobility and peer
review."
And, according to Swartz, being president grants him the
responsibility and power to do just that: set and prioritize the
CBA's agenda, something he felt he couldn't accomplish as a
board member.
"As a board member, it was really a good experience. I learned
a lot about politics, government and working with legislation,"
explains Swartz. "But board members only have limited input
regarding our agenda. They come to board meetings and act on information
that is provided, but the president really sets the agenda. That's
why I felt it was important to have a licensee president, so we could
get some of the profession's consumer-protection agenda items on
the list."
As a board member, Swartz's responsibilities included meeting
preparation, which involved studying the foot-high stack of papers he
was sent beforehand, which translated to about eight hours of work every
two months. As president he works on board matters every week.
"I'm going up to Sacramento in a couple weeks to testify
before a committee," says Swartz, whose term expires in November.
"I go to Sacramento regularly to meet with staff, and am on the
phone with our executive, Carol Sigmann, probably every week."
As CBA president, his board work grew from eight hours every two
months, to five or six hours every week. "I have to read all the
minutes, set the agendas, look at the time schedules and check out the
locations. There's a lot of administration on top of dealing with
the issues like talking to people from CalCPA and the AICPA. When issues
come up, as president, I'm the focal point."
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
TRIBULATIONS, REWARDS AND LESSONS LEARNED
Swartz says the biggest challenge about his post is working through
the system, which goes against the grain of this "bottom-line type
of person."
"I like to get things done," he says. "You find that
working with the government, there's a lot more process; it's
not like running your own business. Being chair of a board, or
president, you usually get things done a bit more quickly. It takes a
little time with this board--although I think we're moving fairly
quickly because we have some quality people on our board who really are
interested in doing the people's business. As a result, I think
we're moving quicker than we could have been, but it's still a
process."
And it's those same people that he finds to be the most
rewarding aspect of his job. "Our state employees are as good as
anyone," he says. "It's not about the profession, in my
opinion. The things we're trying to do are focused on protecting
the consumer. That's what it's all about."
The 15-member CBA is the only board of accountancy in the nation
that has a majority of public members, but Swartz says this has not yet
hindered unbiased, balanced and informed decision-making--a result of
the equal efforts of both the licensees and non-licensees.
"It assumes accountants can't be trusted, and I
vehemently disagree with that, despite Enron. It obviously would be more
helpful to have more licensees because that could provide more
background and knowledge on issues," he says.
Part of the reason he would like to see more licensees relates to
the nature with which CPAs police the profession. He believes CPAs are
actually harder on fellow CPAs when it comes to discipline.
"I think peer review is a great example of that," he
explains. "We want peer review because we want the profession to be
elevated, and we want the consumer to have more protection. Yet, there
are others out there that would argue that's not in the best
interests of the public because the system is flawed--it's a good
ol' boys network, and one hand is washing the other.
"This couldn't be further from the truth," he
asserts. "I think CPAs tend to be tougher on other CPAs because we
really respect our profession, and we want it to be held in the highest
regard."
LEAD THE WAY, MR. PRESIDENT
Swartz's agenda for his term focuses on peer review and
mobility, in that order. Next in line are audit documentation issues.
Financially, Swartz says the CBA is in good shape to tackle the issues
ahead. The challenge is finding the right people for specific jobs.
"We're not allowed to hire the people we need," says
Swartz. "We're restricted by the department of consumer
affairs. For instance, to get certain CPA enforcement people we would
have to pay more than the DCA allows. Therefore, we can never attract
the people we need. We get few qualified applicants."
Although Swartz says this problem does not effect the quality of
the work done by the CBA, it does mean the board cannot "cover all
the cases that need attention in a timely manner." The problem
could become much more serious at the end of the year when the
CBA's most senior staff retires.
Swartz and the CBA are working with the state, the DCA and other
committees to get that restriction changed and, at press time, Swartz
expected to soon hear whether the CBA can start paying more.
Still, Swartz is confident the board can move its agenda forward.
PEER REVIEWS? WHICH PATHWAY? HOW ABOUT MOBILITY?
Swartz's main concern in relation to peer review are audits
being done by inexperienced CPAs--and being conducted incorrectly.
"Peer review is a way to police those CPAs and make sure
standards are being upheld during audits," he says. "CPAs
doing audits without peer review is dangerous."
As far as mobility is concerned, Swartz points out that the issues
became even greater with the advent of the internet and online services.
Before, if somebody came to California and performed incidental
work, it was allowed. Now, with practice privilege, if somebody comes to
work with a private company, you have to get a license to practice in
the state. This also applies to licensees that don't come into the
state, but do all their work online.
COPYRIGHT 2007 California Society of Certified
Public Accountants Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.