Foreign Direct Investment. Six Country Case Studies YA Wei and VN
Balasubramanyam (eds) Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2004, 204pp.
This book contains six papers on foreign direct investment (FDI) in
Ireland, China, India, Malaysia, Mexico, and Sub-Saharan Africa,
originally presented at a conference in September 2002. The authors
examine the determinants of FDI and its impact on economic development,
employment, technology transfers, and trade. Every chapter is followed
by very challenging comments from discussants.
Frances Ruan describes the exceptionally successful experience of
Ireland. Because of data limitations, her discussion of FDI impact
centres on manufacturing sector. Can Irish industrial policies be copied
successfully elsewhere? Commentator Peter Buckley summarises key
elements behind Irish success with attracting FDI: a favourable
institutional environment, consistency of policy, openness, focus on the
regional (EU) market, and attention to comparative advantage, as
determined by MNC's, not the government.
Yingqi Annie Wei analyses FDI in China. Why is China so successful
in attracting FDI? After discussing national versus regional aspects
that affect Chinese FDI inflows, she argues for transaction costs and
domestic financing constraints as the primary explanations for high FDI
inflows. But the distribution of FDI across regions and sectors is
pretty uneven. With regard to relationship between FDI and technology
spillovers, trade, and economic growth, Wei observes that evidence is
very mixed. More rigorous empirical analyses as well as theoretical
models designed specifically for China would be useful, in addition to
using firm-level data, as suggested by a discussant, Yasheng Huang.
A second paper by V.N. Balasubramanyam and Vidya Mahambare
discusses FDI in India. Why has the liberalisation in 1991 failed to
attract more FDI? Comparing India and China, the authors provide several
reasons why Chinese success with FDI inflows might not be a proper model
for India. They argue that factor and product market distortions
generated by the overall domestic policies--for example, excessive delay
and red tape--are the major reasons for relatively low FDI inflows.
These domestic market distortions should be eliminated first, because
without major adjustments in domestic policy, opening the doors widely
to FDI will not be very successful. Discussant Sanjaya Lall, however,
warns that a desire to attract more FDI does not mean that India should
adopt completely 'distortion free' policy.
Nigel Driffield, Roger Clarke, and Abdul Halim Mohd Noor discuss
FDI in Malaysia during four industrialisation stages. They describe the
role of FDI in Malaysian electrical and electronics industry,
particularly its impact on technological development. Although Malaysia
has managed to attract huge amounts of FDI, discriminatory government
policies seem to limit spillovers to domestic firms. The authors also
discuss other possible causes of weak technology spillovers and provide
several suggestions for future policy changes. The authors and
discussant review several policy alternatives.
David Griffiths and David Sapsford focus on how Mexico's
joining NAFTA has affected FDI inflows. The authors believe that FDI has
increased employment, exports, and technology spillovers to Mexican
firms. In a very interesting discussion, they analyse the impact of FDI
on regional disparities between the northern and southern parts of
Mexico. Existing evidence showing positive FDI productivity spillovers
has used cross-sectional industry-level data; however, firm-level panel
data studies for Mexico are missing. Since panel data studies in other
developing countries often find no or negative productivity spillovers
from FDI, similar panel data analyses using Mexican data should be
conducted. While we have several analyses of various channels of FDI
spillovers, we still do not know how to increase these spillovers.
Frederic Sjoholm comments that even if FDI does not generate positive
technology spillovers, government should still try to attract FDI, since
it can benefit a host country via increased tax revenues, employment, or
exports.
Mohammad Salisu analyses determinants, efficacy, and FDI policies
in Sub-Saharan Africa, where inflows are much behind those of the other
developing countries. There is also a very little research on this
region. Moreover, data on African FDI inflows are hard to interpret,
owing to massive devaluations. So far, most African FDI is concentrated
in the mineral--and oil-based economies, though recently several other
countries--including Uganda, Mauritius, Mozambique, and Ghana--have
increased FDI inflows, primarily, thanks to their macro-economic and
political stability, trade reforms, and institutional changes. Nigeria
demonstrates some of the major impediments to attracting FDI to Africa,
especially corruption. To attract more FDI, the author concludes, Africa
needs comprehensive social reform and reduction of bureaucratism. In
this process, partnerships with international donor communities, such as
The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), might play a
crucial role.
The book is very well written and organised; it is an excellent
reference not only for researchers and policy makers, but also for those
doing business in developing countries.
Renata Kosova
The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
COPYRIGHT 2007 Association for Comparative Economic
Studies Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.