There are several limitations to this study. One of the most
notable is the small sample size which increases capitalization on
chance, and indicates results are likely not completely representative
of the population value. Further, because of the reduced power due to
the smaller sample size, impact was difficult to detect, and chances of
replicating findings are reduced. The measures of the HR safety
practices may also represent a weakness. Because of the lack of existing
measures, new items were developed for this study. CFAs indicated some
support for the scales, but fit indices indicate that training and
performance evaluation should be investigated further. Also, measures
were all collected from upper-management. Although this provided a more
accurate measure of company policies and organizational-level practices,
some information on what actually was occurring may have been lost. The
dependent variable measures were also a limitation. In order to get the
most consistent information across companies as possible, OSHA
information was used. However, this information provides only injuries
serious enough to report, resulting in the low base rate of the injury
criterion, potentially reducing the estimated correlations. Transient
error was also unable to be fully corrected for in the measures of the
independent variable. This most likely caused the correlation and
regression estimates to be conservative, reducing the probability of
detecting an impact of HR safety practices. However, despite the small
sample size and conservative estimates, this study still supports the
impact of HR safety practices on organizational injuries.
Future Research
This study just touches on the vast aspects of Human Resource
practices that may actually impact organizational safety outcomes. There
are many additional questions that arise from this research, as well as
other areas that need to be explored. When examining the selection
process, drug-testing continues to be elusive in what is being measured
and its importance to the organization. Whereas alcohol-testing can
determine the amount a person is under the influence, drug-testing is
simply an indicator of whether or not an individual has recently had
drugs in their system (Macdonald, 1995). Drug-testing may also be an
indicator of other life-style characteristics (Macdonald, 1995) that are
also predictors of job injuries. Additionally, variation on location and
type of work where selection practices may be more beneficial should be
considered. Association between selection practices and different types
of industries needs to be considered, as jobs that have high
psychological and emotional demands (Swaen et al., 2004) have been found
to have a higher risk of occupational injury. When examining prior work
experience, cognitive reasoning behind why an injury occurred could be
examined. Curry, Quinn, Atkins, and Carlson (2004) hypothesize that the
experience factor is lessened because employees' view of risk on a
job is reduced over time. Thus, the inexperienced worker may have an
injury due to lack of knowledge and information, whereas an experienced
worker may simply take additional risks. Other pre-employment tests
should also be included in future research, as Wallace and Vodanovich
(2003) found scales, such as the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
and Blunder factor, associated with workplace accidents.
When examining rewards for safety in future research, additional
individual factors should be taken into consideration. Sims (2004: 103)
discusses the "human desire to be heroic," indicating not just
rewards, but human nature itself, might impact the lack of injury
reporting. Additionally, as organizations are beginning to pilot safety
reward programs based on risk reduction (Sheehy, 2004), rather than
reduced numbers of injuries, differences in the types of safety
incentive programs and employees' reactions toward them should be
explored. Additional control variables should also be explored. Although
this study had a relatively low number of unionized companies
participate, unionization and its effect on safety has continued to be
debated (Reardon, 1996). Age also should be examined more as Salminen
(2004) found that younger workers had a higher injury rate, but a lower
fatality rate.
Conclusion
This study begins the important integration of the human resource
and safety literatures, as well as providing findings that HR practices
are associated with employee injuries. This provides organizations with
some potential steps they can take to improve employee safety. However,
this study only begins to touch on issues that may make a significant
difference in organizational safety, calling for future studies to
continue defining what and how HR practices may be associated with
reducing employee injuries.
References
Anderson, N. and C. Ostroff. 1997. "Selection as
Socialization." Chapter in International Handbook of Selection and
Assessment. Eds. N. Anderson and P. Herriot. Chichester, England: John
Wiley & Sons. pp. 413-440.
Arthur, W.J., G. V. Barrett and R. A. Alexander. 1991.
"Prediction of Vehicular Accident Involvement: A
Meta-analysis." Human Performance 4: 89-105.
Bartol, K. M. and L. L. Hagmann. 1992. "Team-based Pay Plans:
A Key to Effective Teamwork." Compensation and Benefits Review 24:
9.
--and E. A. Locke. 2000. "Incentives and Motivation."
Chapter in Compensation in Organizations: Progress and Prospects. Eds.
S. Rynes and B. Gerhart. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press. pp.
104-147.
Becker, B. and B. Gerhart. 1996. "The Impact of Human Resource
Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects."
Academy of Management Journal 39: 779-801.
Bliese, P. D. 2000. "Within-group Agreement, Non-independence,
and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis."
Chapter in Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations.
Eds. K.J. Klein and S. W. Kozlowski. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,
Inc. pp. 349-381.
Carroll, S.J. and C. E. Schneier. 1982. Performance Appraisal and
Review Systems: The Identification, Measurement, and Development of
Performance in Organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Collinson, D. L. 1999. "Surviving the Rigs: Safety and
Surveillance in North Sea Oil Installations." Organization Studies
20: 579-600.
Cooper, D. 2001. "Treating Safety as a Value."
Professional Safety 46: 17-21.
Curry, D. G., R. D. Quinn, D. R. Atkins and T. C. G. Carlson. 2004.
"Injuries and the Experienced Worker." Professional Safety 49:
30-34.
DeJoy, D. M., C. A. Searcy, L. R. Murphy and R. R. M. Gershon.
2000. "Behavior-Diagnostic Analysis of Compliance with Universal
Precautions among Nurses." Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology 5: 127-141.
Delaney, J. T. and M. A. Huselid. 1996. "The Impact of Human
Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational
Performance." Academy of Management Journal 39: 949-969.
Dougherty, T. M. 1997. "Reinforcing Safety Values in
People." Professional Safety 42: 20-26.
Fan, X., B. Thompson and L. Wang. 1999. "Effects of Sample
Size, Estimation Methods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation
Modeling Fit Indexes." Structural Equation Modeling 6: 56-83.
Gottfredson, L. S. 2004. "Intelligence: Is it the
Epidemiologists' Elusive 'Fundamental Cause' of Social
Class Inequalities in Health?" Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 86 (1): 174-199.
Guzzo, R. A. and M. W. Dickson. 1996. "Teams in Organizations:
Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness." Annual Review of
Psychology 47: 307-338.
Hale, A. R. and M. Hale. 1972. A Review of the Industrial Accident
Literature. London: HMSO.
Hansen, C. P. 1989. "A Causal Model of the Relationship among
Accidents, Biodata, Personality, and Cognitive Factors." Journal of
Applied Psychology 74: 81-90.
--. 1988. "Personality Characteristics of the Accident
Involved Employee." Journal of Business and Psychology 2: 346-365.
Harshbarger, D. and T. Rose. 1991. "New Possibilities in
Safety Performance and the Control of Workers Compensation Costs."
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1: 133-143.
Harvey, J., H. D. Bolam, D. Gregory and G. Erdos. 2001. "The
Effectiveness of Training to Change Safety Culture and Attitudes within
a Highly Regulated Environment." Personnel Review 30: 615-646.
Hoffman, D. A. and A. Stetzer. 1998. "The Role of Safety
Climate and Communication in Accident Interpretation: Implication from
Negative Events." Academy of Management Journal 41: 644-657.
--and--. 1996. "A Cross-level Investigation of Factors
Influencing Unsafe Behaviors and Accidents." Personnel Psychology
49: 307-339.
Hu, L. and P. M. Bentler. 1999. "Cutoff Criteria for Fit
Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus
New Alternatives." Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1-55.
Huselid, M. A. 1995. "The Impact of Human Resource Management
Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial
Performance." Academy of Management Journal 38: 635-672.
Ingalls, T. S. 1999. "Using Scorecards to Measure Safety
Performance." Professional Safety 44: 23-28.
Kaestner, R. and M. Grossman. 1998. "The Effect of Drug Use on
Workplace Accidents." Labour Economics 5 (3): 267-294.
Lawler, E. E., III. 1971. Pay and Organizational Effectiveness. New
York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Lehto, M. and G. Salvendy. 1995. "Warnings: A Supplement Not a
Substitute for Other Approaches to Safety." Ergonomics 38:
2155-2163.
Macdonald, S. 1997. "Work-place Alcohol and Other Drug
Testing: A Review of the Scientific Evidence." Drug and Alcohol
Review 16: 251-259.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Pittsburg State University -
Department of Economics Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.