The recent recall of nearly 22 million pounds of hamburger appears
to be impacting debate on the new farm bill, so much so that the Senate,
whenever it acts on its version of the omnibus farm bill, will likely
delete a provision in the House-passed measure that would allow
state-inspected meat to be shipped to other states.
House Ag Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) was
instrumental in including farm bill language allowing state-inspected
meat being shipped to other states. During recent remarks on the matter,
Peterson said the lack of such action was negatively impacting organic
meat producers. "I'll be damned if we're going to allow
foreign meat to come into the country and let it be shipped all
over" while state-inspected meat cannot be shipped from one state
to another, Peterson said.
Senate Ag Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), does not appear
to be a proponent of the House farm bill position on state meat
inspections. In a written response to questions about the change, Harkin
said, "It's important to help small and very small plants ship
in interstate commerce. However, simply changing the existing law is
very complex and will require careful consideration of food safety,
additional federal oversight of the state systems and will complicate
trade." In the Senate, Republican Orrin Hatch of Utah and Democrat
Herb Kohl of Wisconsin already have introduced separate bills to allow
processors to sell state-inspected meat across state lines.
Consumer advocates and a federal meat inspectors union oppose the
measure, which is now under consideration in the Senate. They say that
state inspection standards vary widely and that the federal inspection
requirement ensures food safety. "We know from direct experience
that federal and state inspection systems are not the same," said
Michael Wilson, director of legislative and political action for the
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. "We need a
grade-A inspection system. The USDA system is not perfect, but it's
the only model we have."
The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture has
long lobbied for the change; if it happens, some estimates note that as
many as 80% of the nation's 5,600 meatpackers will opt out of the
Agriculture Department inspection system.
While the Bush administration has not taken a position on
interstate shipment of state-inspected meat, USDA Acting Secretary Chuck
Conner addressed this last week. Conner said: "I will tell you the
same thing that I told the House Agriculture Committee during the [farm
bill] markup process. The administration actually does not have a
position directly on the state-inspected meat issue. Having said that
though, I told the [Agriculture] Committee that USDA and our federal
inspection team had conducted an audit of all of the state-inspected
meat facilities in terms of determining whether or not their standards
were equivalent to or greater than the federal standards, if they were
federally inspected facilities. And I believe all but one state came
back with a clean bill of health, saying that they either met federal
standards or exceeded federal standards with their own state inspected
meat facility. And so that was the feedback I gave them, and the House,
as you have already indicated, chose to adopt that provision which would
allow state-inspected facilities to ship product intrastate."
However, during House consideration of the state inspection
legislation, USDA urged the Agriculture Committee to consider the
problems states would have in tracing and recovering adulterated product
but the House bowed to lobbying efforts by state departments of
agriculture who seek to expand their powers. Some states do not have
meat inspection laws; several rely on USDA inspectors for that service.
Under the proposed House farm bill change, those states would have to
establish their own inspection programs. While other states have their
own meat inspection programs, they would have to apply federal standards
if the farm bill proposal passes.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Informa Economics,
Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.