Measuring heterogeneous preferences for cattle traits
among cattle-keeping households in East Africa.
by Ouma, Emily^Abdulai, Awudu^Drucker, Adam
Derived S.D.
Bulls Traits Coefficient
Random Parameters in Utility Function
Trypanosomosis 0.6684 *** (0.0812)
Purchase price (U.S. $) 0.2229 * (0.3073)
Traction potential 1.0789 *** (0.1243)
Fertility 0.4235 *** (0.1344)
Live-weight in kg 0.3301 *** (0.0523)
Nonrandom Parameters in Utility Function
Low watering frequency
Coat color
Constant
Log likelihood at start values
Simulated log likelihood at convergence N = 2,783
Likelihood ratio test 941.8 ([[chi square].sub.0.99] (20) = 37.6);
McFadden [R.sup.2] = 0.312; Halton draws = 100
Hausman test statistic (restricted alternative 2) = 6.010,
p-value = 0.111
Cows Traits
Random Parameters in Utility Function
Trypanosomosis 0.8006 *** (0.0934)
Purchase price (U.S. $) 0.1161 *** (0.0279)
Supplementary feeds 0.5031 *** (0.0954)
Milk yield 0.2945 *** (0.0693)
Reproduction ability 0.2173 * (0.1256)
Nonrandom Parameters in Utility Function
Low watering frequency
Coat color
Live-weight in kg
Constant
Log likelihood at start values
Simulated log likelihood at convergence N = 3,036
Likelihood ratio test 793.6 ([[chi square].sub.0.99] (20) = 37.6);
McFadden [R.sup.2] = 0.222; Halton draws = 100
Hausman test statistic (restricted alternative 2) = 8.332,
p-value = 0.039
Notes: Standard errors are in parentheses. Single (*), double
(**) and triple (***) denote significant variables at 10%, 5%, and
1% levels, respectively. Hausman's test procedure shows nonviolations
of independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) with the mixed logit
model for both bulls and cows at the 5% level.
Table 5. Implicit Price Estimates of Cattle
Traits in U.S. Dollar from Mixed Logit Models
E([[beta].sub.k]/
Trait [[beta].sub.p]) S. D.
Good traction potential (bulls) 58.4 47.4
Trypanotolerance 24.7 16.7
High fertility (bulls) 22.6 17.1
Live-weight (per 10 kg) 10.5 6.2
Reproduction potential (cows) 9.4 6.9
Milk production (cows) 8.1 5.5
Watering frequency (bulls) 6.8 0.8
Purchased feed -10.7 9.7
supplements (cows)
Table 6. Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Bull Traits from Latent
Class Model
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Utility Function
Coefficients
Trypanosomosis 0.2101 *** 0.2605 *** 1.1483 ***
(0.0743) (0.0476) (0.0687)
Purchase price -0.1089 0.0964 * 0.0952 **
(0.1116) (0.0422) (0.0434)
Watering frequency 0.1456 ** 0.1785 *** 0.0992
(0.0746) (0.0471) (0.0684)
Coat color -0.0399 0.0523 -0.0143
(0.0642) (0.0423) (0.0555)
Live(kg) 0.1040 0.2682 *** 0.1241 **
(0.0692) (0.0386) (0.0498)
Traction 1.6664 *** 0.0851 ** 0.5099 ***
(0.0823) (0.0380) (0.0626)
Fertility 0.2322 *** 0.7916 *** 0.0099
(0.0645) (0.0366) (0.0572)
Constant -2.6555 *** -1.8350 *** -1.1524 ***
(0.3512) (0.2318) (0.2498)
Class Membership
Coefficients
Constant -1.2965 4.0756 ***
(1.2525) (1.4888)
Educyrs -0.0028 -0.1307*
-0.0500 -(0.0788)
Hhage 0.0149 -0.0424*
(0.0165) (0.0236)
Agropast 3.2523 *** -3.4592 ***
(0.9236) (0.9821)
Cropliv 0.8570 -2.2791 ***
(0.9260) (0.7600)
Hhinc (U.S. $100) -0.0433 0.0437 ***
(0.0304) (0.0171)
Number of observations 1,474 770 528
Latent class probability 0.5394 *** 0.2719 *** 0.1886 ***
(0.0332) (0.0310) (0.0276)
Log likelihood -1204.281
Number of groups 253
Likelihood ratio test = 995.4
([[chi square].sub.0.99] (24) = 42.9)
Notes: Standard errors are in parentheses. Single (*), double (**),
and triple (***) denote significant variables at 10%, 5%, and 1%
levels respectively.
Table 7. Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Cow Traits from Latent
Class Model
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Utility function
coefficients
Trypanosomosis 2.1989 *** 0.9798 *** 0.3410 ***
(0.1706) (0.0912) (0.0317)
Purchase price -0.0756 *** 0.0123 0.0412 ***
(0.0293) (0.0090) (0.0067)
Milk yield 0.1944 0.2380 *** 0.4125 ***
(0.1233) (0.0736) (0.0298)
Reproduction ability 0.4960 *** 0.0732 0.4864 ***
-(0.1481) -(0.0833) -(0.0266)
Feeding requirement 0.1505 -1.3381 *** -0.3019 ***
(0.1699) (0.0976) (0.0343)
Watering frequency -0.5464 ** 0.1368 0.1372 ***
(0.2570) (0.1046) (0.0444)
Coat color -0.1121 0.0377 -0.0424
(0.1474) (0.0719) (0.0364)
Live (kg) 0.1984 0.3574 * 0.3718 ***
(0.2264) (0.2021) (0.0721)
Constant -5.1054 *** 0.8428 -2.4925 ***
(0.9945) (0.5398) (0.3028)
Class Membership
Coefficients
Constant -0.0038 -0.9184 **
(0.3216) (0.4545)
Agropast 1.2205 *** -1.9657 **
(0.3216) (1.0184)
Pastoral -2.1813 *** -0.5922
(0.6669) (0.5562)
Hhinc (US. $100) -0.0341 ** -0.0491 *
(0.0155) (0.0274)
Tsecont -0.0609 0.9857 **
(0.3468) (0.4890)
N 1,248 408 1,368
Latent class probability 0.3998 *** 0.0900 *** 0.5101 ***
(0.0318) (0.0186) (0.0328)
Log likelihood -1,362.695
Number of groups 253
Likelihood ratio test = 675.1 ([[chi square].sup.2.sub.0.99] (28) =
48.3)
Notes: Standard errors are in parentheses. Single (*), double (**),
and triple (***) denote significant variables at 10%, 5%, and 1%
levels, respectively.
Table 8. Class-Specific Implicit Prices of Cattle Traits (U.S. Dollar)
Trait Class 1 Class 2
Bulls
Trypanotolerance 22.7 (15.1) (a) 29.6 (7.6)
Good traction 159.1 (27.7) 11.1 (6.9)
High fertility 23.4 (12.1) 81.4 (5.5)
Live-weight (per 10 kg) NS 27.9 (1.3)
Watering frequency 14.3 (4.5) 18.7 (1.1)
Cows
Purchased feed supplements NS -102.8 (11.8)
High milk yield NS 20.2 (17.2)
High reproduction potential 6.8 (0.8) NS
Trait Class 3
Bulls
Trypanotolerance 115.9 (7.6)
Good traction 54.5 (6.4)
High fertility NS (b)
Live-weight (per 10 kg) 13.5 (1.0)
Watering frequency NS
Cows
Purchased feed supplements -8.4 (4.2)
High milk yield 11.1 (7.8)
High reproduction potential 13.3 (11.4)
(a) Standard deviations in parenthesis.
(b) NS: trait not statistically significant.
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Agricultural Economics
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.