--.1978. "Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in
Aggregation." Econometrica 46:883-900.
--. 1980a. "Capital and the Theory of Productivity
Measurement." American Economic Review 70:260-67.
--. 1980b. "Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of
Capital." In D. Usher, ed. The Measurement of Capital, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 433-528.
--. 1981. "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers: A
Survey." In A. Deaton, ed. Essays in the Theory and Measurement of
Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163-208.
--. 1992. "Fisher Ideal Output, Input, and Productivity
Indexes Revisited." Journal of Productivity Analysis 3:211-48.
--. 2002. "The Quadratic Approximation Lemma and
Decompositions of Superlative Indexes." Journal of Economic and
Social Measurement 28:63-88.
--. 2004a. "Index Number Theory and Measurement
Economics." mimeo (Economics 580), Department of Economics,
University of British Columbia.
--. 2004b. "Index Number Theory: Past Progress and Future
Challenges." SSHRC Conference on Price Index Concepts and
Measurement." Vancouver, Canada, June 30-July 2004.
Domberger, S. 1987. "Relative Price Variability and Inflation:
A Disaggregated Analysis." Journal of Political Economy 95:547-67.
Eisgruber, L.M., and L.S. Schuman. 1963. "The Usefulness of
Aggregate Data in the Analysis of Farm Income Variability and Resource
Allocation." Journal of Farm Economics 45:587-92.
Engle, R.F. 2002. "Dynamic Conditional Correlation--A Simple
Class of Multivariate GARCH Models." Journal of Business and
Economic Statistics 20:339-50.
--. 2004. "Risk and Volatility: Econometric Models and
Financial Practice." American Economic Review 94:405-20.
Engle, R.F., and K. Sheppard. 2001. "Theoretical and Empirical
Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH."
Department of Economics, University of San Diego.
Feller, W. 1966. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its
Applications, Vol. II. New York: John Wiley.
Fischer, S. 1981. "Relative Shocks, Relative Price
Variability, and Inflation." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
2:381-431.
Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money. London: Macmillan.
Frisch, R. 1930. "Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Regarding the Form of an Index Number Which Shall Meet Certain of
Fisher's Tests." American Statistical Association Journal
25:397-406.
--. 1936. "Annual Survey of General Economic Theory: The
Problem of Index Numbers." Econometrica 4:1-38.
Gorman, W.M. 1953. "Community Preference Fields."
Econometrica 21:63-80.
Haas, M., S. Mittnik, M.S. Paolella. 2004. "Mixed Normal
Conditional Heteroskedasticity." Journal of Financial Econometrics
2:211-50.
Hansen, B.E. 1994. "Autoregressive Conditional Density
Estimation." International Economic Review 35:705-30.
Harvey, A.C. 1976. "Estimating Regression Models with
Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity." Econometrica 44:461-65.
--. 1990. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Harvey, C.R., and A. Siddique. 1999. "Autoregressive
Conditional Skewness." Journal of Financial and Quantitive Analysis
34:465-87.
Hercowicz, Z. 1982. "Money and the Dispersion of Relative
Prices." Journal of Political Economy 89:328-56.
Hicks, J.R. 1936. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Kendall, M., and A. Stuart. 1977. The Advanced Theory of
Statistics, Vol. I. New York: Macmillan.
Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton
Mifflin.
Lewbel, A. 1996. "Aggregation without Separability: A
Generalized Composite Commodity Theorem." American Economic Review
86:524-43.
Moschini, G., and D.A. Hennessy. 2001. "Uncertainty, Risk
Aversion and Risk Management for Agricultural Producers." In B.
Gardner and G. Rausser, eds. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol. I.
Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 88-153.
Manitoba Agriculture Yearbook 2002. 2002. Manitoba Agriculture and
Food.
Parks, R.W. 1978. "Inflation and Relative Price
Variability." Journal of Political Economy 86:79-95.
Pope, R.D. 1988. "A New Parametric Test for the Structure of
Risk Preferences." Economic Letters 27:117-21.
Pope, R.D., and R.G. Chambers. 1989. "Price Aggregation When
Price-Taking Firms' Prices Vary." Review of Economic Studies
56:297-309.
Roberts, M.C. 2001. "Commodities, Options, and Volatility:
Modelling Agricultural Futures Prices." Working Paper, The Ohio
State University.
Selvanathan, E.A., and D.S. Prasada Rao. 1994. Index Numbers: A
Stochastic Approach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shumway, C.R., and G.C. Davis. 2001. "Does Consistent
Aggregation Really Matter?" Australian Journal of Agricultural and
Resource Economics 45:161-94.
Theil, H. 1967. Economics and Information Theory. Chicago: Rand
McNally.
Wang, K.L., C. Fawson, C.B. Barrett, and J.B. McDonald. 2001.
"A Flexible Parametric GARCH Model with an Application to Exchange
Rates." Journal of Applied Econometrics 16:521-36.
White, K.J. 1997. Shazam User's Reference Manual Version 8.0.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
(1) Following Knight (1921), price risk is characterized by
randomness that can be measured precisely, i.e., as probabilistic.
(2) Theil (1967, p. 155) referred to a variance of log-changes in
individual prices as a measure of dispersion of price changes about the
mean (change in the "price structure"), and others have used
this or similar measures in studies of relations between inflation and
relative price variability (Parks 1978; Fischer 1981; Hercowitz 1982;
Domberger 1987). However, this "stochastic index number"
approach (Frisch 1936; Selvanathan and Rao 1994) has not been intended
as an aggregate measure of price risk: there has been no attempt to
separate anticipated and unanticipated price changes in this measure
(although some studies do attempt by other means to separate anticipated
and unanticipated inflation). For example, standard errors of inflation
estimates permit confidence intervals for the true rate of inflation
rather than measuring unanticipated inflation or price risk (Clements
and Izan 1987). Moreover, this approach would obviously provide a poor
aggregate measure of price risk.
(3) Many indexes are discrete time approximations to a continuous
time Divisia index, including Laspeyres and Paasche indexes (Diewert
1980b, p. 444; 2004a ch. 0.5).
(4) In general (under appropriate regularity conditions), moments
of a probability distribution for p exist and uniquely determine the
distribution (the problem of moments) (Feller 1966; Kendall and Stuart
1977). Given a k parameter distribution
h(p,[[theta].sub.1],.,[[theta].sub.k]), assume existence of the first k
moment functions [m.sub.p] = [m.sub.p]([theta]) and of
[[nabla]m.sub.-1.sub.p]. Then by the implicit function theorem, d[theta]
= [[nabla]m.sub.-1.sub.p] [dm.sub.p] and [theta] = [theta]([m.sub.p]).
This implies that any change in the vector of first k moments,
[dm.sub.p], can be supported by a particular change in the vector of
parameters, d[theta]. Parameters [[theta].sub.1],.,[[theta].sub.k] can
evolve differently over time. So in general the first k moments mp can
evolve somewhat differently over time, i.e., evolution of (e.g.) the
[k.sup.th] moment is not determined by evolution of the first k - 1
moments.
(5) It is well known that Laspeyres and Paasche consumer price
indexes place lower and upper bounds on a true cost of living index
assuming homotheticity (e.g., Diewert 2004a, chapter 4), but it is
apparent that a similar result does not hold in general for aggregate
indexes of output price risk under risk aversion.
(6) In the case of nonlinear mean-variance risk preferences,
non-joint CRTS and a Translog cost function, the appropriate aggregate
output index [Y.sub.1]/[Y.sub.0] is more complex: (14) with
[[gamma].sub.it] [equivalent to] ([p.sub.it][y.sub.it] - [[alpha].sub.t]
[VR.sub.t] = [partial derivative][[alpha].sub.t]/ [partial
derivative][y.sub.i][y.sub.it]/2)[C.sub.t].
(7) In the Tornqvist case, this was accomplished by applying
Diewert's quadratic lemma to a Translog cost function. A
generalized quadratic lemma can be used to relate Fisher input price and
quantity indexes to a unit cost function c(w) =
[[summation].sub.i=1,.,m][[summation].sub.j=1,.,m]
[b.sub.ij][w.sub.i][b.sub.j]].sup.1/2] (Diewert 2002), but this lemma
does not apply to a multi-output cost function such as c(w, y) =
[[summation].sub.i=1,.,m][[summation].sub.j=1,.,m]
[b.sub.ij][w.sub.i][b.sub.j]].sup.1/2]
[[summation].sub.i=1,.,m][[summation].sub.j=1,.,m]
[a.sub.ij][y.sub.i][y.sub.j]].sup.1/2].
(8) Consistency of aggregation of price risk subindexes can be
summarized as follows. It is well known that standard Laspeyres and
Paasche subindexes for output quantity are consistent in aggregation to
an index for all outputs, but Tornqvist and Fisher subindexes for output
quantity are only approximately consistent in aggregation (Diewert
1978). This implies that price risk subindexes of the simple Laspeyres
or Paasche form (4), but not the Fisher form (5), are consistent in
aggregation to a price risk index over all commodities. Alternatively,
we construct price risk subindexes similarly to (7), which depends on
output quantity subindexes ([Y.sub.A],[Y.sub.B]). Consistent aggregation
of these price risk subindexes requires Laspeyres or Paasche, rather
than Tornqvist or Fisher, output quantity subindexes.
(9) Diebold and Nerlove (1989) present a tractable alternative to
multivariate GARCH.
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Agricultural Economics
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.