Punto Fijo began falling apart once oil rents declined in the
mid-1980s. It received its deathblow when Chavez was elected president
in late 1998. The conflict between Chavez and the oil industry was about
who controlled PDVSA. Beyond that, the specific issues that control was
being fought over in late 2002 and early 2003 had to do with
PDVSA's efficiency, internationalisation, its out-sourcing and
sub-contracting practices, OPEC membership, and special oil contracts.
Control over PDVSA had been in dispute since the company was
created in 1976. As the oil industry was nationalised, the
trans-national corporations' dependencies were turned into 14
Venezuelan companies, which corresponded with the 14 main trans-national
oil firms that did business in Venezuela. The entire management had
years earlier been Venezuelan and did not change with nationalisation.
For example, the former president of Shell Venezuela was the same as the
new president of Maraven, with the PDVSA unit which took over from Shell
Venezuela having kept the Shell culture. Critics of the nationalisation
process, such as Carlos Mendoza, said the nationalised oil industry was
nothing more than a Trojan Horse.
Venezuela's oil industry maintained a trans-national
corporatist culture throughout its existence. The ties to the former
owners of the nationalised firms were maintained through technical
assistance contracts and through commercialisation contracts, which
heavily discounted the price of oil to their former owners.
The government's lack of control over the oil industry was
institutionalised further in PDVSA's board of directors. While
normally a board of directors is supposed to represent the interests of
the owners vis-a-vis the management, in the case of PDVSA the board was
appointed from PDVSA management. This is why when Chavez appointed a
board of directors who did not come from PDVSA, the management protested
and joined the April 2002 coup attempt work stoppage against the
government. The management did the same during the nationwide strikes
from Dec. 2, 2002 to February 2003, because of which Chavez sacked
18,000 of PDVSA's staff of almost 39,000. In appointing
PDVSA's board members, Chavez was breaking a decades-old tradition
which regarded board membership as the highest promotion a PDVSA manager
could receive. Whereas before the change PDVSA was a meritocracy, now
this is different.
The first issue on the Chavez's mind with regard to reforming
PDVSA had to do with the company's efficiency. Critics of PDVSA
said the firm had become increasingly inefficient over the previous 25
years. From 1976 to 1992 the average share of PDVSA's income going
to the company's costs was about 29% and the share that went to the
government was 71%. For 1993 to 2000, that relationship was practically
reversed, with 64% kept by PDVSA and only 36% went to the government.
According to rankings of America Economia, PDVSA was the largest
Latin American company in 2000, but in terms of efficiency it ranked
among the lowest of the 50 most efficient firms, far under any of its
state-owned competitors, such as Petrobras of Brazil, Pemex of Mexico,
or Petroecuador. Other measures of profitability show similar results.
For example, in terms of the dollar income provided to the government
per barrel of oil produced, PDVSA paid only about a quarter of what
PEMEX paid out to the government in 2001.
One reason for PDVSA's drop in efficiency from the mid-1990s
had to do with its internationalisation and a change in its accounting
methods. In 1989 PDVSA adopted a worldwide combined accounting method,
so that costs and losses outside Venezuela would be balanced against the
revenues and profits within the country. Previously the accounting for
transactions within Venezuela and for those abroad was done separately.
The result of the account consolidation was a large-scale import of
costs incurred abroad. As PDVSA's tax rate in Venezuela was about
twice that in the US, for example, the firm had to transfer a much
smaller proportion of its income to the state.
Venezuela's oil industry reform under Chavez encompasses four
areas: solidification of state ownership, higher taxes and royalties on
output, subordination of the oil industry to national interests with
PDVSA controlling all JVs, and the strengthening of OPEC.
The 1999 constitution, written by Chavez aides, anchors state
ownership of the oil industry. (The government of Rafael Caldera,
Chavez's predecessor, wanted to privatise PDVSA). The new
constitution states that "for reasons of economic and political
sovereignty and of national strategy the state will maintain the
totality of the shares of PDVSA or of the entity created to manage the
oil industry". But some critics say a backdoor to privatisation
remains open because the constitution says the state shall own all
shares of PDVSA, "except those of subsidiaries, strategic
associations, businesses, and whatever other that has constituted or
constitutes PDVSA as a result of the development of its business".
So in theory, PDVSA could turn some activities into subsidiaries and
then sell them off. After the general oil industry strike, this is what
PDVSA's directors have been considering, mostly to rid itself of
unprofitable units. Related to state ownership is a provision in the
hydrocarbons law of 2001 specifying that all state activity related to
oil E&P is to be dedicated to the "public interest".
Early 2003 saw the oil market affected by a double blow. First came
Venezuela's general strike, which wiped out two months of exports
and reduced OECD stocks to a 20-year low. Then followed the US-led
invasion of Iraq, in March, which knocked out another 2m b/d of exports
through to July. Neither Venezuelan nor Iraqi output has since regained
its previous production level.
Chavez has urged his Latin American allies to develop a nuclear
energy programme, raising questions in Washington about his atomic
ambitions. A self-described socialist revolutionary fiercely opposed to
the Republican administration of George W. Bush in the US, the main oil
market for Venezuelan oil, Chavez says he wants to co-operate with
Argentina, Brazil and Iran to develop nuclear energy as part of his
drive for regional integration. But experts estimate it will take his
government at least five years of studies, training and investment to
develop a sustainable nuclear energy project in Venezuela, now the
world's No. 5 oil exporter.
Chavez in 2005 told a Brazilian newspaper: "Nuclear energy is
for peaceful purposes. We are not the ones developing atomic bombs,
it's others who do that. We are not the ones who launch atomic
bombs" - dismissing fears over his proposal. Venezuela's
support for Tehran in its clash with the US and EU over its nuclear
programme has left Washington wondering about the motives behind
Chavez's quest for atomic energy. Ties between Venezuela and the US
are tense.
Extra money could usefully be spent on improving Venezuela's
creaking infrastructure, for example. Roads are in poor shape in many
areas. In parts of Venezuela, poor maintenance has led to power cuts.
Chavez, a blunt-speaking, ex-army officer, has rattled Washington
by allying himself with Fidel Castro and promoting his Bolivarian ideas
overseas. Venezuela has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT) limiting use of nuclear material and would have to follow
safeguards from the UN watchdog, the IAEA, before any transfers of
technology.
Flush with cash from oil, Chavez promotes resource nationalism
worldwide (see OMT) and has pushed to counter US influence with energy
deals at discounted prices with Latin American countries and
strengthened ties with Iran, Russia, China and India to reduce reliance
on the US. Tehran is interested in oil and aluminum deals with Caracas,
as well as co-operation in transferring nuclear technology to Venezuela.
Chavez's announcement about acquiring nuclear technology with
help from Iran met with wary reactions from Latin American neighbours
worried about how the US might view such co-operation. Brazil and
Argentina have the most advanced nuclear programmes in South America.
But while Brazil said it was uneasy about involving Iran, Argentina
appears more willing to help Venezuela and already has experience
exporting technology.
Venezuelan officials have given mixed signals about what they want
and initially suggested they could use nuclear energy to power oil
operations. But Energy and Petroleum Minister Rafael Ramirez says the
programme is still in its infancy (see down18VenzEnBasOct31-05).
COPYRIGHT 2007 Input Solutions Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.