CCPA aims sky high on federal clean air
agenda.
Canada's Chemical Producers' Association (CCPA) has sent
a letter to federal ministers to suggest several key adjustments to the
implementation of the clean air regulatory agenda (CARA). The CCPA
believes that these suggestions will provide "fresh thinking"
to make the regulations more effective and timely in delivering the
environmental, health, and economic objectives the government has set.
In the area of greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions, the CCPA believes
the greenhouse part of the plan can work, but there are several aspects
that could be improved and that would help the government better achieve
its objectives. The CCPA's major concern is that the suite of
compliance mechanisms provided for by the government is both complex and
more limited than expected. As a result, companies are having difficulty
figuring out how they can be in compliance with the proposed
regulations. The technology fund was initially considered to be a major
safety valve if companies could not meet their GHG reductions, but the
current design has dramatically limited its potential as a compliance
mechanism, according to the association. If the fund is fixed, the CCPA
said the GHG part of CARA can work.
Other issues that require attention in the GHG reductions segment
include credit for early action. Many in the chemical industry and
several provinces (particularly Quebec and Ontario) say it is important
to improve credit for early action. Cogeneration is another key to GHG
reduction and this will be reviewed. The clean fuels standard relating
to GHG emissions for new plants must recognize multiple fuel sources and
not be based only on using natural gas. This is putting the
competitiveness of the chemical and other sectors at risk.
On the air pollutant part of CARA, the association is concerned
about the benchmarking process used to set targets. The CCPA recommends
that Ottawa consider setting health-based national ambient air quality
standards or objectives for the provinces to achieve and only regulate
federally in a "back stop" role if provinces are not doing so.
This would be somewhat similar to the U.S. approach. Until new federal
standards are developed, existing CCME ambient standards could be used
and made mandatory.
The third major suggestion is that federal provincial overlap needs
to be actively discussed. Given the speed the industry needs to move
forward on CARA, both for GHGs and air pollutants, the association says
a better bridge needs to be built between what federal and provincial
ministers are indicating to industry and what is discussed in
implementation details with officials.
The fourth major suggestion deals with the accelerated capital cost
allowance. The key to reduction of both GHGs and air pollutants is
capital investment. With high energy costs, a high dollar, and
relentless Asian competition, industry will have difficulty attracting
the needed capital to make these investments. For that reason the
accelerated capital cost allowance provisions introduced in the federal
budget were extremely important.
Canada's Chemical Producers' Association
COPYRIGHT 2007 Chemical Institute of
Canada Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.