Development of molecular marker source profiles for
emissions from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicle
fleets.
by Lough, Glynis C.^Christensen, Charles G.^Schauer, James
J.^Tortorelli, James^Mani, Erin^Lawson, Douglas R.^Clark, Nigel
N.^Gabele, Peter A.
ABSTRACT
As part of the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study, relatively large
fleets of gasoline vehicle[s.sup.53] and diesel vehicle[s.sup.34] were
tested on a chassis dynamometer to develop chemical source profiles for
source attribution of atmospheric particulate matter in
California's South Coast Air Basin. Gasoline vehicles were tested
in cold-start and warm-start conditions, and diesel vehicles were tested
through several driving cycles. Tailpipe emissions of particulate matter
were analyzed for organic tracer compounds, including hopanes, steranes,
and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Large intervehicle variation was
seen in emission rate and composition, and results were averaged to
examine the impacts of vehicle ages, weight classes, and driving cycles
on the variation. Average profiles, weighted by mass emission rate, had
much lower uncertainty than that associated with intervehicle variation.
Mass emission rates and elemental carbon/organic carbon (EC/OC) ratios
for gasoline vehicle age classes were influenced most by use of
cold-start or warm-start driving cycle (factor of 2-7). Individual
smoker vehicles had a large range of mass and EC/OC (factors of 40 and
625, respectively). Gasoline vehicle age averages, data on vehicle ages
and miles traveled in the area, and several assumptions about smoker
contributions were used to create emissions profiles representative of
on-road vehicle fleets in the Los Angeles area in 2001. In the
representative gasoline fleet profiles, variation was further reduced,
with cold-start or warm-start and the representation of smoker vehicles
making a difference of approximately a factor of two in mass emission
rate and EC/OC. Diesel vehicle profiles were created on the basis of
vehicle age, weight class, and driving cycle. Mass emission rate and
EC/OC for diesel averages were influenced by vehicle age (factor of
2-5), weight class (factor of 2-7), and driving cycle (factor of 10-20).
Absolute and relative emissions of molecular marker compounds showed
levels of variation similar to those of mass and EC/OC.
INTRODUCTION
Profiles of organic compounds in particulate matter emissions from
various sources are becoming more widely used for apportionment modeling
to investigate the sources contributing to ambient particulate matter
levels. (1) Several studies have been performed to characterize tailpipe
emissions of gasoline-powered and diesel-powered vehicles, (2-8) many
with the goal of developing representative profiles for on-road vehicle
tailpipe emissions. Most of these studies have investigated a small
number of vehicles but have seen variation in emission rate and
composition related to vehicle age, fuel type, driving cycle, engine
temperature, and engine repair. (9-12) With so many factors contributing
to differences in emissions, it is necessary to understand the
relationships between emissions of tested vehicles and the emissions of
an actual on-road fleet of vehicles in an area.
This study was conducted with a relatively large number of gasoline
and diesel vehicles, in several age groups and weight classes, to
represent average fleet emissions and to assess the uncertainty in
average vehicle emissions profiles. With emissions measurements for a
larger number of vehicles, average profiles were created that are
representative of on-road gasoline and diesel vehicle fleets in the Los
Angeles (LA) area in 2001. Although the intervehicle and intertest
variability in both the total mass emission rate of particulate matter
and the composition of particulate matter are very large, weighted
averaging of these measurements to reflect the known composition of
vehicle fleets in the area provides a sense of the actual variability in
emissions from the fleet. The uncertainty in these profiles and their
sensitivity to changes in the fleet composition were explored by varying
the composition of the constructed fleet profiles in terms of vehicle
age distribution, the fraction of the fleet that was high-emitting
smokers, vehicle weight distribution, and tested vehicle driving cycle.
The focus in these measurements was on organic compounds previously
used as tracers for vehicle exhaust in particulate matter apportionment
studies, (1) including hopanes, steranes, and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs).
METHODS
Gasoline Vehicle Testing
A total of 53 gasoline-powered spark-ignition (SI) vehicles were
recruited by the California Bureau of Automotive Repair and the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for testing. The tested
vehicles fit into several age groups (1975-1984, 1985-1994, and
1995-2001) plus five recruited high-emitting visible smokers, and one
light-duty diesel vehicle (discussed here with diesel vehicles). After
testing, two additional vehicles with emissions of elemental carbon (EC)
of more than 50 mg x [mi.sup.-1] were also classified as smokers because
their EC emission rates were higher than most tested recruited smokers,
and an order of magnitude higher than any other tested nonsmoker. The
tested gasoline and smoker vehicles and their ages are summarized in
Table 1a.
Vehicle driving simulation was conducted on a chassis dynamometer
(Clayton Model CTE-50-0). Particulate matter samples were collected for
both cold-start and warm-start engine conditions over the same driving
cycles. After an engine-off period of at least 12 hr, vehicles were
operated with the Unified Driving Cycle. (13) The cold-start samples
were taken over the first two phases of the Unified Driving Cycle, for a
total sample time of 1436 sec and an average speed of 24.6 mph. After a
600-sec engine-off period, warm-start samples were collected over
identical cycles.
Diesel Vehicle Testing
Thirty-three diesel-powered compression-ignition (CI) vehicles were
recruited by West Virginia University (WVU) and identified by model year
and weight class in testing, as summarized in Table 2a. All heavy-heavy
duty vehicles were tested at a test weight of 46,000 lb and all other
vehicles were tested with a test weight of 70% of the gross vehicle
weight rating (maximum weight the vehicle is designed to bear). The
tests were conducted on two dynamometers owned and operated by West
Virginia University. The WVU Heavy-Duty Vehicle Chassis Dynamometer,
with two rollers, was used for vehicles over 22,000 lb, and the
single-roller WVU Medium-Duty Vehicle Chassis Dynamometer was used for
smaller vehicles. The vehicles were tested with three driving cycles,
including an engine idle cycle, the city/suburban heavy vehicle route
(CSHVR) for low speeds, and the highway cycle for higher speeds.
Additionally, subsets of vehicles were operated with a cold-start CSHVR,
a CSHVR with the engine brake enabled, a CSHVR with federal fuel
(instead of California reformulated fuel), and a heavy-duty urban
dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS). (14) Two of the vehicles were
buses, and were operated on a CSHVR, a vehicle idle, and on the
Manhattan cycle, which approximates slow speeds in stop-and-go traffic.
One vehicle was a passenger car, and was operated through cold-start and
warm-start Unified Driving cycles like the gasoline-powered passenger
cars described above.
Sample Collection and Analysis
Vehicle exhaust was sampled using a dilution-sampling tunnel.
Dilution air was charcoal treated and HEPA filtered to remove gaseous
and particulate contaminants. Exhaust and dilution air were well mixed
in the tunnel. For gasoline vehicle tests, a probe downstream drew
diluted exhaust through stainless steel tubing to fine particulate
matter ([PM.sub.2.5]) cyclones and filter holders (University Research
Glassware). For diesel exhaust tests, the primary dilution tunnel was a
full-scale dilution tunnel operated with HEPA-filtered dilution air. A
sample probe drew diluted exhaust into a secondary dilution chamber, and
particulate matter samples were collected with cyclones and filter
holders attached to the secondary dilution chamber.
[PM.sub.2.5] samples were collected on pre-baked quartz fiber
filters (Pall) for organic compound speciation and EC and organic carbon
(OC), and on preweighed Teflon membrane filters (Pall) for mass
determination. EC and OC were analyzed with the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health 5040 method, chosen to be parallel to the
ACE-Asia study (15) and other recent climate change studies. Mass was
determined gravimetrically from conditioned filters with a microbalance
(Mettler-Toledo).
Organic compounds were quantified with solvent extraction and gas
chromatography (GC)-mass spectroscopy (GCMS). Details of sample
preparation (16) and GCMS analysis (17) have been described elsewhere.
Before extraction, filters were spiked with internal standards across a
range of molecular weights and volatility to enable quantification of a
wide range of compounds. Two sequential extractions were performed with
a Soxhlet apparatus (one with dichloromethane and one with methanol) and
the two extracts were combined. Extracts were rotary evaporated to
approximately 10 mL and further evaporated with nitrogen down to 0.25
mL. The GC column was 30 m long with a diameter of 0.25 mm and a film
thickness of 0.25 mm. The injector and GCMS interface temperatures were
held at 300 [degrees]C. The initial oven temperature was held at 65
[degrees]C for 10 min, then ramped at 10 [degrees]C per minute to 300
[degrees]C and held for 26.5 min. The carrier gas was helium, flowing at
1 mL x [min.sup.-1].
COPYRIGHT 2007 Air and Waste Management
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.