Let us assume that an investor wants to replicate this call option,
but over 10,000 shares. The call option has an initial value of $36,393
and an initial delta of 56.58%. So, the investor must initially buy 5658
shares, at a total cost of $169,740. The investor pays for this purchase
with $36,393, borrowing the balance of $133,347.
Hasen's example has the stock at $35.08 six months later. To
demonstrate how the synthetic option should work, I generated a series
of random walks that the stock could take, and captured the first that
ended at $35.08. I assumed that each step was one week long. At each
step, I calculated delta and rebalanced the debt/stock mixture. New
purchases of stock are financed with new borrowing. Sales of stock
produce cash that reduces previous borrowing. The results are summarized
as follows:
Option
Beginning Value $36,393
Shares 10,000
Shares Borrowed
Week Stock Delta Bought Cost Interest
0 $30.00 0.5658 5658 133,347 0
1 30.31 0.5763 105 3183 256
2 31.50 0.6239 476 14,994 263
3 32.33 0.6550 311 10,055 292
4 34.16 0.7205 655 22,375 312
5 36.07 0.7798 593 21,390 356
6 36.71 0.7973 175 6424 398
7 36.56 0.7930 (43) (1572) 411
8 35.62 0.7647 (283) (10,080) 409
9 38.09 0.8328 681 25,939 390
10 39.78 0.8702 374 14,878 441
11 36.39 0.7871 (831) (30,240) 470
12 36.92 0.8025 154 5686 413
13 33.59 0.6868 (1157) (38,864) 425
14 34.21 0.7101 233 7971 351
15 35.93 0.7715 614 22,061 367
16 37.60 0.8225 510 19,176 410
17 40.38 0.8881 656 26,489 447
18 39.50 0.8712 (169) (6676) 499
19 41.04 0.9027 315 12,928 487
20 40.33 0.8909 (118) (4759) 513
21 38.74 0.8567 (342) (13,249) 505
22 37.42 0.8209 (358) (13,396) 481
23 36.94 0.8063 (146) (5393) 456
24 36.50 0.7918 (145) (5293) 446
25 34.81 0.7242 (676) (23,532) 437
26 35.08 0.7356 114 3999 392
Total 197,840 10,627
Ending True $50,268
Option
Synthetic $49,581
Option
Beginning
Cumulative
week Cost
0 133,347
1 136,786
2 152,043
3 162,390
4 185,077
5 206,823
6 213,645
7 212,483
8 202,811
9 229,141
10 244,459
11 214,689
12 220,788
13 182,349
14 190,670
15 213,098
16 232,684
17 259,621
18 253,444
19 266,859
20 262,614
21 249,870
22 236,954
23 232,016
24 227,170
25 204,075
26 208,467
Total
Ending
The ending value of the synthetic option is the value of the owned
stock (7356 shares at $35.08 per share, or $258,048) minus the
cumulative borrowing and interest ($208,467). Thus, the synthetic option
is worth $49,581, fairly close to the Black-Scholes value of $50,268.
The results would be even closer using daily, rather than weekly,
rebalancing.
The synthetic option produces interest expense of $10,627 in the
current year, and the timing of this interest is obvious from the
spreadsheet. However, there was also buying and selling of stock. The
buying has no direct tax consequences, but the selling produces taxable
gain or loss, the measurement of which is not obvious. Perhaps the most
realistic approach to measuring the gains and losses from trading would
be to assume strategic behavior by the investor. The investor would
select the particular stocks to sell so as to minimize gains and
maximize losses, subject to the wash-sale rules. Strategic trading is
allowed by Treasury regulations, (102) subject to the wash-sale rules
(discussed below).
Ultimately however I chose not to present such a simulation. One
reason is complexity. Strategic trading assumes that the taxpayer
maintains an inventory of stock, purchased on different dates, with each
having a unique adjusted basis. (103) Modeling strategic trading leads
to complex, less readable computer code. Another reason for not
presenting the model with strategic trading is the lack of symmetry
between short and long positions. If the investor is assumed to trade
strategically, then we can expect the investor to trade differently
depending on whether he is replicating for example a long call or a
short call. So, the taxable gain produced by a long call may be
different from the taxable loss produced by the short call.
The simulation I prepared uses a weighted-average-cost basis. At
any particular time, each share held by the investor has the same
adjusted basis, which equals the average cost of the prior purchases.
This approach simplifies the programming code, because only one adjusted
basis is needed at any time. Moreover, if the realization rule is taken
as a constraint, a weighted-average-cost approach is arguably the best
measure of income. (104) The stock or short sales that constitute the
synthetic are fungible. Selling one versus another does not affect the
pre-tax returns enjoyed by the taxpayer. Although there are other
plausible methods of inventory accounting for the securities, (105) only
the weighted-average-cost method is presented in this article.
The weighted-average-cost method is not allowed by current law,
although it was proposed by the Clinton administration. (106) Another
deviation from current law in this simulation is the absence of
wash-sale rules. The wash-sale rules potentially disallow a loss on the
sale of stock if either (1) the taxpayer retains other shares of the
same stock purchased thirty days before the date of sale or (2) the
taxpayer buys other shares of the same stock thirty days after the date
of sale. (107) The purpose of the wash-sale rules is to restrain
strategic trading that could realize losses and defer gains. (108) Under
the weighted-average-cost simulation however there is no possibility for
strategic behavior. The timing of trades is determined solely by
movements in delta, and the weighted-average-cost method thwarts the
taxpayer's ability to select high-basis stock to sell. In short,
using a weighted-average-cost method and eliminating the wash-sale rules
represent a simplifying compromise that reflects economic income while
retaining the realization rule.
Let us return to the prior example, recalling that the option
produced an interest expense of $10,627 in the first taxable year. Now
that we have an inventory method, we can calculate the gain or loss on
the sales that the movement in delta forces. That reckoning is as
follows:
Beginning Option $36,393
Shares 10,000
Shares Shares Realized Deferred
Week Stock Needed Bought WAC G/L G/L
0 $30.00 5658 5658 $30.00
1 30.31 5763 105 30.01
2 31.50 6239 476 30.12
3 32.33 6550 311 30.22
4 34.16 7205 655 30.58
5 36.07 7798 593 31.00
6 36.71 7973 175 31.13
7 36.56 7930 (43) 31.13 234
8 35.62 7647 (283) 31.13 1272
9 38.09 8328 681 31.69
10 39.78 8702 374 32.04
11 36.39 7871 (831) 32.04 3613
12 36.92 8025 154 32.14
13 33.59 6868 (1157) 32.14 1683
14 34.21 7101 233 32.20
15 35.93 7715 614 32.50
16 37.60 8225 510 32.82
17 40.38 8881 656 33.38
18 39.50 8712 (169) 33.38 1035
19 41.04 9027 315 33.64
20 40.33 8909 (118) 33.64 789
21 38.74 8567 (342) 33.64 1743
22 37.42 8209 (358) 33.64 1352
23 36.94 8063 (146) 33.64 481
24 36.50 7918 (145) 33.64 414
25 34.81 7242 (676) 33.64 789
26 35.08 7356 114 33.66 10,409
Total $13,406 $10,409
COPYRIGHT 2007 Virginia Tax
Review Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.