Improving access to buprenorphine: a managed care
company overcomes several obstacles to make this treatment more
available.
by Nemecek, Doug
Studies have shown that the prevalence of prescription opioid abuse
has risen dramatically in the past several years. In 2004, the number of
Americans reporting abuse of prescription medications was higher than
the combined total of those reporting abuse of cocaine, hallucinogens,
inhalants, and heroin, and direct healthcare costs for opioid abusers
are approximately eight times higher than those of nonabusers, according
to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
Congress intended to increase the number of people willing to seek
and adhere to treatment by integrating opioid treatment into the
mainstream medical setting by passing the Drug Addiction Treatment Act
of 2000. The law provides a way for physicians to integrate treatment of
opioid dependence into general outpatient medicine. Buprenorphine, an
orally administered medication marketed by Reckitt Benckiser
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., under the brand names Suboxone and Subutex, was
approved by the FDA in 2002 for opioid dependence treatment, and it can
be prescribed and monitored on an outpatient basis with the medication
taken in the privacy of a patient's home.
Yet following completion of a 2006 review, CIGNA Behavioral Health
(CBH) found very little utilization of buprenorphine for long-term
maintenance treatment, and CBH struggled with finding available
providers to manage this treatment when a member required or requested
it. Thus, CBH set out to understand the barriers and to find solutions
that would improve access to and availability of outpatient
buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence.
In 2003, CBH changed from being a traditional behavioral
utilization management company to an operational foundation grounded
with a philosophy of care advocacy. CBH's care advocacy philosophy
means it supports evidence-based treatments, as well as working to
eliminate barriers to access and improving outreach, education, and
support to help engage members in effective treatments.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Members with a diagnosis of opioid dependence have provided a great
opportunity to demonstrate this philosophy. This philosophy has helped
initiate the process of working collaboratively with
buprenorphine's manufacturer, our provider network, and our members
to improve patient satisfaction and optimize clinical outcomes. CBH
ended up becoming the first managed behavioral health organization to
provide coverage for office-based buprenorphine induction.
The Gap in Treatment
When CBH first applied the care advocacy philosophy to how we
manage opioid dependence, we revealed a gap in medical systems. When we
examined the percentage of our inpatient admissions due to a diagnosis
of nonalcohol drug dependence, the number increased from a little more
than 6% in 2004 to more than 9% in 2006. Buprenorphine provides an
opportunity to draw more opioid-dependent patients into outpatient
treatment, without the stigma of receiving treatment at an opioid
treatment program (usually a methadone clinic). So following
buprenorphine's introduction, one would expect the number of people
who require inpatient treatment for opioid dependence to decrease, as
more people could obtain appropriate, effective treatment on an
outpatient basis.
In 2006, when CBH reviewed the demographic and diagnostic data from
2002 to 2005, we found that the percentage of our membership receiving
treatment for a diagnosis of opioid dependence had remained constant.
The data also showed the percentage of members with a diagnosis of
opioid dependence requiring inpatient treatment remained constant as
well. Our care managers reported that facilities were using
buprenorphine as part of an inpatient detoxification protocol, but
rarely were these facilities and patients considering buprenorphine
maintenance treatment. When we did receive a request for outpatient
maintenance treatment, we frequently had a difficult time locating a
provider in our network who would accept the referral.
Working to Improve Access
In 2006, CBH convened a workgroup to develop a plan to increase
access to and availability of outpatient buprenorphine treatment for our
members. CBH also sought to integrate this treatment and process for
access into our clinical and operational practices.
CBH's pharmacy utilization department reviewed the number of
our members receiving buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. As
we expected, only a few outpatient prescriptions for buprenorphine were
being filled for our membership. As a first step in determining how to
improve access and availability for our members, we reached out to our
provider network to learn what the current practices were with the use
of buprenorphine.
"Comparing our contracted network of psychiatrists against the
Drug Enforcement Administration's [DEA] list of
buprenorphine-waivered physicians [i.e., those allowed to prescribe the
drug], we found that only 9% of our physician network had obtained the
waiver," says Network Development Specialist Sue Knutson. "To
develop a better understanding of this issue, we sent each of these
waivered physicians a survey to determine their current clinical
practice, their billing practice, and their interactions with managed
care organizations around buprenorphine treatment. This included
specific questions about the various phases of outpatient treatment,
including the initial assessment, induction, and maintenance visits. We
had a very enthusiastic response, with 25% of our buprenorphine-waivered
physicians returning the survey."
The survey responses were clear and consistent. Many providers
stated that they were not billing managed care companies for the
buprenorphine treatment-related office visits, but were charging
patients cash to receive care. Providers said managed care companies did
not effectively reimburse them for the amount of time necessary to
provide the treatment.
In drilling this down, we determined the biggest barrier to the
provider-managed care relationship was the reimbursement for induction
phase office visits. Unless providers had reached their 30-patient
maximum, they were very interested in providing this service for CBH
members, and were interested in being part of a specially credentialed
network to be identified for referrals. (In 2006, the Drug Addiction
Treatment Act of 2000 allowed only 30 patients to be treated per
physician; this was increased to 100 patients by Congress effective
January 1, 2007.) We determined that if we could find a system to
reimburse providers equitably for induction phase visits, then we could
establish referral patterns, allow members to utilize their substance
abuse benefits, and improve the access to and availability of
buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence among our membership.
Establishing a Reimbursement System
The biggest hurdle in creating an appropriate reimbursement system
for the induction phase office visits was that there is no specific CPT
coding to differentiate these intensive outpatient office visits from
any others. We were unable to find any work in progress with the
American Medical Association and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services to develop specific codes for induction visits. So we
determined we needed to find a "unique" code for recognizing
these induction visits.
We identified a code within the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding
System (HCPCS) National Level II codes that supported the services
provided during buprenorphine induction visits. Because this code was
not commonly used by providers, it allowed for CBH to easily provide
authorization, identify the claims, and track the specific utilization
of this service for quality improvement initiatives. We then used
information we had about the intensity of the office visits, as well as
other relative reimbursement rates for office visits associated with
substance abuse treatment, and determined an equitable reimbursement
rate for an office visit for buprenorphine induction.
With the identification of a code for buprenorphine induction, and
a fee schedule for the code, we began collaborating with our providers
to improve access to and knowledge of this treatment. CBH reapproached
the provider network of qualified physicians and invited them to
participate in our program to provide outpatient buprenorphine treatment
for opioid dependence. After a physician's DEA waiver is verified
by CBH, the HCPCS induction code is added to his/her contract, allowing
him/her to be reimbursed for treatment with buprenorphine.
While we were inviting our network providers to participate, we
also updated our claims and customer service processes to integrate this
additional service. All CBH care management and advocate staff received
additional training both on buprenorphine treatment of opioid dependence
and a new process to quickly allow increased member access to providers
offering this service. With all this in place, CBH went live with this
reimbursement on January 2, 2007.
Response
The response to adding reimbursement for the induction phase office
visits has been tremendous. Providers repeatedly informed us that this
was the first such reimbursement strategy they had seen for
buprenorphine induction, and that they were glad to see us working to
improve access to and referrals for the service. Providers have been
excited about opportunities to receive additional referrals for this
service, especially as the mandated patient limit increased this year to
100 patients per provider.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Vendome Group
LLC Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.