Dam data leakage at source: how unified encryption
management (UEM) is changing the threat landscape.
by Kilpatrick, Ian
Computer networks today have become increasingly open, with greater
reliance on IP. More and more staff are accessing a greater number of
applications and databases, while remote access has grown hugely. Staff
are accessing applications not just from within the office, but from
various locations outside the office. These teleworkers and day
extenders are significantly increasing remote access, as are mobile
workers, including those using wireless hotspots. Company networks are
also being remotely accessed by suppliers and third parties.
Our use of email has mushroomed to the point where it pretty much
inconceivable to run many businesses without it. The number and size of
attachments has also grown very significantly. This openness and our
enthusiasm for email, while it can make life easier and improves
productivity, has many disadvantages.
One of the main ones is the greater difficulty we have in
protecting the confidentiality of information. The opportunities for
unauthorised viewing of data, data theft and data leakage have increased
tremendously and organisations are now having to look urgently at
managing this problem.
What data is at risk?
The increased standardisation on IP can mean that all confidential
data which is held on a network is at risk and needs to be protected
from unauthorised access, both inside and outside an organisation.
Internally, there are risks from employees and skilled IT staff. It
may be non-malicious, with people wanting to find out other
people's salaries. Or it may be staff accessing confidential
company data, including personnel files, company plans and financial
information.
It could also be malicious, such as viewing and stealing customer
information or company confidential information (e.g. research) to pass
on to others. It may be employees who feel the need, for whatever
reason, to leak company or government information.
Employees can also inadvertently expose confidential data to the
outside world through the use of unprotected wireless, unprotected
remote access or careless laptop use. Valuable sales information, for
example, could be seen by competitors. Confidential information about
customers or the public could be leaked.
The large number of high profile cases of data leakage highlights
this problem. Interestingly as mobile and remote workers increasingly
store highly confidential personal information, such as passwords and
bank details on company equipment, they are also at significant personal
risk.
Another high risk area is the use of USBs and mobile devices such
as PDAs and Blackberrys for the storage of confidential information. The
very mobility of these devices renders them vulnerable to accidental
loss or theft. Additionally, failure to manage these devices means that
they are often the conduit for data theft and leakage from
organisations.
Data is also at risk of exposure from people outside an
organisation. Industrial espionage is well known and 'spies'
might be after valuable R & D information or other information which
will give them a competitive edge, such as contract tendering details.
Externally, companies are at risk from hackers or others who might
want to find something detrimental on an organisation which they can
publicise. Criminals, wanting to use information (particularly
financial) to carry out crimes, are also a significantly increasing
threat.
The large sums available from these types of crimes, the low risks
of detection and punishment, and the ease of carrying them out has made
this much more attractive than many other areas of crime. It will
continue to grow at an increasing pace over the next few years.
Data leakage is a very important issue, not least because companies
have a legal requirement, under The Data Protection Act, alongside other
statutory requirements, to secure information on their employees and on
their customers. Even if information held on a system has come from a
third party such as a supplier, companies are still liable to protect
that information from being seen by unauthorised people. The impact of
negligent data loss on their reputation is also now moving organisations
to focus on an area that has traditionally been ignored.
According to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Information
Security Breaches Survey 2006, only one company in seven actually
encrypts data on hard disks.
Recently, a laptop containing salary details, addresses, dates of
birth, national insurance and phone numbers of some 26,000 employees
went missing from a printing firm, which was writing to M & S
workers about pension changes. Identity theft is the possible result of
such losses. Also, at Worcestershire County Council, sensitive
information about more than 16,000 council workers was put at risk as
the result of another laptop theft.
At 28 police forces around the country, the instance of laptop
thefts increased on average by 6% in 2006, with the Metropolitan police
being the worst area for thefts with some 6576 laptops stolen. Devon and
Cornwall area had a 45% increase in laptop thefts, rising from 276 to
401; and Bedfordshire saw a 35% increase. These figures only include
those laptops stolen while being used outside the office or home and
excludes the significant numbers lost on taxis, trains, etc. (1)
You only have to use email on the Internet, and receive
'phishing' emails, to be aware of the many criminals out there
today who want to get access to your personal data so they can steal
from you. If your company is the repository for sensitive personal data,
then it is more important today than ever to protect it. If you carry
out credit card transactions and hold information on company networks,
then you have to comply with the latest PCI (Payment Card Industry) data
security standard by next year, or you may be financially penalised.
Is current protection adequate?
We have used various methods up until now to protect company data,
but they are no longer enough in themselves, because of the increased
risks we face.
Firewalls and access control are commonly used and networks may be
protected by multiple layers of firewalls. However, computers being used
by staff at home to communicate with the office and access information
may not have firewall protection. Even if they do, the user may not have
enabled the firewall or may not have updated it. And, of course, if
access control is inadequate, firewalls will not stop data being read.
Currently, access control may be a simple password, which is
generally recognised as an inadequate security mechanism, which may put
data at risk. According to the DTI Information Security Survey 2006, the
vast majority of companies still rely on weak, static passwords.
Companies may also use more sophisticated means, such as strong
two-factor authentication. This involves a password in conjunction with
another method of authentication, for logging in. The other method could
be a token, but could also include biometrics, smart cards or virtual
tokens.
Traditionally, larger companies have relied on the security of
mainframe systems to protect key data. However with this company
confidential data now routinely accessible from and downloadable onto
the network, this protection has significantly diminished.
Regularly reviewing access control lists is another key component
in data security, as is managing emails and instant messaging, because
unencrypted emails are vulnerable to interception.
These methods are all components in safeguarding data. However, the
computing scenario has now changed so much that, on their own, they are
unable to cope with the current state of threat.
One strong area of risk is allowing unauthorised (or departed)
members of staff to have unmanaged access rights to data, for which they
have no valid need. This is a major cause of data leakage. A common
failure in larger companies is to terminate the departing user's
rights at the last place he/she was located, but neglecting to terminate
access rights at previous divisions or locations.
Companies now need to review how the risks to their organisations
have changed, with regard to data confidentiality, and assess what the
current dangers are. A risk assessment can be carried out and positive
action drawn up to protect against the relevant threats
A key part of any programme will be to regularly communicate to
staff that data protection is the responsibility of everyone in an
organisation, and not just the IT team. It should also be re-iterated
that any unauthorised access to or misuse of data by staff, whether it
is non-malicious but done without authorisation, or whether it is done
with criminal intent, is not acceptable.
High risk areas
* Email
Email is a key area of risk for many organisations. The route for
email over the Internet is via servers. Sending unencrypted emails is
the equivalent of sending postcards by ordinary mail. They are easy to
intercept and read, without the sender or intended recipient being any
the wiser. There are actually companies whose business it is to use key
word searching to find (to order) information for interested businesses.
The solution is to use email encryption which enables you to secure
the communication and restrict read access to the named recipient only.
There are a number of ways of carrying out email encryption which
don't impact the business.
COPYRIGHT 2007 A.P. Publications
Ltd. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.