One issue involves the challenge of providing a direct linkage
between the aggregate IBRTP and financing and delivering some level of
efficient insurance product to protect both smallholder borrowers and
the lender from defaults. While the initial focus is on removing the big
constraints for the lender, there is some question as to whether this
alone will provide the desired level of "trickle down" benefit
to drive an active credit market (Trivelli et al. 2006). Allowing
lenders to pass on the benefits of the large indemnity payment from the
IBRTP may be the most efficient way to deal with the large transaction
costs associated with providing more complete financial services to
small households. This does not mean that the lender would be
underwriting the risks, but rather that the lender would link the
benefits of the aggregate index payments to the small loans. Given
special considerations from regulators about micro-insurance, this
arrangement could evolve into more sophisticated products that would
allow payments based on risk zones for group lending and group
indemnity.
One promising area of research is the use of more advanced
technology to make estimates of local losses, which would reduce the
transaction costs of extending insurance products at a disaggregate
level, while also controlling for moral hazard and adverse selection
problems. For example, there is ongoing work in risk-zone modeling to
develop accurate and reliable maps for the specific timing of
catastrophic flooding events (Southern Institute for Water Resources
Planning 2007). Technological innovations in satellite imagery may also
offer potential in providing rapid and reliable methods for evaluating
water inundation on small parcels. The institutional innovation
associated with index-based insurance products can be a motivation for
investing in technological advances that improve estimation of losses at
the local level.
Finally, mitigation remains a critical component when designing any
risk management strategy within a country. It is important to remember,
however, that mitigation also comes at a real economic cost, and that
overconfidence with engineering solutions can obscure serious residual
risks. For example, Vietnam has invested extensively in dyke and canal
systems to control flooding. Yet, experience and initial hydrological
modeling both indicate that these systems can be overwhelmed. In Peru,
there have been discussions about the potential for the construction of
flood control structures, but these are estimated to be enormously
expensive. The economic trade-off between engineered mitigation
solutions relative to financial solutions for extreme catastrophic risk
remains an important area of research.
References
Anderson, D.R. 1976. "All Risks Rating within a Catastrophe
Insurance System." Journal of Risk and Insurance 43:629-51.
ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2007. Developing Agricultural
Insurance in Vietnam. Phase I Final Report TA 4480 VIE prepared for the
ADB by World Perspectives, Inc. and Global-AgRisk, Inc., March.
Barnett, B.J., and O. Mahul. 2007. "Weather Index Insurance
for Agriculture and Rural Areas in Lower-Income Countries."
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(5): 1241-47.
de Janvry, A., E. Sadoulet, C. McIntosh, B. Wydick, J. Luoto, G.
Gordillo, G. Schuetz, M. Valdivia, J. Bauchet, C.E. Herrera, and R.
Kormos. 2003. "Credit Bureaus and the Rural Microfinance Sector:
Peru, Guatemala, and Bolivia: Assessing the Impact of Credit Referencing
on the Poor." Publication of the BASIS Collaborative Research
Support Program (CRSP), University of Wisconsin, Madison, December.
Dercon, S., ed. 2005. "Risk, Insurance, and Poverty: A
Review." In Insurance Against Poverty, pp. 9-37. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Dufhues, T., U. Lemke, and I. Fischer. 2005. "Constraints and
Potential of Livestock Insurance Schemes: A Case Study from
Vietnam." Discussion paper No. 05/2004, Department of Agricultural
Development Theory and Policy, and Institute of Animal Production in the
Tropics and Subtropics, Animal Husbandry and Breeding Section,
University of Hohenheim, July.
Hardaker, J.B., R.B.M. Huirne, and J.R. Anderson. 2004. Coping with
Risk in Agriculture, 2nd ed. New York: CABI Publishing.
Harwood, J., R. Heifner, K. Coble, J. Perry, and A. Somwaru. 1999.
"Managing Risk in Farming: Concepts, Research, and Analysis."
Agricultural Economics Report AER774, Market and Trade Economic Division
and Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service (ERS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture, March.
Khalil, A.E, H.H. Kwon, U. Lall, M.J. Miranda, and J.R.
Skees." EI Nino-Southern Oscillation-Based Index Insurance for
Floods: Statistical Risk Analyses and Application to Peru." Water
Resource Research 43(10), Manuscript 2006WR005281, 49 pages, October 17,
2007.
Miranda, M.J., and D. Vedenov. 2001. "Innovations in
Agricultural and Natural Insurance." American Journal of
Agricultural Economics 83:650-55.
Skees, J.R., and B.J. Barnett. 1999. "Conceptual and Practical
Considerations for Sharing Catastrophic/Systemic Risks." Review of
Agricultural Economics 21:424-41.
--.2006. "Enhancing Micro Finance Using Index-Based Risk
Transfer Products." Agricultural Finance Review 66:235-50.
Skees, J.R., and J. Hartell. 2006. "Innovations in Risk
Transfer Markets in Agriculture for Natural Hazards." Risk
Management in Agriculture for Natural Hazards. Rome: ISMEA.
Skees, J.R., J. Hartell, and J. Hao. 2006. "Weather and
Index-Based Insurance for Developing Countries: Experience and
Possibilities." In A. Sarris and D. Hallam, eds. Agricultural
Commodity Markets and Trade: New Approaches to Analyzing Market
Structure and Instability, pp. 256-81. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar
Publishing, Ltd.
Southern Institute of Water Resources Planning. 2007.
"Hydrological Risk Zone Mapping in Dong Thap Province."
Technical report TAR 38561, Prepared for Asian Development Bank Project
ADB-TA 4480 VIE, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Trivelli, C., M.R. Carter, E Galarza, A. Tarazona, and J. Yancari.
2006. "Can Insurance Unlock Agricultural Credit and Promote
Economic Growth?" BASIS Brief No. 46, Basis Collaborative Research
Support Program (CRSP), University of Wisconsin, Madison, May.
USAID. 2006a. Assessment on How Strengthening the Insurance
Industry in Developing Countries Contributes to Economic Growth. Final
report prepared by Chemonics International, Inc., and the International
Insurance Foundation, Contract No.: EEM-E-00-05-00006-00, Task Order No.
01, February.
--. 2006b. "Hedging Weather Risk for Micro-finance
Institutions in Peru." Comprehensive report prepared by
GlobalAgRisk, Inc., USAID/DAI Prime Contract LAG-I-00-98-002600 BASIS
Task Order 8, Rural Finance Market Development, November.
Varangis, P., U. Hess, and E. Bryla. 2003. "Innovative
Approaches for Managing Agricultural Risks." In N. Scott, ed.
Agribusiness and Commodity Risk: Strategies and Management, pp. 83-102.
London: Risk Books, Incisive RWG, Ltd.
Zimmerman, EJ., and M.R. Carter. 2003. "Asset Smoothing,
Consumption Smoothing, and the Reproduction in Inequality under Risk and
Subsistence Constraints." Journal of Development Economics
71:233-60.
Jerry R. Skees is the H.B. Price Professor of Risk and Policy in
the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Kentucky,
and president of GlobalAgRisk, Inc. Jason Hartell is Ph.D. Candidate in
the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Kentucky,
and Anne G. Murphy is Vice President of GlobalAgRisk, Inc.
GlobalAgRisk, Inc. has been leading work in Peru under US-AID/DAI
Prime Contract LAG-I-00-98-0026-00 BASIS Task Order 8, Rural Finance
Market Development; and in Vietnam under contract with World
Perspectives, Inc. for ADB TA-4480. The authors gratefully acknowledge
the editorial assistance of Celeste Sullivan. This article is published
under the University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Number
07-04-082.
This article was presented in a principal paper session at the AAEA
annual meeting (Portland, OR, July 2007). The articles in these sessions
are not subjected to the journal's standard refereeing process.
Table 1. Key Characteristics of the Proposed Index-Based Risk Transfer
Products in Peru and Vietnam
Peru Vietnam
Natural disaster Severe flooding Extreme and early
event during El Nino arrival of annual
event flood
Event impact on Crop destruction, Interrupts harvest of
agriculture erosion summer-autumn rice
crop
Event onset Excess rainfall Excess river flow
measurement
Index for correlated Sea surface tempe- River depth at Tan
risk transfer rature, ENSO 1 + 2 Chau Station
Index measurement January-March June 20 to July 10
period
Producer response to Loan default Loan default
disaster
Institutional res- Credit market Debt forgiveness; now
ponse (creditors) withdrawal debt restructuring
Institutional moti- Indemnify lending Prepare for
vation for catas- portfolio to enable commercialization
trophic risk a return to rural by protecting
transfer market lending portfolio
Impact of most 1998-Massive 2000--Extreme early
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Agricultural Economics
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.