New research directions in engineering
economics--modeling dependencies with copulas.
by Herath, Hemantha S.B.^Kumar, Pranesh
Understanding and quantifying dependencies among variables often
arises in stochastic capital investment and real option analysis. In
such modeling situations, Pearson product moment linear correlation is
widely used as a dependence measure. Linear correlation has several
limitations. More recently, copulas have been used in financial
economics and insurance to model dependencies. We contribute to the
engineering economy literature by introducing copulas to model dependent
risks that will enhance research and practice. We demonstrate the
usefulness of copula-based sampling in simulation of project risk and
regression analysis for forecasting. We also discuss potential copula
research in engineering economic analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Engineering economics deals with the evaluation of engineering
proposals. In the design of systems, products, and services, engineers
face two interconnected environments: the physical environment and the
economic environment (Thuesen and Fabrycky 1984). The physical
environment is to a greater extent more certain than the economic
environment, which depends on the collective behavior of individuals
(market forces). Risks and uncertainties associated with physical
designs and markets cannot be ignored but have to be evaluated.
Engineering economists have applied and/or developed tools such as
decision tree analysis (DTA), chance constrained programming, stochastic
programming, stochastic dominance, Bayesian analysis, and Monte Carlo
and simulation to deal with risks and uncertainty arising in physical
and economic environments. More recently, real option analysis (ROA)
have been added to the tool kit to value managerial flexibilities in
strategic investments (Park and Herath, 2000).
Financial engineering deals with the design and analysis of
financial instruments (contracts) for risk management in complex
markets. Financial engineering has looked at risk and uncertainty in
terms of efficient transfer and sharing of risks through hedging and
insurance products. More specifically, financial engineering deals with
decisions regarding pricing, hedging, trading, and portfolio management.
The basic set of skills required for assessing risks and uncertainties
in engineering economics and financial engineering is grounded in
probability theory, advanced statistics, data analysis, Monte Carlo and
simulation techniques, and mathematical programming. In fact, they both
share a common skill base. However, there is one fundamental difference
in the approaches to deal with risk and uncertainty. An engineering
economics approach is based on operational hedging (Birge,
2007)--construction of physical facilities (e.g., a grain silo to hedge
price risk), technical uncertainty resolution in Bayesian context,
phased investment analysis using DTA, assessment of project risks using
Monte Carlo simulation, and project comparison using the stochastic
dominance approach. Engineering economists have shown relatively less
attention to management of risks and uncertainties in engineering
projects that arise from material procurement in commodity markets and
foreign exchange via hedging and insurance strategies.
Copulas are now being used in financial economics and insurance to
model dependencies that arise in pricing financial instruments and
insurance products for hedging and managing risks and uncertainties.
Copulas have been applied to model extreme events, in value-at-risk
models, pricing derivatives (credit and spread options), and insurance
contracts. In this article, we introduce copula techniques to enhance
the research and practice of engineering economics. Correlation (linear
dependence) is found to be insufficient to describe the complete
dependence structure between random variables (Cherubini and Luciano,
2002; Frees and Valdez, 1998; Amershi et al., 2006; Armstrong et al.,
2004; Andersen and Sidenius, 2004; Klugman and Parsa, 1999; Bennett and
Kennedy, 2004; Hull and White, 2004; Clemen and Reilly, 1999). More
specifically, correlation as a dependence measure has the following
drawbacks. First, correlation is the correct dependence measure only if
the marginal and joint distributions of the random variables are normal.
(1) Empirical research in finance and insurance indicates that marginal
distributions of asset price returns, lifetimes, and financial losses
seldom fall in this class (Ross, 1999; Frees and Valdez, 1998; Amershi
et al., 2006). There is ample evidence that many financial return series
exhibit tail dependencies (heavy-tailed and skewed). Second, the widely
used Pearson product moment linear correlation ignores any nonlinear
dependencies. Third, correlation is not invariant under strictly
increasing transformation of the random variables.
Understanding and quantifying dependencies among variables is often
required in the economic analysis of engineering projects. In risk
simulation, comparison of risky projects, and real option analysis, one
has to often deal with two or more random variables interacting
simultaneously. For example, in order to develop cash flow models it is
necessary to model sums, differences, products, or quotients of random
variables. If the random variables are statistically independent, it is
easy to calculate their first and second moments (i.e., expected value
and variance). There are also known procedures to compute statistical
moments when the random variables are not statistically independent.
Often, however, more details are required. Instead of the simple
measures, mean and variance, one would like to know the exact
probability distribution for the sums, differences, products, and
quotients. In some instances, such as when marginal distributions are
normal, obtaining the joint distribution is easy. This is not the case
if the two random variables are statistically dependent and two marginal
distributions are of two different types (i.e., X is normal and Y is
uniform or continuous empirical distribution, etc.) Copulas provide an
alternate method to construct multivariate distributions being given the
marginal distributions of any type.
How has the issue of dependence among random variables been
addressed in the engineering economics literature when we need to
aggregate variables? Pearson product moment correlation (linear
correlation; i.e., r) is widely used as a dependence measure. When it is
difficult to obtain the exact distributions for linear combinations of
random variables, analysts use statistical moments (Park and
Sharp-Bette, 1990). In risk simulation, for example, often independent
random variables are used, but then the models may suffer from not
considering dependencies (Kelton et al., 2004; Kelton and Law, 2000;
Park, 1993). There are number of ways to consider dependencies in
traditional risk simulation. A multivariate distribution that captures
the dependency (using correlation) may be fitted and used for generating
random variates from the distribution. In other instances, one may be
able to specify a formula that captures the association between random
inputs either using a regression model or fitting an exact equation
(Kelton et al., 2004; Park and Sharp-Bette, 1990).
While there is hardly any research on the above issues in
engineering economic analysis, limitations of correlation as a
dependence measure and the need to combine different types of marginal
distributions affect risk simulation, comparison of risky projects, and
real options in both theory and practice. In this article, we introduce
the copula-based technique to model dependent risks in engineering
economic analysis. Since this is the first article to introduce copulas
to engineering economics, the article is written primarily as a tutorial
using a risk simulation example. Since copulas are new to the readers of
the engineering economics, we have attempted to introduce this technique
using standardized notation and a textbook-style example for intuitive
clarity. Our article makes several key contributions. First, we
introduce copulas to the engineering economic literature and demonstrate
the copula methodology in two application areas: risk simulation and
forecasting. We build upon the sampling procedures for dependent
variables by using copulas to capture nonlinear dependencies and
illustrate how copulas can be used to define regressions for
forecasting. Second, we identify and discuss potential research areas in
engineering economics where copulas can be used, opening up several new
avenues of research with implications for practice. The article is
organized as follows. The following section presents commonly used
classical dependence measures, covariance and correlation. In the next
section, we show how to construct copulas and discuss other measures of
dependence that capture nonlinearities. Then we provide a survey of some
well-known copula examples and procedures to identify the best fit
copula, followed by an illustration of copula-based simulation and
quantile regression. The article concludes by discussing potential
copula applications in engineering economic analysis.
CLASSICAL MEASURES OF DEPENDENCE
COPYRIGHT 2007 Institute of Industrial Engineers,
Inc. (IIE) Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.