Perceptions of the Ways of Mattering by people with
mental illness.
by Corbiere, Marc^Amundson, Norman E.
noncorrelated
2. Four content domains correlated .70 .73 .74 .08
3. One global dimension .71 .74 .74 .08
4. Two-factor solution isolating .89 .90 .90 .05
the respective positively and
negatively worded items
5. Adjusted two-factor solution .92 .93 .93 .04
isolating the respective
positively and negatively worded
items (without Item 22 and error
correlations between Items 15
and 19)
Note. NNFI = Nonnormed fit index; CFI = comparative fit index; IFI =
Bollen incremental fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of
approximation.
TABLE 2 Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations Between the Ways of
Mattering and the Working Alliance Inventory
Questionnaire
and Subscale M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6
Ways of Mattering
1. Positive 4.14 0.67 .91#
2. Negative 4.46 0.58 .47 .82#
Working Alliance
Inventory
3. Global 5.50 1.05 .80 .47 .92#
4. Bond 5.64 1.30 .76 .39 .92 .90#
5. Goal 5.34 1.08 .64 .44 .88 .72 .63#
6. Task 5.57 1.13 .74 .44 .93 .80 .73 .89#
Note. Global = global score. All correlation coefficients are
significant at p < .01. Boldfaced numbers on the diagonal are alpha
coefficients.
Note: The numbers indicated with # on the diagonal are alpha
coefficients.
COPYRIGHT 2007 National Career Development
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.