An analysis of housing location attributes in the inner city of budapest, Hungary, using expert judgements.

McLean, D. G. and Mundy, B. (1998) The addition of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis to the required body of knowledge for the estimation of environmental damages to real property. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 1(1), p. 1-19.

Maclennan, D. (1977) Some thoughts on the nature and purpose of house price studies. Urban Studies, 14, p. 59-71.

Molin, E., Oppewal, H. H. and Timmermans, H. (1999) Group-based versus individual-based conjoint preference models of residential preferences: a comparative test. Environment and Planning A, 31, p. 1935-1947.

Nevalainen, R., Staffans, A. and Vuorela, P. (1990) Asumisen laadun arviointi jatutkiminen (Evaluating and studying the quality of housing, in Finnish), Center for Urban and Regional Research (YTK), Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.

Ong, S. E. and Chew, T. I. (1996) Singapore residential market: an expert judgemental forecast incorporating the analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Property Valuation & Investment, 14(1), p. 50-66.

Poyhonen, M. (1998) On Attribute Weighting in Value Trees, Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.

Raslanas, S., Tupenaite, L. and Steinbergas, T. (2006) Research on the prices of flats in the South East London and Vilnius. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 10(1), p. 51-63.

Rev8 (2004) Jozsefvaros 15 eves keruletfejlesztesi strategia (15 years district development strategy, in Hungarian), September.

Rietveld, P. and Wagtendonk, A. J. (2004) The location of new residential areas and the preservation of open space: experiences in the Nether lands. Environment and Planning A, 36, p. 2047-2063.

Rothenberg, J., Galster, G., Butler, R. and Pitkin, J. (1991) The maze of urban housing markets: theory, evidence and policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Saaty, T. L. (1990) How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, p. 9-26.

Strand, J. and Vagnes, M. (2001) The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: a study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers' appraisals. Transportation, 28, p. 137-156.

Tosics, I. (2006) Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest, In Tsenkova, S. and Nedovic-Budic, Z. (eds), The Urban Mosaic of Post-So cialist Europe, Space, Institutions and Policy, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, p. 131-150.

Wang, D. and Li, S.-M. (2004) Housing preferences in a transitional housing system: the case of Beijing, China. Environment and Planning A, 36, p. 69-87.

Whitehead, C. M. E. (1999) Urban housing markets: theory and policy, in Mills, E. S. and P. Cheshire (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier Science BV. p. 1559-1594.

Willis, K. G. and Garrod, G. D. (1993) Not from experience: a comparison of experts opinions and hedonic price estimates of the incremental value of property attributable to an environmental feature. Journal of Property Research, 10, p. 193-216.

Zahedi, F. (1986) The Analytic Hierarchy Process--a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4) July-August, p. 96-108.

SANTRAUKA

EKSPERTU VERTINIMAIS PAGRISTA BUSTO APLINKOS POZYMIU ANALIZE BUDAPESTO (VENGRIJA) CENTRE

Tom KAUKO

Vykdant tyrimus svarbus uzdavinys--ivertinti aplinkos kokybes vaidmeni renkantis busta, nepamirstant su paklausa susijusiu aplinkybiu, kurias lemia ekonominiai ir socialiniai bei kulturiniai pokyciai miestu ir didmiesciu busto rinkose. Kai paklausa yra ivairi, vartojimo polinkiai suformuoja skirtingu pageidaujamu savybiu komplekta. Praktine prasme tokius rezultatus galima gauti ivertinus aplinkos pozymius pagal santykine ju svarba namo pirkejui arba nuomininkui. Pavyzdziui, sia procedura galima atlikti lyginant pozymiu poras pagal ekspertu vertinimus ir taikant analitini hierarchini procesa (AHP). Sis tyrimas pagristas ekspertu sudarytais gyvenamosios vietos kokybes aprasymais Budapesto centre ir remiasi ankstesniais busto rinkos analizes darbais. Siame darbe demesys atkreipiamas j viena problema, budinga pokomunistinems salims--siulomu produktu grupiu asortimentas neatitinka pirkejo pageidavimu. Pirkejai vis dazniau akcentuoja kokybe ir diferencijuoja savo poreikius.

Tom KAUKO

Department of Geography, Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway and OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Tel.: +47 73591919; fax: +47 73591878; E-mail: tom.kauko@svt.ntnu.no

Received 10 August 2007; accepted 12 October 2007 Table 1. Comparison of the importance: location vs. house Respondent Location House 1. 80 20 2. 40 60 3. 50 50 4. 20 80 5. 60 40 6. -- -- 7. 60 40 8. 70 30 9. 90 10 Ranges 20 ...90 10 ... 80 Median 60 40 Table 2. The respondent profiles as naturalistic generalisations Respondent Most important attribute Least important attribute 1. Accessibility (social) Municipality 2. Social Services 3. Social Municipality 4. Social Services 5. Physical Services 6. Social Accessibility 7. Municipality Services 8. Physical, social Accessibility 9. Physical Municipality