I. A SLEEPING GIANT: WHERE DID METHAMPHETAMINE
COME FROM?
A. A History of Methamphetamine
B. Methamphetamine Production
C. An International Affair
II. THE U.S. RESPONSE TO METHAMPHETAMINE ABUSE
A. State Action
B. Federal Regulation
III. THE INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO
METHAMPHETAMINE ABUSE
A. The International Struggle with
Methamphetamines: Bilateral Agreements,
Terrorism, and Corruption
B. The United Nations' Response
IV. A TWO FRONT WAR: COMPARING THE U.S. AND
INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO METHAMPHETAMINE
ABUSE
A. Weak States: the Methamphetamine Den of
Thieves
B. Confusing the War on Terrorism and the War
on Drugs
C. Controlling the Precursor Manufactures
D. United States Attempts at International
Cooperation: Intelligence, Training, and Seizures
V. CONCLUSION
Look at me, busy as a bee,
Where'd I get all this energy?
Oh meth. Mmm meth.
I don't sleep, and I don't eat,
But I've got the cleanest house on the street.
Oh meth. Mmm meth.
Get these hairs all out of my face.
Get these bugs all out of my place.
One more hit, no time to waste.
Oh meth. Mmm meth. (1)
In the late 1990s, the Office of the National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP) began running commercials warning of the dangers of
methamphetamine (2)--a drug that was quickly becoming a national
concern. (3) However, the contrast between the upbeat jingle and the
underlying antimethamphetamine message may have confused the public.
This initial foray into addressing methamphetamine abuse not only
highlighted the government's flawed grasp over the severity of the
drug, but also foreshadowed the struggle to create a cohesive national
policy to fight this growing concern.
The government continues to provide mixed messages concerning the
gravity of U.S. methamphetamine abuse:
In terms of damage to children and to our society, meth is now the
most dangerous drug in America--a problem that has surpassed
marijuana.
--Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (4)
But is [meth] the only drug problem? Is it the worst drug problem?
... The answer is no.
--John Walters, Director of the ONDCP (5)
While some policymakers argue that the media and the public are
simply "crying meth," (6) others are working to encourage all
levels of government to continue passing legislation that addresses
methamphetamine-related issues. (7)
Indeed, increased media attention has forced the state and federal
levels of government to adopt new policies addressing methamphetamines.
(8) However, the fight against methamphetamine abuse, production, and
trafficking within the United States cannot rely solely on additional
federal guidelines and experimentation in state legislatures--it
requires a clear federal response and international cooperation. Because
many countries' methamphetamine policies focus on single faceted
solutions or suffer from lack of funding and support, (9) the United
States must continue to foster support for international initiatives
designed to control global methamphetamine production and encourage U.N.
resolutions addressing methamphetamine-related issues. In addition,
reducing methamphetamine abuse and production in the United States
requires an understanding of methamphetamine's history, an effort
to balance federalism issues, and a harmonization of domestic goals that
may diametrically oppose international foreign policies.
This Comment is divided into five parts. Part I discusses domestic
methamphetamine production, traces U.S. addiction rates, and illustrates
the global nature of methamphetamine abuse. Part II of this Comment
analyzes the United States' response to the growing methamphetamine
problem at both the state and federal levels. Turning away from U.S.
methamphetamine policy, Part III examines the international responses to
methamphetamine abuse and production as well as the U.N.'s current
regulations concerning precursor chemicals--those chemicals used to
manufacture the drug. Part IV then analyzes some of the current U.S. and
international strategies, including providing aid to weaker countries,
regulating precursor chemicals, and sharing methamphetamine trafficking
intelligence. In addition, Part IV discusses some of the dangers of
including methamphetamine legislation within antiterrorism legislation.
Finally, Part V concludes by explaining why the United States and the
international community must cooperate to eliminate the production and
abuse of methamphetamines.
I. A SLEEPING GIANT: WHERE DID METHAMPHETAMINE COME FROM?
Methamphetamines are addictive stimulants that trigger the brain to
release high levels of dopamine. (10) This chemical release results in
the user feeling a sense of euphoria. (11) In addition to affecting the
central nervous system, (12) methamphetamines increase activity levels
and alter a user's appetite. (13) While other stimulants may create
a high that lasts 20-30 minutes, a methamphetamine user's high may
last 6-8 hours. (14)
A user's euphoria is "followed by depression and
exhaustion that drive the need for the[ir] next fix." (15) The
increased level of dopamine causes the body to speed up metabolic
activities, including aging, and results in the deterioration of the
user's physical appearance. (16) Additionally, repeated
methamphetamine use has been linked to "deficits in learning and
memory" resulting in longterm health dangers, including brain
damage. (17)
Within the last twenty years, methamphetamine, once labeled the
"poor man's cocaine," has become one of the most abused
drugs in America. (18) Its popularity quickly spread into the
mainstream, creating addicts in all facets of the socioeconomic spectrum
without regard to geographic areas. (19) By 2005, an estimated 12
million Americans had tried methamphetamines at least once in their
lifetimes, (20) and by 2006, an estimated 1.4 million Americans were
actively using methamphetamines. (21)
Methamphetamine production and abuse disrupts the social and
economic framework of both methamphetamine users and nonusers. (22) Some
of the impacts of methamphetamines on local communities include: an
increase in crime and jail overcrowding, (23) an increase in child
welfare cases, (24) higher levels of environmental waste, (25)
supporting terrorism, (26) and increased healthcare cost. (27) In
addition, over fifty eight percent of law enforcement agencies in forty
five states rank methamphetamines as their largest drug problem. (28)
A. A History of Methamphetamine
In 1919, Japanese chemist A. Ogata first synthesized
methamphetamine by chemically reducing ephedrine. (29)
Methamphetamine's stimulant effect quickly became a popular fatigue
cure for both the Axis and Allied troops during World War II. (30) In
the United States, methamphetamines and amphetamines gained notoriety in
the 1950s as diet aids, depression cures, and prescriptions to
"give housewives a boost." (31)
As the U.S. government strengthened drug regulation in the 1970s,
the use of amphetamines and methamphetamines diminished. (32) In 1970,
the Control Substance Act designated methamphetamine as a Schedule II
drug, which severely limited the drug's availability and legal
distribution. (33)
Following this classification, amphetamine and methamphetamine
production moved underground with biker gangs from California and the
Pacific Northwest "cooking" chemicals to produce
methamphetamine. (34) In the early 1980s, U.S. amphetamine production
diminished after the government placed restrictions on the key
ingredient phenyl-2-propanone. (35) As a result, the "cooks"
adjusted the recipe to focus on methamphetamine production. (36)
From 1993-1995, in response to rising domestic drug production
levels, the U.S. government increased the regulation of bulk sales of
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. (37) The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
also began restricting sales of "box lab" chemical kits that
"contained everything you needed to produce meth." (38)
Due to the increased domestic import restrictions, methamphetamine
producers in the United States began exploiting chemical importation
loopholes in Canada to obtain bulk amounts of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine. (39) By 2002, Canada had "become the leading
supply route for the raw ingredient[s]" needed to produce
methamphetamines. (40) Under pressure from the United States, the
Canadian government enacted new regulations in 2003 to restrict the
importation of bulk amounts of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. (41)
However, this solution to U.S. methamphetamine production proved to be
short lived since curtailing imports into Canada resulted in increased
drug trafficking from Mexico into the United States. (42) Today, Mexico
is the major source of U.S. methamphetamines with Mexican
"superlabs" (43) providing between sixty five and eighty
percent of all methamphetamines consumed in the United States. (44)
B. Methamphetamine Production
In the United States, methamphetamines generally come from one of
two different sources: small, domestic "mom and pop" labs or
superlabs run by Mexican drug cartels. (45) The small "mom and
pop" labs operate within the United States and account for twenty
percent of the methamphetamine supply, while superlabs account for the
remaining methamphetamine supply sold in the United States. (46)
COPYRIGHT 2007 Houston Journal of International
Law Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.