(75) But see Allen Kenney, Deja Vu? Bush Wants $500 Million for IRS
to Toughen Up in 2006, 106 TAX NOTES 747 (Feb. 14, 2005)
("Bush's 2005 budget proposal slashed modernization funding by
more than a fourth, down to $285 million from 2004's $390 million
allocation. Congress was even less kind, decreasing modernization
funding nearly 50%, from $388 million for 2004 to $203 million for this
year.").
(76) See generally Dan Mitchell, Tax Reform: The Key to Preserving
Privacy and Competition in a Global Economy 9 (Inst. for Policy
Innovation, IPI Policy Report No. 171, 2002) ("Fundamental tax
reform is the solution to an invasive tax code that gives government the
right to know every detail about a taxpayer's financial
existence.").
(77) See, e.g., Stephen Moore, The Economic & Civil Liberties
Case for a National Sales Tax, 71 TAX NOTES 101, 103-04 (1996) (arguing
that a retail sales tax, and not a flat tax, would cause our tax system
to be less intrusive as the Service has the right to search the property
and financial documents of American citizens without a search warrant).
(78) See, e.g., PRIVACY PROTECTION STUDY COMM'N, REPORT OF THE
PRIVACY PROTECTION STUDY, THE CITIZEN AS TAXPAYER app. 2, at 6 (1977).
The report states:
[T]o fulfill the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the
Internal Revenue Service collects and maintains vast amounts of
information about all individual taxpayers. Congress has determined
that the compelling societal need to finance government activities
warrants the intrusion into the lives of individuals that compliance
with the Internal Revenue Code inevitably entails.
Id.; see also Cynthia Blum, The Flat Tax: A Panacea for Privacy
Concerns?, 54 AM. U. L. REV. 1241, 1281 (2005) ("[T]he manner in
which the IRS generally obtains information about investment income
(Form 1040 or Form 1099) is not particularly intrusive.").
(79) See generally John J. Thorndike, Wall Street, Washington, and
the Business of Information Reporting, 110 TAX NOTES 787 (Feb. 13, 2006)
(reviewing the history of information reporting and the industry's
reluctance to undertake such reporting responsibilities).
(80) See, e.g., A Closer Look at the Size and Sources of the Tax
Gap: Hearing Before the U.S. S. Comm. on Finance Subcomm. on Taxation
and IRS Oversight, 109th Cong. 28 (2006) (statement of the Honorable J.
Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration),
reprinted in J. Russell George, TIGTA Says More Resources Are Needed to
Close the Tax Gap, 2006 TNT 144-52 (July 27, 2006) ("Strategies
have been identified to decrease the tax gap and improvements can be
realized; however, sufficient resources are needed to ensure compliance
with the tax laws.").
(81) Senate Fin. Comm., Finance Approves Use of Tax Code to Crack
Down on Sex Trafficking, 2006 TNT 125-25 (June 29, 2006).
(82) In fiscal year 2000, the overall audit rate for individuals
was at a historic low of 49%. Internal Revenue Serv., Statement by IRS
Commissioner Charles O. Rossotti on Audit and Collection Activity for
Fiscal 2000, 2001 TNT 33-11 (Feb. 15, 2001). The rate continues to be
fairly low. See INTERNAL REVENUE SERV., DATA BOOK 2005, PUBL'N 55B
(2006), available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05databk.pdf
(indicating that 67% of individual income tax returns filed during
fiscal year 2005 were examined). But see Mark W. Everson, Everson Touts
Improved Enforcement Statistics, 2006 TNT 224-18 (Nov. 21, 2006) (noting
that compliance efforts have increased over the last several years,
resulting in a larger percentage of audited returns).
(83) See generally Lederman, supra note 66.
(84) See, e.g., Tax Gap Testimony, supra note 1 ("Simplifying
the tax code or fundamental tax reform has the potential to reduce the
tax gap by billions of dollars."); Wesley Elmore, Rangel Says Tax
Simplification Would Lead to "Trillions of Dollars" in
Savings, 2006 TNT 224-2 (Nov. 21, 2006). Yet, deciding how Congress
should simplify the Code is fraught with challenges. See, e.g., STAFF OF
THE JOINT COMM. ON TAXATION, 107TH CONG., STUDY OF THE OVERALL STATE OF
THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIMPLIFICATION, PURSUANT
TO 8022(3)(B) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 (Comm. Print 2001)
(detailing all the sources of the Code's complexity); THE
PRESIDENT'S ADVISORY PANEL ON FED. TAX REFORM, SIMPLE, FAIR, AND
PRO-GROWTH: PROPOSALS TO FIX AMERICA'S TAX SYSTEM (Nov. 2005)
(offering different approaches to simplify the tax system); William G.
Gale & Janet Holtzblatt, The Role of Administrative Issues in Tax
Reform: Simplicity, Compliance, and Administration, in UNITED STATES TAX
REFORM IN THE 21ST CENTURY 179, 206-07 (George R. Zodrow & Peter
Mieskowski eds., 2002) (noting that determination of the number of a
taxpayer's qualified dependents would be just as difficult under
the flat tax as under the income tax); Deborah L. Paul, The Sources of
Tax Complexity: How Much Simplicity Can Fundamental Tax Reform Achieve?,
76 N.C. L. REV. 151, 155 (1997) (noting that the desire for equitable
distribution of tax liabilities has resulted in tax system complexity).
(85) See, e.g., I.R.S. Notice 2000-44, 2000-2 C.B. 255 (warning
taxpayers not to use grantor trusts as a vehicle to camouflage their tax
shelter losses lest they risk the imposition of possible criminal
penalties).
(86) See, e.g., Michael J. Graetz, 100 Million Unnecessary Returns:
A Fresh Start for the U.S. Tax System, 112 YALE L.J. 261 (2002)
(advocating the use of a blended consumption and income tax regime);
Deborah H. Schenk, Simplification for Individual Taxpayers: Problems and
Proposals, 45 TAX L. REV. 121 (1989) (offering numerous proposals to
simplify the existing income tax system).
(87) See NATIONAL TAXPAYER ADVOCATE REPORT, supra note 50, at 381
(identifying unreported cash income as likely the largest single
component of the tax gap).
(88) Id.
(89) See supra note 1.
(90) Compania de Tabacos v. Collector, 275 U.S. 87, 100 (1927)
(Holmes, J., dissenting).
COPYRIGHT 2007 Virginia Tax
Review Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.