Consumer demand for fresh-cut produce has been drastically
increasing. Cutting sweet potatoes into different sizes or shapes adds
value to this fresh product. However, this practice also accelerates
deterioration in the product's quality and shortens its shelflife.
Based on preliminary studies, researchers at Louisiana State
University found that a coating of chitosan could be used to prolong the
shelflife of fresh-cut sweet potatoes for up to 17 days under
refrigerated storage conditions. They were able to demonstrate the
potential of the coating to preserve product quality and extend the
shelflife of fresh-cut sweet potatoes. Their work involved evaluating
sensory differences and consumer acceptability of the potatoes after up
to 17 days of refrigerated storage. They also were able to identify the
sensory attributes that determine the purchase intent of consumers for
this product.
The scientists washed the sweet potatoes, then peeled and cut them
into 13-mm cubes. The cubes were coated with 1% weight/volume (w/v) 470
kDa of chitosan in 1% acetic acid. They were stored in sealed plastic
containers at 4 C for up to 17 days. Non-coated samples served as the
controls.
One hundred consumers compared all of the samples with the controls
to determine any sensory differences in terms of orange color, surface
moistness, surface glossiness and surface odor. Consumers evaluated the
samples' acceptability of appearance, color, odor, surface
moistness, surface glossiness and overall liking, using a nine-point
hedonic scale. Overall acceptance and purchase intent were evaluated
using a binomial--yes/no--scale.
The investigators found that the coated samples stored for 17 days
were not significantly different from the noncoated samples tested on
the first day in terms of overall difference, orange color, surface
moistness and surface glossiness, except for a surface odor caused by
the odor of acetic acid. The coated 17-day samples were preferred less
than the noncoated and coated samples tested on the first day, with a
mean hedonic score of 5.2 and a 61.6% positive overall acceptance
rating. The product's appearance and odor, but not surface
glossiness, were attributes that determined consumers' purchase
intent.
Further information. Witoon Prinyawiwatkul, Department of Food
Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 11 Food Science
Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; phone: 225-578-5188; fax: 225-578-5300;
email: wprinyawiwatkul@agcenter.lsu.edu.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Food Technology Intelligence,
Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.