Hypothesis 3 stated that male study participants would give more
cognitive effort, as indexed through heart rate, to sports featuring
male athletes while Hypothesis 4 predicted that female study
participants would give more cognitive effort to sports featuring female
athletes. Statistical analyses show that there is a significant
interaction of athlete sex on heart rate for male participants only,
F(6, 138) = 2.75, p = .02, [[epsilon].sup.2]] = .06, and not for female
participants, F(6, 132) = 1.64, p = .14. An examination of the graph of
heart rate scores for male participants shows that the heart rate data
partially supports this hypothesis. The graph shows that through the
first half of the message, sports featuring male athletes and sports
featuring female athletes appear to elicit the same level of cognitive
effort (lines are parallel). At approximately the halfway point, a
deceleration occurs while viewing sports featuring male athletes. See
Figure 1. The polynomial trend contrasts performed on this data suggest
that the pattern of deceleration of heart rate changes is significant
between the two conditions, F(1,23) = 10.34, p = .004, [[epsilon].sup.2]
= .28.
For Hypotheses 5 and 6 predictions were made about which content
would be encoded better for male and female participants, as indexed
through mean recognition scores. Hypothesis 5 predicted that male study
participants would better encode sports featuring male athletes, while
Hypothesis 6 predicted that female study participants would better
encode female sports, as indexed through recognition scores. For
Hypothesis 5, though the difference in the mean scores was significant,
F(1, 23) = 9.42, p = .005, [[epsilon].sup.2] = .26, mean recognition
scores show that male participants received better recognition scores
for sports featuring female athletes (M = .51, SD = .10) than for sports
featuring male athletes (M = .45, SD = .14). This held true for female
participants in Hypothesis 6; female participants did significantly
encode and recognize female sports (M = .48, SD = .09) better than male
sports (M = .36, SD = .08), F(1, 22) = 24.55, p < .001,
[[epsilon].sup.2] = .50.
Discussion
The primary purpose of this study was to examine how male viewers
and female viewers differ in their physiological and cognitive
processing of sports messages that feature either male athletes or
female athletes. What came out of this experiment were some very
interesting results. Though sports with male athletes elicited higher
self-reported levels of arousal, physiological arousal did not tell the
same story; heart rate decreased for all participants while viewing
sports featuring female athletes, indicating more attentional resources
were given to these messages and higher scores on the recognition
questions from the sports with female athletes were achieved by all
participants.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Sports that feature male athletes are the typical television fare.
It is easy to see why when examined under the lens of social dominance
orientation. Social dominance orientation, as reviewed earlier, is a
personality variable that provides for an individual to have a personal
preference for a social group to which they belong to be perceived as
superior to other social groups (Pratto et al., 1994; Sidanius &
Pratto, 1999); it also allows for groups that can be considered socially
weak to have a difficult time in attempting to overcome these perceived
societal hierarchical structures. Televised sports demonstrate and
strengthen the societal division between men and women through their
portrayals of male athletes and female athletes. Male athletes are shown
as strong, disciplined, and competitive while female athletes are
portrayed as emotional, graceful, and passive (Koivula, 2001; Laberge
& Albert, 1999). Social dominance orientation seems to come through
as a possible reason for response biases in the data for self-reported
arousal.
It is also easy to see why television sports is dominated by male
athletes given the self-report results reported here and the industry
reliance on self-report data of viewer preferences. In reviewing the
results for self-reported arousal, both male and female participants
self-reported feeling more aroused while watching sports that featured
male athletes; in fact, athlete sex had a significant effect on
self-reported arousal scores for both segments of the participant
population. What is interesting to note is that, even though
self-reported arousal and skin conductance readings should somewhat
correlate (Greenwald et al., 1989), in this study they did not. Though
sports with male athletes garnered a significantly higher level of
self-reported arousal than sports with female athletes, skin conductance
responses showed that there were no significant differences in
physiological arousal responses to the viewing of sports featuring male
or female athletes. This finding may lend credence to the idea of a
response bias; individuals have been taught to believe that sports with
male athletes are inherently more exciting and arousing, therefore
leading to higher self-report scores on their emotional arousal, while
their physiological readings belie that possibility by demonstrating
that the human body is similarly aroused by sports featuring male or
female athletes.
The principles of social dominance orientation allow for such
response biases to occur; male study participants report higher levels
of arousal-while watching sports featuring male athletes than sports
featuring female athletes in order to maintain their perceived social
dominance over women. With male athletes constantly being portrayed as a
superior group to female athletes, it is not surprising that male
participants would report feeling more aroused while watching male
athletes. The conceptualization of social dominance orientation asserts
that members of a group perceived as superior would work toward
continuing their superiority. In this study, male participants appear to
agree with the accepted hierarchy and enjoy sports featuring male
athletes because of their inherent membership in the
"superior" group. At the same time, the self-reported arousal
ratings by female participants for sports with female athletes were
larger than that of male participants, though, which suggests that these
women were attempting to break away from the accepted belief that male
athletes are superior to female athletes. Social dominance orientation
allows for members of the out-group to attempt to better their social
standing (Sidanius, 1993; Wilson & Liu, 2003); though speculative,
these results suggest that this is what is being attempted by the female
viewers.
Research indicates that women do not adhere to the concepts behind
social dominance orientation as stringently as men (Pratto, Stallworth,
Sidanius, & Siers, 1997; Sidanius et al., 1994); in some cases men
believe more in maintaining the hierarchical structure of society than
women believe in the need for changing it. In the case of the current
study, these women may subscribe to some of the same stereotypical
societal ideas behind masculinity and femininity, which in turns lends
itself to these perceptions of men's and women's participation
in sports. These beliefs about acceptable roles in certain facets of
society could feasibly explain the overall higher arousal ratings by
female participants for sports with male athletes than for sports with
female athletes.
A possible explanation for these differences in emotional and
cognitive responses to sports that feature male and female athletes is
the possible novelty effect of viewing female athletes. Sports with
female athletes, as compared to sports with male athletes, are broadcast
on television rather infrequently. Both male and female participants had
a significant decrease in heart rate while watching sports with female
athletes, more so than during male sports clips. Sports featuring female
athletes were also recognized better by both male and female
participants than sports featuring male athletes. Due to this ability to
better recognize the content of the footage featuring female athletes,
it is reasonable to conclude that an increased amount of resources were
allocated toward the encoding of the message's content (A. Lang,
2000).
COPYRIGHT 2008 Broadcast Education
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.