Why are export tariffs for fertilizers increased
again?
by Jianli, Li
On February 15th the General Administration of Customs announced a
new regulation readjusting the export tariff rates of partially chemical
fertilizers. The export tariff rates of mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP)
and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) are increased to 35% and the export
tariff rate of compound fertilizers is also increased to 35% effective
February 15th, 2008 to September 30th, 2008. An export tariff rate of
20% will be implemented for both MAP, DAP and compound fertilizers from
October 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2008. In the preceding scheme for
readjusting the export tariff rates of chemical fertilizers published at
the end of 2007, the export of both MAP and DAP were to bear an export
tariff rate of 20% in the first and fourth quarters and a rate of 30% in
the second and third quarters. Why are the export tariff rates of MAP,
DAP and compound fertilizers being increased again after less than two
months'? Can the upward adjustment to the tariff reduce the
overheated export of ammonium phosphate? Can it really help ease the
prominent supply shortage of chemical fertilizers in the spring?
March is the month for preparing chemical fertilizers to be used in
spring plowing. Neither the present delivery nor the inventory of
ammonium phosphate is promising. Experts think that judging from the
current situation of the chemical fertilizer market in China, there will
surely be a shortage of phosphate fertilizers this year. "To
guarantee a sufficient supply of phosphate fertilizers during the
chemical fertilizer application period, the only remedy is that no
ammonium phosphate is to be exported in the two months of January and
February," said an executive from Anhui Liuguo Chemical Co., Ltd.
(SH: 600470). "Nearly 1.5 million tons of ammonium phosphate
resources can then be retained in the domestic market." Only in
this way can the shortage be eased. As things stand, even without export
control the export of ammonium phosphate would have a fundamental
bottleneck. Due to the snowstorm in the southern region of China this
January, many fertilizer manufacturers could not produce normally.
Nevertheless, many fertilizer manufacturers are still trying to fulfill
the export orders previously placed. The DAP price in the international
market has also increased continuously, encouraging DAP manufacturers to
export. The shortage of phosphate fertilizers, in particular
concentrated phosphate compound fertilizers, in the domestic market this
year has become a problem that cannot be ignored.
According to Wang Ying, senior engineer of China National Chemical
Information Center, the new tariff policy for DAP and MAP is intended to
ease the supply crisis of phosphate fertilizer resources in China. With
the impact from the snowstorm in the south, many phosphate compound
fertilizer producers have discontinued production or maintained only a
low operating rate. The production of these units can be fully restored
only after March. It is expected that the supply of phosphate compound
fertilizers this spring will be 40% lower than the same period of 2007.
The huge supply shortage and the drastic price rise of raw materials
have led to a price rise of chemical fertilizers. To safeguard the
stability of the chemical fertilizer market, China has twice issued
policies concerning the export of chemical fertilizers in a very short
period of time, hoping to reduce the export of chemical fertilizers and
guarantee an adequate supply for the domestic market. Some experts,
however, have different views. They think that the imposition of a 35%
export tariff rate on compound fertilizers will have no appreciable
effect on export control because the proportion of compound fertilizers
among exported chemical fertilizers is relatively small. Besides, triple
superphosphate, which is always heavily exported (60% of triple
superphosphate produced in China is exported), has never been included
in chemical fertilizer varieties bearing export tariffs. As a matter of
fact, some MAP/DAP production units in China are designed on the basis
of the triple superphosphate production process and therefore can be
shifted to produce triple superphosphate with some minor modifications.
To evade the high export tariff, some enterprises have already said that
they will shift to produce triple superphosphate to reduce the export
cost.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Market analysts think that an export tariff rate of 20%, or even
30%, is enough to contain the export, let alone to retain more goods in
the domestic market. At the present exchange rate of Renminbi to U.S.
dollars, the export price of phosphate fertilizers can still leave a
certain profit margin to exporters, although the margin is narrower than
before. The increase of the export tariff rate for MAP/DAP can hardly
contain the export, but it will likely stop the construction of new
ammonium phosphate projects and therefore reduce or even avoid unneeded
capacity expansion.
By Li Jianli, China National Chemical Information Center
COPYRIGHT 2008 China National Chemical Information
Center Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.