WAIKOLOA, HAWAII -- Nevi displaying a specific high-risk pattern on
dermoscopy appear to indicate a several-fold greater melanoma risk than
is conferred by the presence of clinical dysplastic nevi, Dr. Allan C.
Halpern said at the annual Hawaii dermatology seminar sponsored by Skin
Disease Education Foundation.
This finding from a recent pilot study that he characterized as
"very small, preliminary, but thought provoking" suggests
dermoscopy may enable physicians to do a significantly better job of
identifying patients at high risk of developing melanoma, said Dr.
Halpern, chief of the dermatology service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center, New York, and cochairman of the National Council on Skin
Cancer Prevention.
For the past couple of decades, experts have considered the
presence of dysplastic nevi to be one of the most potent available
markers of increased risk of melanoma. Dysplastic nevi are a stronger
risk factor than total skin nevus number, which in turn conveys more
information about melanoma risk than does skin complexion.
Although factors including fair hair, eyes, and skin color or a
propensity to burn rather than tan are widely recognized markers, they
are in fact relatively modest risk factors, conferring relative risks on
the order of 1.5-2. "If you look at my waiting room, with a
melanoma-oriented practice, more than half the people are brunettes with
type-3 or-4 skin," the dermatologist observed. Similarly, while
family history of melanoma is another important risk factor, having a
parent or sibling with melanoma confers only a 2.5-to 3-fold increased
relative risk. It's only in the much smaller subgroup of
individuals with both an affected parent and sibling that the risk
really soars to about ninefold.
"When you think about the fact that there are close to 100,000
new cases of melanoma diagnosed each year in the U.S.--combining
melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma--and that an estimated 750,000
people with melanoma are alive today, the chance of having a family
member with melanoma outside the familial melanoma setting, by chance
alone, is pretty high," Dr. Halpern continued.
Numerous studies have shown that dysplastic nevi are an independent
risk factor for melanoma and that the relative risk climbs as the number
of dysplastic nevi increases. Although risk estimates vary, two
dysplastic nevi are often associated with a roughly twofold increased
relative risk of melanoma, five with a five-or sixfold increased risk,
and so forth. Dysplastic nevi are present in 2%-8% of whites. They are
defined clinically as nevi at least 5 mm in size with a flat component
and at least two of the three following criteria: indistinct borders,
variable pigmentation, and an irregular asymmetric outline. Dysplastic
nevi are markers of risk, not obligate precursors. Although melanoma
sometimes arises within a dysplastic nevus, the melanoma risk extends to
normal-appearing skin, so there is no point in trying to
prophylactically remove dysplastic nevi, he stressed.
To test the hypothesis that dermoscopic pattern might do a better
job of defining patients at high risk for melanoma than might
identification of clinical dysplastic nevi, Dr. Halpern and his
coinvestigators assessed in unblinded fashion dermoscopic images of 187
individual nevi from the backs of 20 patients with invasive melanoma and
150 nevi from 20 age- and gender-matched controls at very high risk for
melanoma. Participants had numerous moles, including multiple dysplastic
nevi.
In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the finding of what
the investigators called a complex global dermoscopic pattern was
associated with a highly significant 2.9-fold increase in melanoma risk.
They defined a complex global pattern as one in which both a reticular
pigment network and globules were seen in the lesion.
In contrast, the dermoscopic finding of dots in a nevus was
associated with a 50% reduction in the likelihood of melanoma (Br. J.
Dermatol. 2008 [Epuh doi: 10.1111 / j. 1365-2133.2007.08404.x]).
"The interesting thing is this study was absolutely,
positively weighted against finding anything, because we were looking at
patients at such high-end risk. So the results suggest there may be
something much better than clinical examination among our patients with
dysplastic nevi to define which ones are at greater risk," Dr.
Halpern said.
SDEF and this news organization are wholly owned subsidiaries of
Elsevier.
BY BRUCE JANCIN
Denver Bureau
COPYRIGHT 2008 International Medical News
Group Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.