Arthritis creates work limitations for about a third of the
working-age adults with the disease, impacting nearly 7% of the total
U.S. workforce, according to a state-by-state study by the Centers for
Disease Control.
The first-of-its-kind survey, drawing on data from the Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System, may foreshadow a profound challenge to
the economy as the population ages. Arthritis today affects 46 million
Americans, with an estimated economic toll of $128 billion a year,
according to the Arthritis Foundation.
The random-digit-dialed telephone survey of more than 200,000
households queried working-age adults in every state, Washington, Guam,
Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands about whether they had been
diagnosed with arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or
fibromyalgia. Respondents with arthritis were asked whether arthritis or
joint symptoms currently affected whether they were employed and the
type and amount of work they could do.
The responses were weighted to represent the adult population in
each state.
A high degree of variability was found in the state-specific
prevalence of arthritis-related work limitations among all adults
between 18 and 64 years of age, from 3.4% of adults in Hawaii to 15% in
Kentucky, reported Kristina A. Theis and her associates at the National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and the National Center on Birth
Defects and Developmental Disability at the CDC (MMWR 2007;56:1045-9).
Among adults reporting physician-diagnosed arthritis and related
conditions, work limitations were reported by a median 33%, ranging from
25.1% in Nevada to 51.3% in Kentucky.
"That's huge," Ms. Theis said in a telephone
interview.
"In Kentucky, that represents every other person with
arthritis a doctor might be seeing."
Preventing or minimizing work-related limitations through timely
therapy, rehabilitation, and workplace accommodation has an impact not
only on the economy as a whole, but also on the individual
patients' independence, self-esteem, and financial well-being, she
stressed.
"It is not always on the physicians' radar screen to
inquire, 'How's your function? How's your pain? And by
the way, how is that function and pain impacting you at
work?'" Ms. Theis said.
Rheumatologists in the states with the highest and lowest levels of
work limitations reported by adults with arthritis said that patient
characteristics and the availability of services may play into
differences seen across populations.
In Elizabethtown, Ky., rheumatologist Dr. Daksha Mehta said that
some patients travel more than 100 miles to see her.
Although there is a nationwide shortage of board-certified
rheumatologists, "I'm sure it's worse in Kentucky,"
she said.
Access to medical specialists, as well as experts in occupational
therapy and workplace ergonomics, may be limited in small, isolated
rural communities. Additionally, many patients still do not recognize
the need for early diagnosis and treatment, despite educational efforts
by rheumatology groups statewide, she said.
"Personally, I have patients with arthritis who are still
working at their factory jobs, still farming, but that's with
appropriate therapy [and] medications, having physical and occupational
therapy, doing home strengthening exercises," said Dr. Mehta of the
Center for Arthritis and Osteoporosis.
Rheumatologist Rex Adams of Arthritis Associates of Nevada in Reno
said he doubted that the types of jobs performed in his state differ
much from those practiced in Kentucky, which has double the prevalence
of work-related limitations reported by working-age adults with
arthritis.
"Mining is big in Nevada, and there are a lot of service
industry workers here. There is a lot of physical work," he said.
"Maybe it's because we're just good rheumatologists
who keep everyone working!" he joked.
On a more serious note, Dr. Adams speculated that the variation
might be explained by systemic factors, such as differences in state
disability program formats, or perhaps populations. Nevada draws a
"pretty young, healthy population" with a large percentage of
workers who have recently moved from other locations, whereas
Kentucky's population may be older and more stationary.
In both states, rheumatologists said they advocate a team approach
to arthritis management, with an emphasis on therapy and lifestyle
modifications as well as medication. Occupational and physical therapy
are offered on-site in a growing number of group rheumatology practices.
Such trends could make a difference in patients' ability to
maintain their ability to perform their jobs, said Ms. Theis, of the
CDC's Division of Adult and Community Health.
Preliminary findings from a separate CDC study build on a growing
body of published research suggesting that physician recommendations
concerning arthritis management are highly influential in terms of
patient behavior, Ms. Theis explained.
When a physician recommends weight loss, an arthritis-focused
exercise program, or workplace accommodations in conjunction with the
Americans with Disabilities Act, for example, patients are much more
likely to attempt to follow that advice.
"We're hoping physicians will say, 'I have a really
important voice that carries a lot of weight on a lot of
levels,'" Ms. Theis said. "We see them as one of our most
important audiences."
Sometimes, the physician's role on minimizing work limitations
is direct, perhaps by prescribing traditional therapy regimens and even
biologic therapy to patients early enough in the course of their disease
to preserve function.
Other times, a physician may refer a patient to physical or
occupational therapy, or to a hand surgeon for a customized thumb or a
wrist splint that permits normal workplace activities, said Diana
Baldwin, an occupational therapist at the Missouri Arthritis
Rehabilitation and Training Center.
"We've found that it isn't enough to tell people,
'Cut back on your hours,' or 'Be more flexible,' or
'Don't do things that hurt,'" she said. "For
the average working person with arthritis, that is not useful."
What does seem to make a difference is when physicians explain to
arthritis patients early on that their joints are more vulnerable to
common workplace conditions such as tendonitis or lower back pain, and
provide a reasonable rationale for them to implement protective
strategies, she said.
The Missouri Training Center in Columbia is currently completing a
federally funded study that has randomized 84 adults with arthritis to
receive either written materials about arthritis in the workplace or
interventions conducted by Ms. Baldwin in the work setting, be it a
manufacturing workshop, business office, or classroom.
She has spent 1.5-2 hours interviewing these workers with arthritis
and then has studied them as they work, taking pictures that she will
later diagram to show movements that stress the joints including
twisting, grabbing, reaching, and bending.
She has investigated ergonomic surgical tools to aid an
anesthesiologist, adapted the car of a traveling salesman, and added a
step stool to ease a manufacturing specialist's reach to a drill
press.
Making such changes early on appears to keep people in the
workplace longer, working more effectively and in less pain, she said.
But economic realities have proved to be a barrier to early
workplace interventions, particularly in the lower-paying, rigorous jobs
that put the greatest stress on joints.
No janitors have agreed to allow Ms. Baldwin to come to their
workplaces to identify practices that might be exacerbating their
arthritis, for example.
"They're not going to expose the fact that they have
arthritis on the job," she said.
BY BETSY BATES
Los Angeles Bureau
COPYRIGHT 2007 International Medical News
Group Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.