MANY COMPANIES BASED IN CHINA are governed by a strong,
group-motivated work ethic. In other words, an individual's success
and fulfillment depends on the entire team's work measurement. With
respect to group dynamics and goals, it's customary for some
workers to remain at the office through the night or seven days a week
until a desired outcome is reached. Shop floor environments with human
resources departments tend to lead the way in lean efforts because of
their training in communications, improvement planning, performance
appraisal, safety, and organizational systems.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
A prominent pump manufacturing plant in Shanghai, China, was an old
company with a history of more than 50 years. After an American
corporation acquired it for manufacturing vacuum pumps and related
accessories, the plant navigated workers through tremendous process
changes.
Before its lean journey began, the company teetered on the threat
of closure because of ineffective organization, lack of staff
cooperation, disproportional waste, and a lack of visual control and
standard work ethics. Top management realized the importance of lean
manufacturing and eventually committed to a program that was codified by
the human resources department.
Often taking a back seat in modern conversations about lean, human
resources can play an important role during lean transformation and
implementation. It should be understood that lean production or lean
policy is not only about 5S or eliminating wastes but also about
people's behavior, human culture, teamwork, leadership, and
executive force. At the manufacturing plant, line workers, executives,
and the logistics department adopted and advanced lean principles
through a carefully created plan by human resources.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
According to Jamie Flinchbaugh, founder and partner of the Lean
Learning Center, human resources can help accelerate a successful lean
transformation in the following areas:
* Development of teams as a supporting structure of lean
* Communication among members, particularly across organizational
barriers
* Clarification of everyone's role and responsibilities in
lean transformation
* Acknowledgement and celebration of successes toward lean
transformation
"There are two facets to the relationship between lean and HR.
First, it is self-evident that the HR function--just like any other
department in a company--needs to apply lean practices and principles
toward process improvement in its own work," said Flinchbaugh.
"Second, the HR function, by virtue of its interactions with
virtually every part of a company, is actually an ideal position to be a
powerful ally in lean transformation, if lean leaders make the effort to
enlist its aid."
Persuasive measures
When the plant started the lean transformation, it didn't
approach human resources to get involved. At first, the responsible
person for plant lean implementation was busy every minute dealing with
trivial details. For example, he would spend 10 minutes drilling a hole
or looking for a screw. He didn't have time to sit down to think
about process improvement, layout configuration, or lofty goals toward
faster production. He didn't thoroughly benchmark or issue team
meetings or memos to ask for input. In essence, he was the designated
point person but didn't have much support from others.
Another problem is that at the beginning almost every operator at
the plant lacked exposure to lean thinking and manufacturing. What is
even worse is that there were no full-time assistants or outside
consultants to get things moving in the appropriate direction. I cringe
at the typical scenario: One operator learned something about 5S on the
first day yet the second day, switched on his former, outdated drilling
machine, and then another operator from the cleaning room learned
kaizen. Clearly there needed to be a succinct learning process in place
before the learning started. Workers realized that hours were being
wasted but too much time passed before approaching the human resources
director.
Eager to help, she showed great interest in taking part in the lean
transformation and launching an initial workshop for everyone to
participate in. Then the lean team was established and a leader was
appointed. Basic training and leadership workshops followed with some
operators from the low-key processes being pulled out to fulfill
permanent lean positions that gave them greater responsibilities and
ownership of brand new tasks. The spirit of the company shifted
immediately with these simple changes. This spirit instilled a
willingness to work harder and in a different manner when required.
Staff then learned about the organizational capability and culture
of the company. Before discussion of lean, these workers had assumed
positions without being informed of their company's basic
principles and how they wanted to be perceived by the public. Should
they be a low-profile multinational manufacturer or expand and serve the
public in some way such as community outreach to create a new image
(after the takeover)? Should employees be cross-trained in various
departments? These were all concerns that human resources helped to
answer.
Organizational capability is an enterprise's ability to manage
people and products in an efficient way to gain a competitive advantage.
Gerhardt Schulmeyer, president of the North American branch of ABB, a
technology-based provider of power and automation products, said that it
is not the physical facilities but the organizational capability that
will differentiate success from failure of the enterprise.
Organizational capability focuses on leadership, cooperation, shared
mindset, and readiness for change and improvement.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Creating an effective team is a practical way to build
organizational capability. Since lean production aims to create more
value-added products for customers with less waste to win the market
through cooperation between organizations within the company, a
team-oriented and flexible organization will be more helpful than the
vertically integrated organization. Uniform integration involves staff
with various experiences and different core competences to focus on one
lean project in a certain period; therefore, it's necessary to
establish a lean team in which each member feels empowered to think and
act as a leader.
Group cohesion will provide better coordination of the project
tasks and rotate staff between the project team and the departments. For
example, suppose the sales department is excellent at getting orders
from customers, but the manufacturing department cannot build the
products with satisfactory quality due to bad workshop management, or
worse, the logistics department cannot deliver the products to the
customer on time. What is the end result? Most likely one less customer!
At the plant, human resources maximized organizational capability
by assigning duties and deadlines to each employee. While one employee
determined financial capability, another took charge of marketing
capability. They identified people who could be "culture
carriers" to build the transformation teams. Seniority and
enthusiasm played a role in who became leaders.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Urgent call
Resistance to change, even when on the path to improvement,
requires bold techniques to motivate staff as it did at the pump
manufacturing plant. Motivate the people with leadership to direct the
team, then establish a sense of company crisis to convince the staff
that transformation is the only way for survival in the fierce market
competition. Create a scene in which the house is burning but the people
living in it are turning their blind eye to it. Witness your human
resources department arouse them from sleep with their dependable
communication, motivational, and safety skills.
In truth, our facility was not physically burning down, but
metaphorically speaking, the company slipped way too close to the
flames. The human resources department prepared a package of materials
including market share, customer complaints, and strong points and weak
points of our company and competitors with the help of sales and
marketing personnel. They selected pertinent and practical case studies
to be presented in rich media that caught our attention. The employees
were impressed and inspired by a usually behind-the-scenes department
caring enough to provide a structure for lean.
With the aid of human resources, we reshaped the warehouse
department to include the logistics control department. Supported by
warehouse workers, logistics had the following main tasks:
* Motivate the external supplier to deliver quality parts just in
time.
* Plan to order parts based on the minimum amount allowed on the
production line in-progress, on the shelves, in the packaging area, and
in delivery.
* Command the internal supplier to deliver the machined parts
directly to the assembly spot from where operators can easily get them
with the help of a kanban system.
* Fill in for warehouse personnel when necessary.
At the same time, rules were set for operators in the machine
workshop. They bear the responsibility of assuring the quality of the
parts they processed with the guidance of quality inspectors. They also
ensure that defect-proof parts flow to the next station or to the
assembly. Their performance on quality control has much to do with their
salary and bonus.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Institute of Industrial Engineers,
Inc. (IIE) Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.