Addressing the most common franchisee claims:
common-sense steps that franchise systems often fail to
apply.
by Brody, Mary Beth
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
One thing that all franchisors can agree upon is that litigation
with franchisees is a no-win situation. Even if the franchisor prevails
on all claims, it takes an incredible toll on the franchisor and the
franchise system. This article focuses on two areas in which a
franchisor can make a big difference by taking steps to avoid the most
common varieties of franchise litigation.
The most common claims brought by franchisees against franchisors
include breach of contract, fraud and misrepresentation, breach of the
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of
franchise laws. While the claims are similar, the circumstances giving
rise to them are often quite different. Two of the key areas in which a
franchisor can take proactive steps to avoid such claims are in the
franchise sales process and in franchisee communications. While the
steps suggested are part of an effective litigation-prevention strategy,
they are also best business practices for building a strong brand and a
strong franchise system.
The Sales Process
The franchise sales process has always been fertile ground for
franchisee claims. It also is one of the areas over which franchisors
can and should exert a great deal of control. The steps franchisors
should take to avoid claims arising from the sales process fall into
three distinct categories. The first is the most obvious: franchise
sales compliance. Every franchisor must have a formal franchise sales
compliance program and must communicate to its staff that compliance is
a top priority within the franchisor organization. At a minimum, the
sales compliance program must ensure that: the franchise disclosure
document and exhibits are accurate, complete and not misleading; the
franchisor is registered or exempt in all states in which it conducts
any sales activity; all of the franchisor's personnel who will have
dealings with prospects are completely familiar with the contents of the
disclosure document and other franchise documents (so that they do not
make any statements which are inconsistent with the documents) and are
fully trained in the "dos" and "don'ts" of
franchise sales; and there are processes to monitor the sales process
including appropriate checklists, franchisee acknowledgment forms and
similar items.
Other important components of a sales compliance program include
designating and empowering a sales compliance officer and conducting
sales compliance training at regular intervals. Beyond these concrete
steps, it is critical that the highest level of management instill
throughout the franchisor team a true appreciation and respect for sales
compliance and disclosure. If there is an attitude that the franchise
laws and disclosure obligations are merely a "nuisance" that
sometimes get in the way of closing sales, the likelihood of sales
violations will increase and so will the risk of franchisee litigation.
The second component of an effective sales process is more of a
business component than a legal component, but it is probably the most
critical area for avoiding franchisee litigation. It is the actual
process that is involved in determining which franchisee candidates will
be awarded franchises. The single biggest mistake that franchisors,
especially start-up franchisors, make is to sell franchises to the wrong
people. If there is not an effective screening process, the franchisees
who enter the system are less likely to be qualified and more likely to
struggle and fail. These, of course, are also the very franchisees who
are most likely to sue. One key aspect of the screening procedure is the
development of a profile of the ideal franchisee candidate. If the
franchisor does not have a profile, it will be much easier to sign on a
franchisee who does not have the skill set, personality traits, or
financial resources necessary to succeed.
Another key aspect of the screening procedure is to structure the
sales process in a fashion that allows the franchisor to evaluate
whether the prospect is able and willing to follow procedures. To do
this, the franchisor must have a step-by-step process through which all
candidates proceed. If, for example, Step 3 in the process requires
prospects to submit their financial and bank information by a certain
date and the candidate does not follow through, this may signal that the
franchisee is not likely to follow directions from others or does not
respect deadlines or timetables set by others. If this same candidate
fails to follow through on additional steps in the sales process, the
franchisor should be getting a clear message that this will probably not
be a compliant franchisee. The sales process is the time to weed out
problem franchisees--not after they are part of the franchise system. A
successful franchisor knows when to walk away from a marginal candidate,
and how to identify which candidates are marginal. It cannot be
emphasized enough that selecting the best possible candidates not only
helps prevent litigation, but it is the most important thing a
franchisor does to build on the strength and reputation of its system.
The third component of the sales process relates to the screening
process, but merits separate consideration, in part, because it may run
counter to basic sales principles. In many businesses, the most
important job for the sales person is to get the sale. That is fine when
the salesperson is selling cars, refrigerators, insurance or other
commodities. When the sale entails a long-term relationship between the
parties such as is the case in franchising, there are more critical
considerations than just closing the sale. It is absolutely imperative
that throughout the sales process the franchisor and staff manage the
expectations of the prospective franchisee. The franchisee who signs on
with unrealistic expectations of potential profit, capital requirements,
the amount of time needed to devote to the business, or any other aspect
of the franchise will be an unhappy business owner and is likely to
blame the franchisor for his disappointment and perceived problems.
Franchisee Communication
Establishing and maintaining strong lines of communication with
franchisees is a critical component to a successful franchise system.
Effective communication can also serve as a powerful deterrent to
franchisee lawsuits. It is part of human nature that franchisees, like
everyone else, have a basic need to be heard and to be validated. Even
if the franchisor does not agree with a franchisee on a particular
issue, if the franchisee genuinely feels that the franchisor understood
and appreciated his concerns, this will often alleviate unnecessary
hostility and resentment. The precise forums and vehicles for effective
franchisee communication may vary somewhat with the size and the
particular characteristics of the franchise system.
For start-up franchisors, effective communication may take the form
of regular e-mails, telephone calls and onsite visits. As the system
grows, establishing a franchisee advisory council or similar body which
provides input on various areas may be appropriate. However, for an
advisory council to be effective, it must have meaningful input on the
issues and must be recognized by the general franchise population as
representing franchisee interests. Some franchisors set up a franchisee
advisory council consisting of hand-picked franchisor favorites whom the
franchisor expects to rubber-stamp its decisions. This type of council
probably does more harm than good. Regardless of the form franchisee
input takes, it will not be effective unless franchisees feel empowered
to participate in the present and future direction of the franchise
system.
Many franchisee advisory councils provide input on advertising and
marketing programs, convention planning and other franchisee meetings.
In addition, they often provide input on new products or services to be
offered by the franchise system. If the advisory council is regarded as
a representative body with real input, it can be an incredible asset to
the franchisor when a franchisor is looking to implement a major change
in the system (another area that can be ripe for lawsuits). A change
that is supported by the franchisee advisory council is typically a much
easier "sell" to the rest of the franchise system.
Another key aspect of effective franchisee communication is having
internal procedures in place to resolve disputes when they arise. The
franchisor should have a process for dealing with franchisee complaints
before they take on a life of their own. As with the importance of
training the franchisor's staff on franchise sales compliance
issues, the franchisor should train its team on the proper procedures
for dealing with franchisee issues and complaints. This includes the
staff at franchisor's headquarters, as well as the field support.
If the franchisee's concerns are ignored or if the franchisee is
just told to "read the franchise agreement," the particular
issue is more likely to get blown out of proportion and contribute to
the franchisee's perception of unfair treatment by the franchisor.
COPYRIGHT 2008 International Franchise
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.