Chennat Gopalakrishnan, Cecilia Tortajada and Asit K. Biswas. Water
Institutions: Policies, Performance and Prospects. Berlin, Heidelberg,
Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005, 200 pp., $129.
This book is somewhat uneven since each chapter is written by
different individuals. It starts out with a very broad definition of
institutions that combines management of water organizations with the
more traditional definition of institutions that includes laws, rules,
regulations, and the cultural and political setting. The problem is that
not all chapters use this same definition of institutions, which means
the reader must be careful and determine which definition is being used.
Some of the chapters give a broad overview of a country's water
institutions and/or organizations while others focus on specific
institutions or organizations, such as the prior appropriation doctrine
as applied in the western United States or Sri Lanka's National
Water Supply and Drainage Board. Each chapter raises important policy
and research questions that need to be addressed as the editor of the
book states: "studies and analyses of water institutions have been
a neglected subject in the past" (p. v). Part of the reason for
this neglect may be the political sensitivity of the topics that are
raised by serious studies of organizations managing water and the
institutions that help determine who captures the rents. To highlight
these issues the book needs a concluding chapter to pull together the
different ideas and strategies suggested by the various authors.
In chapter 1, Gopalakrishan introduces the physical concept of
entropy and describes how he will use it to evaluate institutions. He
argues that institutions become dysfunctional when entropy intrudes.
Four constraints are identified that cause institutional entropy: (1)
lack of flexibility, (2) poor access to information, (3) lack of
autonomy, and (4) failure to incorporate local customs and concerns. The
chapter describes and evaluates Hawaii's water laws, political
processes, and water administration. Although the findings and
recommendations are quite reasonable, the chapter would have been
stronger if it had included data and analysis to support the conclusions
regarding past performance of the state water commission.
In chapter 2, Biswas focuses on Sri Lanka's National Water
Supply and Drainage Board (NWSDB) and its performance in water and
wastewater management in towns east and south of Colombo. The analysis
begins with a review of the roles public and private sector
organizations can play in managing water resources, with an emphasis on
the potential for expanding private sector involvement. This is followed
by a discussion of Sri Lanka's National Water Policy and
NWSDB's performance. One of the strengths of the chapter is the
discussion of water charges and the political problems involved in
raising them. The chapter concludes with estimates of potential cost
savings and revenue increases from greater private sector involvement in
NWSDB's water management activities.
Saleth, in chapter 3, focuses on three components of the
book's overly broad definition of institutions--water law, policy,
and administration. With the states having jurisdiction over water
within their borders, the central government is unable to provide the
guidance needed to reform the country's water institutions. Only
some of the more microlevel institutions are responding to the changing
water conditions as several states have been improving their water
rights by granting water leases and water passes. Still he argues India
has yet to embark on any serious reform that would need to include (1)
review of the center-states relationship, (2) development of a
country-level water law, (3) development of water rights, and (4) real
administrative reform with staff downsizing. Such institutional reform
is badly needed to provide constraints and guidance for both the public
and private sectors as they manage water and its allocation in this
rapidly changing society.
Again, chapter 4 provides a good overview of the water institutions
and the development of irrigation in China. Nickum is less ambitious
than Saleth and focuses primarily on irrigation districts where he finds
internal and external inertia so high that institutional change seems
almost intractable. Irrigation districts cover about 45 percent of
China's effectively irrigated area. Of the medium and large
reservoirs serving irrigation districts, nearly one-third were built in
the two years of the Great Leap Forward (1958-60) and were often of
dubious quality. Between 1965 and 1975, the total irrigation area
increased by half, primarily due to tube well irrigation and the
over-drafting of groundwater, which helped set the stage for reform
starting in the mid-1990s. The chapter concludes with a discussion of
the successes and weaknesses of the project to introduce water user
associations (WUAs) and water supply corporations into the Yangtze River
Basin as a way to reform and improve water management.
Chapter 5 is another instructive review of a country's water
institutions. The authors present a revealing description of the
environment in Mexico in which river basin management evolved starting
in the 1940s. They provide a thoughtful discussion of how political
priorities and budgets changed over time and how this altered
Mexico's river basin management and development activities. The
discussion focuses on five of the seven river basin commissions ranging
from the Fuente in the northwest to the Grijalva in the south. The
authors conclude that the river basin commissions have only accomplished
minor improvements in the distribution of economic activity and regional
development.
After three strong chapters providing new insights into contrasting
water institutions, Beaumont takes on the daunting task of appraising
the water institutions and organizations of five Middle Eastern
countries: Turkey, Iran, Jordan, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. Key findings
in the five countries include: (1) Iran's water institutions
incorporate elements from ancient customary law but the majority are
based on a broad interpretation of Islamic law that allows private
ownership and water trading along with recognizing water as a public
good, (2) Saudi Arabia has altered its water policy for irrigation from
one focused on food self-sufficiency before 1994, to one embracing a
more sustainable use of its groundwater, (3) Israel, very early on,
became committed to widespread irrigation development and settlement
that was not changed until the 1990s when it became clear that such a
policy was not sustainable, (4) in Jordan, too many parts of the
government have a role in water management partly because water has been
identified as a key constraint to development, and (5) Turkey used a
very centralized approach to water development and management until the
1990s when it began to turn over operations and management of irrigation
to the water users.
Chapter 7 is mostly about the political interaction among countries
clustered around international rivers used by South Africa. The authors
point out that growing security concerns during the Apartheid-era in
South Africa meant that water management on international rivers became
closely tied to security. Thus, international agreements involving water
use and development on these rivers were used as a tool to encourage
neighboring countries to cooperate with South Africa. Cooperation became
important for security reasons. The authors conclude that the resulting
water management institutions for transboundary river basins have had a
positive impact on South Africa's economic revitalization in the
post-Apartheid era.
The last two chapters provide a good overview of water rights in
the western U.S. Chuck Howe, in chapter 8, starts with a discussion of
the evolution of water rights in the western United States and how water
markets were allowed to develop. He goes on to discuss how the range of
"public values" for water have been expanding but that more is
needed to protect water quality, ecosystem values, and the local
economic base in water transfers.
Professor Huffaker concludes the book with a chapter that provides
an excellent assessment of the prior appropriations doctrine as applied
in the western United States. He finds that increased irrigation
efficiency has allowed irrigators to increase their consumptive use of
water to the detriment of both instream uses and downstream users. He
argues that the prior appropriation doctrine needs to be more flexible
and strictly enforced by (1) limiting transfers to the quantity of water
consumptively used, (2) eliminating outright restrictions on water
transfers outside of agriculture, (3) removing the use-it-or-lose-it
requirement and, (4) improving the procedures for approving water
transfers.
This book should be an important source book for those interested
in international water institutions and water management. As the book
clearly illustrates, major changes are badly needed in water
institutions and organizations if we are to meet our growing water
demands for food, people, and the environment. To help developing
countries meet this challenge, developed countries and international
organizations will need to invest more time and money on these
institutional issues.
K. William Easter
University of Minnesota
COPYRIGHT 2008 American Agricultural Economics
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.