Most won't admit it, but venture capitalists are getting more
cautious in the types of investments they make.
Many are saying that the lackluster economy has little to do with
this trend.
"In general, the venture community has become more
cautious," said Robert Kibble, managing partner of San Diego-based
Mission Ventures. "People are a lot less forgiving today" if a
company doesn't meet prescribed goals called milestones, he said.
Carl Eibl, managing director of Enterprise Partners Venture
Capital, the area's largest venture firm with about $700 million
under management, says one of the consequences of the sour economy is a
reluctance to invest in startups.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
"As a general matter, in a difficult economy, people are
reluctant to start new things," he said.
About two years ago, Enterprise had about 50 companies it was
investing in. Today, the number has shrunk to 33, primarily later stage
firms that are four to five years old, Eibl says.
Simple Strategy
Some of those culled were shut down, others were sold, but the
process hasn't changed that much. The strategy has always been to
support the ones that are on track and dump those that aren't, Eibl
says.
Some venture firms are deciding to seek out buyers for those
companies that aren't meeting expectations, rather than increasing
their investments, says Brian Sagi, chief executive officer of Cerian
Technology Ventures LLC, a local technology advisory firm.
"(VCs) are deciding it's better to sell the company
versus raising more funding, either because the funding is not available
or it is available at unfair terms."
Venture capital firms generally receive equity stakes in the
companies in return for investing millions of dollars to support the
development and operations of a startup. The investors get paid off in a
"liquidity event" that usually involves the company going
public or being sold to an acquirer.
In April, a Mission Ventures-backed firm, Vativ Technologies Inc.
of San Diego, was sold to Entropic Communications Inc., a local
telecommunications firm, for $5.9 million in cash.
The deal resulted in a loss to Mission investors, but Kibble
declined to reveal the amount of its investment. In three rounds, Vativ
obtained $37 million through the end of 2006, including investments from
Intel Capital, Redpoint Ventures and the Viterbi Group.
"Vativ didn't meet its business plan goals." Kibble
said.
More Pressure
Venture firms are also under increased pressure from investors to
ensure returns on their money, fund managers say.
"The biotech industry today is tinder considerable pressure to
deliver profits to our institutional investors and the current market
conditions are not helping those situations," said Stan Fleming,
managing member of Forward Ventures, which has about $450 million
invested in 22 life sciences companies.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The strategy for cashing out of venture investments has changed
considerably in recent years, say VC managers. In the past, almost
everyone focused on taking a company public, but today, reaching a point
where a business is acquired by a larger entity is the goal.
"The U.S. equity capital markets have been a lot less robust
for venture-backed companies for a long time now," said Jim
Ingraham, partner with Pricewaterhouse Coopers in San Diego. "The
IPO markets have dried up. If you want to make some dough, you have to
do an M&A (merger and acquisition) transaction."
Speed Matters
Meanwhile. investors into venture funds are seeking faster
turnarounds on their investments.
Neil Senturia, chief executive at Blackbird Ventures, a smaller
firm that makes investments averaging $500,000 to $1 million in startup
companies, says that in the past, the time frame to get a company to a
liquidation point was five to seven years, but today it's a lot
shorter.
"People don't want to hang around that long
anymore," he said.
Kevin Carroll, executive director for the AeA San Diego Council, a
technology trade group, says he hasn't seen any mass exodus of
venture firms pulling out of investing in local high-tech startups. But
more companies are having a tougher time securing VC funding, he says.
"The funding environment is probably more difficult for
companies seeking add-on rounds of financing," Carroll said.
"Will some companies go out of business? Sure, but a lot of others
will also focus more on growing their revenue, and just won't scale
up as quickly."
Tough Year for IPOs
The number of initial public offerings in the U.S. declined 74.5
percent this year, as of Aug. 6, compared with the same period in 2007.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
COPYRIGHT 2008 CBJ, L.P. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.