The economic necessity of being shrewdly competitive in
today's global markets drives many organizations to expand,
contract, grow, or reduce entire product lines or organizational
divisions very rapidly. As markets change and financial realities
redirect corporate strategies, businesses often consider combining
forces for increased market domination or to streamline and focus
products and services.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Mergers between organizations may occur, requiring some internal
downsizing of staff and activities. Acquisitions of one corporate entity
by another can occur to increase intellectual capital, available product
lines, or market presence, while simultaneously increasing executive
responsibilities for the management of financial, human, and physical
resources. Divestitures or closings might occur when certain products or
services are no longer viable in the marketplace.
These organizational changes may be years in planning or take place
rapidly--within a few weeks or months. Often, considerations regarding
data, information, and records are left to quickly formed working groups
or addressed as an afterthought when business activities begin to
decline in volume or criticality. Many organizations have later
regretted not creating thorough documentation on business process
changes or have not realized the expected financial reward of a merger
or acquisition because their records are inadequate to respond to
business, legal, or regulatory questions that arose.
This is an unfortunate reality unless executives require that
quality recordkeeping and records management processes be incorporated
into any activities resulting in global changes in corporate business
strategies and operations.
Business Change Demands Quality RIM
As organizations change strategies and overall activities,
individual business units within those organizations also
change--existing departments are eliminated, new departments are
created, and the responsibilities of the remaining elements of the
organizational structure are vastly changed.
Mergers create a combined company with the need to integrate
information management practices overall. However, specific information
management practices may vary between locations or business units, and a
cooperative consensus will need to be reached regarding how to best
manage information long-term. In acquisitions, the acquiring
organization may drive and determine the eventual outcome of information
management practices. However, a transition period and transition plans
will still be needed.
In cases when organizations split or closings occur, responsibility
for financial data preservation, intellectual property protection, and
information technology systems maintenance must be determined. During
divestitures, some records may be transferred to the buyer of the
business units that are sold, requiring decisions on mutual
responsibilities following the cessation of some business processes.
Complete closure of an organization or business will not necessarily
eradicate continuing responsibilities for records maintenance and
retention by all parties, if litigation or regulatory compliance issues
remain.
Failure to address these issues can lead to difficulties for
executives and attorneys if decisions must be justified or defended
later. There is no single solution to meeting such challenges, which
makes advance planning all the more critical.
Demanding a Place at the Table
Commonly, chief executive officers, company presidents, and
internal strategic planning staff initiate merger, acquisition,
divestiture, and closing (MADC)-related activities. Often, marketing
executives, attorneys, and financial personnel are added to due
diligence teams that may be formed as the deliberations become more
complex and the likelihood of organizational change becomes more
apparent.
Unfortunately, internal RIM program personnel are not always
included in these initiatives until later when, for example, it becomes
clear that a volume of important records needs to be placed in a
commonly accessible repository to ensure future access. Therefore, it is
critical for records managers to take the initiative in asserting both
the need to manage the life cycle of all information and the
corresponding need for them to participate in any teams chartered with
leading organizational change.
In a forward to The Art of M & A Due Diligence by Alexandra
Reed Lajoux and Charles M. Elson, PriceWaterhouseCoopers partner Philip
J. Clements noted that as much as 80 percent of merger/acquisition
transactions did not achieve their intended financial value for eventual
company shareholders. As Lajoux and Elson wrote in The Art of M&A
Due Diligence: "While there is no single reason for the high
failure rate, many transactions are unsuccessful because the acquirer
cut corners on due diligence--downsizing or delegating important due
diligence work."
Due diligence activities are very dependent on information,
documents, and records. Such processes must have professional-level
expertise if organizations are to be well-informed during
decision-making processes.
The added value from documenting the information assets of
organizations considered for merger or acquisition must be presented in
a clear business case that outlines both the benefits of professionally
managing records and the risks of not doing so. RIM activities are most
effective when they are started early in a merger/acquisition lifecycle
project. After team activities begin, it can be difficult to regain lost
time in assessing both team and business unit information assets and
making recommendations for their proper management.
Contributing to MADC Activities
Supporting merger and acquisitions teams is a major opportunity for
records managers.
Records managers are familiar with the need to educate records
creators regarding the principle that data, documents, and records in
all forms belong to the organizational body supporting creation of that
information. This principle must be presented clearly to any due
diligence or merger/acquisition teams that might form. This can be a
source of frustration for team members if the need to document team
activities is perceived as time-consuming and of low immediate value.
Typically, RIM professionals might also provide records checklists,
as well as manage records in an easily accessible repository for team
members. They may perform records inventories onsite at new locations,
establish retention periods for newly identified records series, and
design a document management system for managing both physical and
electronic records. It is common for due diligence teams to fail to
assess and inventory archival materials owned by other companies or in
other locations that still must be preserved. Records management
personnel excel at these kinds of activities.
The project team may also have a perception that it, the work
group, or business unit "owns" the records. But the need to
share information--both now and later (with personnel not currently on
any working group)--must be a primary part of the charter of any project
team, and this can be reinforced by the RIM professional.
The records professional also must clearly distinguish for team
members the difference between the records created for due diligence
team activities and the records created or owned by the organizations
that are involved in these processes. Only a small subset of the overall
information assets of a corporation will be needed for due diligence
processes by the team. Copies and/or originals of corporate records may
come into the possession of the team and need to be preserved as team
documentation, but they should be transitioned to the purview of a
records management department as the project closes.
Finally, the RIM manager needs to begin making plans for managing
the corporate records of the respective organizations after the merger
activity. (See "Strategies for Merging Recordkeeping Systems"
in this issue of The Information Management Journal.)
RIM Program Activity Challenges
Once it becomes clear that a merger/acquisition activity will
occur, all information resources and information management programs in
related organizations must be described and identified. Such an
inventory should include the existence of any information management
programs, the program scope, the degree of completion of retention
schedules, and any recordkeeping-related policies, procedures, or
business practices.
When few formal programs exist, the creation of new RIM programs
may become the responsibility of any current records management staff,
with a corresponding increase in their daily workloads. Such changes in
responsibilities and volume of activities may mean existing RIM programs
need additional support from management with respect to staff,
resources, and funding.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Association of Records Managers &
Administrators (ARMA) Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.